Robotic manipulation for the shoe-packaging process

[EN] This paper presents the integration of a robotic system in a human-centered environment, as it can be found in the shoe manufacturing industry. Fashion footwear is nowadays mainly handcrafted due to the big amount of small production tasks. Therefore, the introduction of intelligent robotic systems in this industry may contribute to automate and improve the manual production steps, such us polishing, cleaning, packaging, and visual inspection. Due to the high complexity of the manual tasks in shoe production, cooperative robotic systems (which can work in collaboration with humans) are required. Thus, the focus of the robot lays on grasping, collision detection, and avoidance, as well as on considering the human intervention to supervise the work being performed. For this research, the robot has been equipped with a Kinect camera and a wrist force/ torque sensor so that it is able to detect human interaction and the dynamic environment in order to modify the robot¿s behavior. To illustrate the applicability of the proposed approach, this work presents the experimental results obtained for two actual platforms, which are located at different research laboratories, that share similarities in their morphology, sensor equipment and actuation system.This work has been partly supported by the Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad of the Spanish Government (Key No.: 0201603139 of Invest in Spain program and Grant No. RTC-2016-5408-6) and by the Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (DAAD) of the German Government (Projekt-ID 54368155).Gracia Calandin, LI.; Perez-Vidal, C.; Mronga, D.; Paco, JD.; Azorin, J.; Gea, JD. (2017). Robotic manipulation for the shoe-packaging process. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 92(1-4):1053-1067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0212-6S10531067921-4Pedrocchi N, Villagrossi E, Cenati C, Tosatti LM (2017) Design of fuzzy logic controller of industrial robot for roughing the uppers of fashion shoes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 77(5):939–953Hinojo-Perez JJ, Davia-Aracil M, Jimeno-Morenilla A, Sanchez-Romero L, Salas F (2016) Automation of the shoe last grading process according to international sizing systems. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85(1):455–467Dura-Gil JV, Ballester-Fernandez A, Cavallaro M, Chiodi A, Ballarino A, von Arnim V., Brondi C, Stellmach D (2016) New technologies for customizing products for people with special necessities: project fashion-able. Int J Comput Integr Manuf. In Press, doi: 10.1080/0951192X.2016.1145803Jatta F, Zanoni L, Fassi I, Negri S (2004) A roughing/cementing robotic cell for custom made shoe manufacture. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 17(7):645–652Nemec B, Zlajpah L (2008) Robotic cell for custom finishing operations. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 21(1):33–42Molfino R, et al (2004) Modular, reconfigurable prehensor for grasping and handling limp materials in the shoe industry. In: IMS international forum, CernobbioIntelishoe - integration and linking of shoe and auxiliary industries. 5Th FPSpecial shoes movement. 7th FP, NMP-2008-SME-2-R.229261, http://www.sshoes.euVilaca JL, Fonseca J (2007) A new software application for footwear industry. In: IEEE international symposium on intelligent signal processing WISP 2007, pp 1–6Custom, environment and comfort made shoe. 6TH FP [2004-2008]Framework of integrated technologies for user centred products. Grant agreement no.: CP-TP 229336-2. NMP2-SE-2009-229336 FIT4U -7TH FPRobofoot project website. http://www.robofoot.eu/ . Accessed 2016/ 09/16Montiel E (2007) Customization in the footwear industry. In: proceedings of the MIT congress on mass customizationSucan I, Kavraki LE (2012) A sampling-based tree planner for systems with complex dynamics, vol 28Kuffner JJ Jr, LaValle SM (2000) Rrt-connect: an efficient approach to single-query path planning. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, 2000. ICRA ’00, vol 2, pp 995–1001Ratliff N, Zucker M, Andrew Bagnell J, Srinivasa S (2009) Chomp: gradient optimization techniques for efficient motion planning. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, 2009. ICRA ’09, pp 489–494Brock O, Khatib O (1997) Elastic strips: real-time path modification for mobile manipulationKroger T (2011) Opening the door to new sensor-based robot applications #x2014;the reflexxes motion libraries. In: 2011 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), pp 1–4Berg J, Ferguson D, Kuffner J (2006) Anytime path planning and replanning in dynamic environments. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), pp 2366–2371Berenson D, Abbeel P, Goldberg K (2012) A robot path planning framework that learns from experience. