34 research outputs found
Assessment of Disparities Associated with a Crisis Standards of Care Resource Allocation Algorithm for Patients in 2 US Hospitals during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Importance: Significant concern has been raised that crisis standards of care policies aimed at guiding resource allocation may be biased against people based on race/ethnicity. Objective: To evaluate whether unanticipated disparities by race or ethnicity arise from a single institution\u27s resource allocation policy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included adults (aged ≥18 years) who were cared for on a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) ward or in a monitored unit requiring invasive or noninvasive ventilation or high-flow nasal cannula between May 26 and July 14, 2020, at 2 academic hospitals in Miami, Florida. Exposures: Race (ie, White, Black, Asian, multiracial) and ethnicity (ie, non-Hispanic, Hispanic). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was based on a resource allocation priority score (range, 1-8, with 1 indicating highest and 8 indicating lowest priority) that was assigned daily based on both estimated short-term (using Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score) and longer-term (using comorbidities) mortality. There were 2 coprimary outcomes: maximum and minimum score for each patient over all eligible patient-days. Standard summary statistics were used to describe the cohort, and multivariable Poisson regression was used to identify associations of race and ethnicity with each outcome. Results: The cohort consisted of 5613 patient-days of data from 1127 patients (median [interquartile range {IQR}] age, 62.7 [51.7-73.7]; 607 [53.9%] men). Of these, 711 (63.1%) were White patients, 323 (28.7%) were Black patients, 8 (0.7%) were Asian patients, and 31 (2.8%) were multiracial patients; 480 (42.6%) were non-Hispanic patients, and 611 (54.2%) were Hispanic patients. The median (IQR) maximum priority score for the cohort was 3 (1-4); the median (IQR) minimum score was 2 (1-3). After adjustment, there was no association of race with maximum priority score using White patients as the reference group (Black patients: incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.00; 95% CI, 0.89-1.12; Asian patients: IRR, 0.95; 95% CI. 0.62-1.45; multiracial patients: IRR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.72-1.19) or of ethnicity using non-Hispanic patients as the reference group (Hispanic patients: IRR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.88-1.10); similarly, no association was found with minimum score for race, again with White patients as the reference group (Black patients: IRR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.90-1.14; Asian patients: IRR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.62-1.49; multiracial patients: IRR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.61-1.07) or ethnicity, again with non-Hispanic patients as the reference group (Hispanic patients: IRR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.89-1.13). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of adult patients admitted to a COVID-19 unit at 2 US hospitals, there was no association of race or ethnicity with the priority score underpinning the resource allocation policy. Despite this finding, any policy to guide altered standards of care during a crisis should be monitored to ensure equitable distribution of resources
Marriage, Migration, and Urban Demographic Structure: a Case From France in the Belle Epoque
Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/67248/2/10.1177_036319908100600109.pd
Recommended from our members
Effects of exogenous lipids on blood gas measurements
OBJECTIVENumerous reports have appeared describing the effects of intravenous lipid administration on the pulmonary function of the critically ill patient. Our study was undertaken to determine whether the lipid content of an arterial blood gas specimen affects the measurement of arterial pH, Pao2, Paco2, or arterial oxygen saturation.
DESIGNProspective, in vitro controlled study.
SETTINGMedical and cardiac intensive care units.
PATIENTSCritically ill patients undergoing clinically-directed blood gas sampling via indwelling arterial catheters.
INTERVENTIONSNone.
MEASUREMENTSArterial blood gas specimens were modified in vitro by dividing the sample and adding a known amount of lipid emulsion to half of the sample, resulting in a difference between the plasma triglyceride concentrations of the two halves. Two series of experiments were runone series was run with a predicted plasma triglyceride difference of 400 mg/dL (4.5 mmol/L) between the two samples; the other series was run with a predicted plasma triglyceride difference of 800 mg/dL (9.0 mmol/L) between the two samples. Blood gas measurements were performed on each half of a sample, and the results were compared. Because some studies have only noted changes in patients with the adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), samples from these patients were also analyzed as a separate group.
RESULTSNo significant changes were found in arterial pH, Pao2, Paco2, or arterial oxygen saturation between the two halves of the sample. With 95% confidence, differences as small as 1.5 torr (0.2 kPa) for Pao2 and Paco2,0.5% for arterial oxygen saturation, and 0.005 for pH, would have been detected. No differences were found in the ARDS subgroup.
CONCLUSIONSThe addition of clinically relevant amounts of lipid to blood samples does not affect blood gas measurements. Any observed changes in blood gas values after lipid feeding are presumably due to products of lipid metabolism or alterations in pulmonary function