10 research outputs found

    Representative immunohistochemical staining of GFAP in SNpc.

    No full text
    <p><b>A</b> and <b>B</b>, immuno-staining against GFAP antibody. <b>A'</b> and <b>B'</b>, immuno-fluorescent staining against TH antibody. <b>A''</b> and <b>B''</b>, merging of immuno-stainings against GFAP and TH antibodies, the later was represented with a pseudo-color. SNpc was highlighted in each panel. Inset, a higher magnification of SNpc for each picture. Scale bar, 200 ”m.</p

    Validation of microarray results in SNpc by real time quantitative PCR.

    No full text
    <p>Relative log2 fold changes of mRNA were presented comparing late middle-aged (18months old) to young (2month old) mice. Positive numbers corresponded to up-regulated genes, whereas negative numbers indicated down-regulated genes. *, <i>p</i><0.05 comparing 18 to 2 months old mice using Student’s <i>t</i>-test. <i>n</i> = 4 replicates for each age group.</p

    Volcano plots illustrating differential gene expression in SNpc (A) & VTA (B) comparing late middle-aged (18months old) to young (2month old) mice.

    No full text
    <p>Differentially expressed genes were distributed in the top left and top right sections of each figure, corresponding <i>pFDR</i> <0.05 and fold change<−1.3 and <i>pFDR</i> <0.05 and fold change >1.3, respectively.</p

    Age-associated genes specific to mouse SNpc.

    No full text
    *<p>Comparing 18 months old to 2 months old mice, positive numbers corresponded to up-regulated genes, whereas negative numbers indicated down-regulated genes.</p

    SNpc and VTA dissection from mouse brain.

    No full text
    <p>Brain sections were labeled against tyrosine hydroxylase antibody without (<b>A</b>) and after (<b>B</b>) SNpc dissection, and without (<b>C</b>) and after (<b>D</b>) VTA dissection. Scale bar: 500 ”m. <b>E</b>. Relative <i>Calb1</i> mRNA level. *, <i>p</i><0.05 comparing VTA to SNpc (<i>n</i> = 4 in each group).</p

    Expression profile of miR-200f and EMT-transcriptional inducers in breast tumors.

    No full text
    <p>The expression levels of miR-200 family members (<b>A</b>) and EMT-transcriptional inducers (<b>B</b>) were quantified by qRT-PCR in 70 breast cancer samples. Data are depicted as box-and-whisker plots. Adjusted <i>p</i>-values are shown where significant differences were found (Wilcoxon rank-sum test). ER+ (estrogen receptor positive tumors), HER2+ (HER2-positive tumors), TN (triple negative; ER−, PR−, HER2−), MBC (metaplastic breast carcinomas). (<b>C</b>) Upper heatmap represents Pearson coefficient (R) correlation values between the expression of EMT-transcriptional inducers and miR200f members. Bottom heatmap depicts the level of statistical significance (P) of the correlations.</p

    miR-200f and EMT-transcriptional inducers are modulated during <i>in vitro</i> EMT in breast basal cell lines.

    No full text
    <p>Expression of (<b>A</b>) miR-200f and (<b>B</b>) EMT-transcriptional inducers was evaluated by qRT-PCR in the sorted epithelial (EpCAM+) and mesenchymal (Fibros) subpopulations within MCF12A and Myo1089 cell lines. Data are normalized to the expression of <i>RNU48</i> and <i>18S</i> respectively. Bars represent mean expression changes ±SE in Fibros subpopulation relative to EpCAM+ cells (baseline). Three biological replicates were measured. Moderated t-test was performed to evaluate statistical significance (<i>p</i><0.001 for all miRNAs analyzed in panel A. <i>NS</i>, non significant). (<b>C</b>) Methylation status of <i>miR-200f</i> promoter sequences in EpCAM+ and Fibros subpopulations within MCF12A and Myo1089 cell lines. Histogram bars represent averaged methylation levels (±SE) for the promoter sequences of <i>miR-200f loci</i>. Statistically significant differences are indicated (*<i>p</i><0.001, Student’s t-test).</p
    corecore