14 research outputs found

    Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis – Patients' Experiences, Information Interests and Responses to an Education Programme

    No full text
    <div><p><i>Background</i></p><p>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a key diagnostic and monitoring tool in multiple sclerosis (MS) management. However, many scientific uncertainties, especially concerning correlates to impairment and prognosis remain. Little is known about MS patients' experiences, knowledge, attitudes, and unmet information needs concerning MRI.</p><p><i>Methods</i></p><p>We performed qualitative interviews (n = 5) and a survey (n = 104) with MS patients regarding MRI patient information, and basic MRI knowledge. Based on these findings an interactive training program of 2 hours was developed and piloted in n = 26 patients.</p><p><i>Results</i></p><p>Interview analyses showed that patients often feel lost in the MRI scanner and left alone with MRI results and images while 90% of patients in the survey expressed a high interest in MRI education. Knowledge on MRI issues was fair with some important knowledge gaps. Major information interests were relevance of lesions as well as the prognostic and diagnostic value of MRI results. The education program was highly appreciated and resulted in a substantial knowledge increase. Patients reported that, based on the program, they felt more competent to engage in encounters with their physicians.</p><p><i>Conclusion</i></p><p>This work strongly supports the further development of an evidence-based MRI education program for MS patients to enhance participation in health-care.</p></div

    Demographic data of survey on MRI experiences.

    No full text
    <p>Values are numbers (%) if not indicated differently.</p><p>* 12 or more years of school,</p><p>** Range 0–10 with higher values indicating good knowledge.</p><p>*** Objective MRI knowledge (range 0–17 with higher values indicating good knowledge).</p><p>Demographic data of survey on MRI experiences.</p

    Sensitivity analyses using pooled data for associations between genetically predicted BMI and breast cancer risk in the BCAC.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Adjusted for age, study sites, and the first eight principal components. (b) Adjusted for age, study sites, the first eight principal components, and additional breast cancer risk factors: age at menarche, parity, use of contraceptive, use of hormone replacement therapy, breast feeding, and smoking status. Weighted: the BMI-GS was constructed using the additive model weighted by external beta reported from previous literatures. Unweighted: the BMI-GS was constructed using the additive model without any weight.</p

    Associations of the weighted BMI-GSs with BMI and traditional breast cancer risk factors.

    No full text
    <p>Associations of the weighted BMI-GSs with BMI and traditional breast cancer risk factors.</p
    corecore