The 3q Oncogene SEC62 Predicts Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Regulates Tumor Cell Migration in Triple Negative Breast Cancer

In the absence of targeted treatment options, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is applied widely for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Response to NACT is an important parameter predictive of oncological outcomes (progression-free and overall survival). An approach to the evaluation of predictive markers enabling therapy individualization is the identification of tumor driver genetic mutations. This study was conducted to investigate the role of SEC62, harbored at 3q26 and identified as a driver of breast cancer pathogenesis, in TNBC. We analyzed SEC62 expression in The Cancer Genome Atlas database, and immunohistologically investigated SEC62 expression in pre- and post-NACT tissue samples from 64 patients with TNBC treated at the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics/Saarland University Hospital/Homburg between January 2010 and December 2018 and compared the effect of SEC62 on tumor cell migration and proliferation in functional assays. SEC62 expression dynamics correlated positively with the response to NACT (p ≤ 0.01) and oncological outcomes (p ≤ 0.01). SEC62 expression stimulated tumor cell migration (p ≤ 0.01). The study findings indicate that SEC62 is overexpressed in TNBC and serves as a predictive marker for the response to NACT, a prognostic marker for oncological outcomes, and a migration-stimulating oncogene in TNBC

BRCA1-deficient mammary tumor cells are dependent on EZH2 expression and sensitive to Polycomb Repressive Complex 2-inhibitor 3-deazaneplanocin A

10.1186/bcr2354Breast Cancer Research114R6

Genomic Signatures in Luminal Breast Cancer

Background:Breast cancer is a very heterogeneous disease and luminal breast carcinomas represent the hormone receptor-positive tumors among all breast cancer subtypes. In this context, multigene signatures were developed to gain further prognostic and predictive information beyond clinical parameters and traditional immunohistochemical markers.Summary:For early breast cancer patients these molecular tools can guide clinicians to decide on the extension of endocrine therapy to avoid over- and undertreatment by adjuvant chemotherapy. Beside the predictive and prognostic value, a few genomic tests are also able to provide intrinsic subtype classification. In this review, we compare the most frequently used and commercially available molecular tests (OncotypeDX (R), MammaPrint (R), Prosigna (R), EndoPredict (R), and Breast Cancer Index(SM)). Moreover, we discuss the clinical utility of molecular profiling for advanced breast cancer of the luminal subtype.Key Messages:Multigene assays can help to de-escalate systemic therapy in early-stage breast cancer. Only the Oncotype DX (R) and MammaPrint (R)degrees test are validated by entirely prospective and randomized phase 3 trials. More clinical evidence is needed to support the use of genomic tests in node-positive disease. Recent developments in high-throughput sequencing technology will provide further insights to understand the heterogeneity of luminal breast cancers in early-stage and metastatic disease

Detection of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ by Ultrasound and Mammography: Size-dependent Inaccuracy

Background: Retrospective analysis of breast cancer imaging methods is a common tool for evaluating the effectiveness of ultrasound and mammography regarding ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). No large number subpopulation of pure DCIS has been reported. It is however known that mammography and ultrasound underestimate tumor dimension with increasing tumor size. We aimed to quantify this discrepancy. Materials and Methods: This retrospective analysis reviewed the ultrasound and mammography data from 173 patients with DCIS at the University of Cologne - Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics between the years 2007 and 2010. Of these 173 patients, 34 fulfilled the DCIS analysis requirements and were evaluated in this study. Results: Overall, ultrasound underestimated tumor size 79.4% of the time, while overestimating only 20.6% of the time. Mammography underestimated tumor size in 50%, overestimated in 38.2%, correctly estimating in 11.8%. Over and underestimation distributions differed drastically above and a cut-off point of <= 2 cm actual tumor size, with a significant shift toward severe underestimation by both methods above a tumor size of 2 cm. DCIS misestimation was defined as the absolute value of the difference between actual tumor size and pre-surgical measurement by an imaging method. Mean DCIS size misestimation (actual tumor size <= 2 cm) was 3 mm for ultrasound and 6.2 mm for mammography. Conclusion: We support previous findings that ultrasound and mammography lose accuracy with increasing tumor size. Nonetheless, ultrasound may be more useful in estimation of DCIS size for tumors <= 2 cm than previously expected

Improving Breast Conserving Surgery Using the Faxitron (R) OR Specimen Radiography System - A Complication Analysis, Cost Evaluation and Literature Review

Background/Aim: The combination of pre-surgical clip placement and hook-wire guided surgery is considered the gold standard for adequately locating non-palpable lesions during breast conserving surgery. After surgical removal of the segment, radiography is required to confirm clip removal, increasing surgical time, post-surgical complication rates, and cost. Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis, using the Faxitron (R) in-theater specimen radiography system, of the following primary endpoints: surgical time and complication rates. The secondary endpoints were cost effectiveness and clip-location rates. The Control cohort included breast conserving surgery patients prior to May 2019 (n=150) and the Validation cohort included breast conserving surgery patients after May 2019 (n=53). Results: The analysis showed an improvement in surgical time when using the Faxitron (R) system, which is directly linked to a benefit in cost effectiveness. A numerical benefit in complication rates was also shown. A subgroup analysis showed a significant advantage in surgical time for breast conserving surgery plus sentinel node biopsy and open breast biopsies. Conclusion: Use of the Faxitron (R) system significantly reduces surgical time, which increases cost efficiency while maintaining a low complication rate

Gene-expression Profiling - A Decision Impact Analysis: Decision Dependency on Oncotype DX (R) as a Function of Oncological Work Experience in 117 Cases

Background: Estimating distant recurrence risk in women with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative early breast cancer is still challenging. Oncotype DX (R) is a gene expression-based test predicting the likelihood of recurrent disease. This study analyzed the difference in oncological decision making with and without the knowledge of gene-expression tests based on oncological work experience. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective analysis including n=113 patients diagnosed with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer between 2011 and 2015 at the Municipal Breast Cancer Center Cologne, Germany. All 113 patients underwent evaluation by OncotypeDX (R). An oncological Tumor Board with knowledge of these results served as baseline (control group). This baseline was compared to the treatment decision for adjuvant chemotherapy reached by oncologists with different experience levels (less than 5 years, between 5 and 15 years and more than 15 years) who were not provided the OncotypeDX (R) results. Results: Inexperience led to a significant increase in recommendations for chemotherapy, with those made by the Tumor Board being least frequent (41.6% vs. 15 years=42.5%; p14%, pN1 and postmenopausal status than were oncologists with up to 15 years experience, with a strong trend for those with tumor size larger than pT2. Conclusion: With a maximum reduction of 14.2% for those with the lowest level of oncological experience, the likelihood of recommending chemotherapy was found to decrease with increasing oncological work experience. A subgroup analysis showed that differences in decision making were most likely in patients with a Ki67 >14%, tumor sizes larger than pT2, pN1 and postmenopausal patients. It is the opinion of this study group that gene-expression testing is especially pertinent for these subgroups