266 research outputs found
Cooperation and Community Responsibility: A Folk Theorem for Repeated Matching Games with Names
On the Use of Cauchy Prior Distributions for Bayesian Logistic Regression
In logistic regression, separation occurs when a linear combination of the
predictors can perfectly classify part or all of the observations in the
sample, and as a result, finite maximum likelihood estimates of the regression
coefficients do not exist. Gelman et al. (2008) recommended independent Cauchy
distributions as default priors for the regression coefficients in logistic
regression, even in the case of separation, and reported posterior modes in
their analyses. As the mean does not exist for the Cauchy prior, a natural
question is whether the posterior means of the regression coefficients exist
under separation. We prove theorems that provide necessary and sufficient
conditions for the existence of posterior means under independent Cauchy priors
for the logit link and a general family of link functions, including the probit
link. We also study the existence of posterior means under multivariate Cauchy
priors. For full Bayesian inference, we develop a Gibbs sampler based on
Polya-Gamma data augmentation to sample from the posterior distribution under
independent Student-t priors including Cauchy priors, and provide a companion R
package in the supplement. We demonstrate empirically that even when the
posterior means of the regression coefficients exist under separation, the
magnitude of the posterior samples for Cauchy priors may be unusually large,
and the corresponding Gibbs sampler shows extremely slow mixing. While
alternative algorithms such as the No-U-Turn Sampler in Stan can greatly
improve mixing, in order to resolve the issue of extremely heavy tailed
posteriors for Cauchy priors under separation, one would need to consider
lighter tailed priors such as normal priors or Student-t priors with degrees of
freedom larger than one
Mobility and Conflict
We study the role of inter-group differences in the emergence of conflict. In our setting, two groups compete for the right to allocate societys resources, and we allow for costly intergroup mobility. The winning group offers an allocation, that the opposition can either accept, or reject and wage conflict. Expropriating a large share of resources increases political strength by attracting opposition members, but such economic exclusion implies lower per capita shares and higher risk of conflict. In equilibrium, allocations are non-monotonic in the cost of mobility. Moreover, limited commitment with respect to mobility gives rise to inefficient conflict in equilibrium.conflict, inter-group mobility, political competition, resource allocation
Reputation Building Under Uncertain Monitoring
We study a canonical model of reputation between a long-run player and a sequence of short-run opponents, in which the long-run player is privately informed about an uncertain state that determines the monitoring structure in the reputation game. The long-run player plays a stage-game repeatedly against a sequence of short-run opponents. We present necessary and suļ¬icient conditions (on the monitoring structure and the type space) to obtain reputation building in this setting. Speciļ¬cally, in contrast to the previous literature, with only stationary commitment types, reputation building is generally not possible and highly sensitive to the inclusion of other commitment types. However, with the inclusion of appropriate dynamic commitment types, reputation building can again be sustained while maintaining robustness to the inclusion of other arbitrary types
Reputation with Opportunities for Coasting
Reputation concerns can discipline agents to take costly eļ¬ort and generate good outcomes. But what if outcomes are not always observed? We consider a model of reputation with shifting observability, and ask how this aļ¬ects agentsā incentives. We identify a novel and intuitive mechanism by which infrequent observation or inattention can actually strengthen reputation incentives and encourage eļ¬ort. If an agent anticipates that outcomes may not be observed in the future, the beneļ¬ts from eļ¬ort today are enhanced due to a ācoastingā eļ¬ect. By investing eļ¬ort when outcomes are more likely observed, the agent can improve her reputation, and when the audience is inattentive in the future, she can coast on this reputation without additional eļ¬ort. We show that future opportunities to rest on oneās laurels can lead to greater overall eļ¬ort and higher eļ¬iciency than constant observation. This has implications for the design of review systems or performance feedback systems in organizations. We provide a characterization of the optimal observability structure to maximize eļ¬icient eļ¬ort in our setting
Prepare-and-measure based QKD protocol under free-space losses
In this study, we have theoretically presented a prepare-and-measure-based
SARG04 protocol over free space. It has shown that the highest secret key rate
is possible even under free-space losses with a maximum tolerance of noise.Comment: 4 pages, 1 figur
Reputation for a Servant of Two Masters
Classic models of reputation consider an agent taking costly actions to
affect a single, homogeneous audience’s beliefs about his ability,
preferences or other characteristic. However, in many economic settings,
agents must maintain a reputation with multiple parties with diverse
interests. In this paper we study reputation incentives for an agent who
faces two audiences with opposed preferences. We ask if the existence of
multiple audiences per se changes reputation incentives. Further, should
the agent deal with the different audiences commonly or separately? Our
analysis yields some new qualitative insights. Specifically, the
presences of heterogeneous audiences is more likely to lead the agent
towards “pooling” equilibria in which he takes an
intermediate compromise action. Instead, dealing with only one audience
leads the agent to cater towards that audience’s preferences,
giving rise to a “separating” outcome or pooling on some
extreme action. We analyze the welfare implications, and show that the
agent most prefers that both audiences commonly observe all the actions
that he takes. In our setting, reputation acts as an informal contract
that enforces desirable behavior through future continuation payoffs.
Our analysis highlights that the presence of multiple heterogeneous
audiences can, naturally, lead these rewards to be non-monotonic in an
agent’s reputation. We show different ways that this
non-monotonicity arises. In an infinite horizon setting, it can emerge
through endogenous interactions between the audiences, through
equilibrium expectations of the agent’s choice of action. It can
also arise, perhaps more trivially, through direct payoff interactions
- ā¦