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation. IEEE, pp 3671–3678Bischoff R, Kurth J, Schreiber G, Koeppe R, Albu-Schaeffer A, Beyer A, Eiberger O, Haddadin S, Stemmer A, Grunwald G, Hirzinger G (2010) The kuka-dlr lightweight robot arm — a new reference platform for robotics research and manufacturing. In: Robotics (ISR), 2010 41st international symposium on and 2010 6th German conference on robotics (ROBOTIK), pp 1–8Rooks B (2006) The harmonious robot. Industrial Robot-an International Journal 33:125–130Vahrenkamp N, Wieland S, Azad P, Gonzalez D, Asfour T, Dillmann R (2008) Visual servoing for humanoid grasping and manipulation tasks. In: 8th IEEE-RAS international conference on humanoid robots, 2008, Humanoids 2008, pp 406–412Pieters RS, et al. (2012) Direct trajectory generation for vision-based obstacle avoidance. In: Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systemsKinect for windows sensor components and specifications, website. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj131033.aspx . Accessed 2016/09/16Jatta F, Zanoni L, Fassi I, Negri S (2004) A roughing cementing robotic cell for custom made shoe manufacture. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 17(7):645–652Maurtua I, Ibarguren A, Tellaeche A (2012) Robotics for the benefit of footwear industry. In: International conference on intelligent robotics and applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 235–244Arkin RC (1998) Behavior-based robotics. MIT PressNilsson NJ (1980) Principles of artificial intelligence. Morgan KaufmannAsada H, Slotine J-JE (1986) Robot analysis and control. WileyROS official web page. http://www.ros.org , (Accessed on 2017/ 02/03)Langmann B, Hartmann K, Loffeld O (2012) Depth camera technology comparison and performance evaluation. In: 1st international conference on pattern recognition applications and methods, pp 438–444The player project. free software tools for robot and sensor applications. http://playerstage.sourceforge.net/ , (Accessed on 2017/ 02/03)Yet another robot platform (YARP). http://www.yarp.it/ , (Accessed on 2017/02/03)The OROCOS project. smarter control in robotics and automation. http://www.orocos.org/ , (Accessed on 2017/02/03)CARMEN: Robot navigation toolkit. http://carmen.sourceforge.net/ , (Accessed on 2017/02/03)ORCA: Components for robotics. http://orca-robotics.sourceforge.net/ , (Accessed on 2017/02/03)MOOS: Mission oriented operating suite. http://www.robots.ox.ac.uk/mobile/MOOS/wiki/pmwiki.php/Main/HomePage , (Accessed on 2017/02/03)Microsoft robotics studio. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=29081 , (Accessed on 2017/02/03)Pr2 ros website. http://www.ros.org/wiki/Robots/PR2 . Accessed 2016/09/16Care-o-bot 3 ros website. http://www.ros.org/wiki/Robots/Care-O-bot . Accessed 2016/09/16Aila, mobile dual-arm manipulation, website. http://robotik.dfki-bremen.de/de/forschung/robotersysteme/aila.html . Accessed 2016/09/16Package libpcan documentation, website. http://www.ros.org/wiki/libpcan . Accessed 2016/09/16Pcan driver for linux, user manual. http://www.peak-system.com . Document version 7.1 (2011-03-21)Pcan driver for linux, user manual. http://wiki.ros.org/schunk_powercube_chain . Accessed 2016/09/16Ros nodes documentation, website. http://www.ros.org/wiki/Nodes . Accessed 2016/09/16Ros messages documentation, website. http://www.ros.org/wiki/Messages . Accessed 2016/09/16Ros topics documentation, website. http://www.ros.org/wiki/Topics . Accessed 2016/09/16Ros services documentation, website. http://www.ros.org/wiki/Services . Accessed 2016/09/16Yaml files officials website. http://www.yaml.org/ . Accessed 2016/ 09/16Ros robot model (urdf) documentation website. http://www.ros.org/wiki/urdf . Accessed 2016/09/16Point cloud library (pcl), website. http://www.pointclouds.org/ . Accessed 2016/09/16Arm navigation ros stack, website. http://wiki.ros.org/arm_navigation . Accessed 2016/09/16Hornung A, Wurm KM, Bennewitz M, Stachniss C, Burgard W (2013) Octomap: an efficient probabilistic 3d mapping framework based on octrees Autonomous RobotsOrocos kdl documentation, website. http://www.orocos.org/kdl . Accessed 2016/09/16Ioan A, Şucan MM, Kavraki LE (2012) The open motion planning library, vol 19. http://ompl.kavrakilab.orgWaibel M, Beetz M, Civera J, D’Andrea R, Elfring J, Galvez-Lopez D, Haussermann K, Janssen R, Montiel JMM, Perzylo A, Schiessle B, Tenorth M, Zweigle O, van de Molengraft R (2011) Roboearth. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 18(2):69–82Simox toolbox. http://simox.sourceforge.net/ . Accessed 2016/09/16Moreels P, Perona P (2007) Evaluation of features detectors and descriptors based on 3d objects. Int J Comput Vis 73:263–284Viola P, Jones M (2001) Rapid object detection using a boosted cascade of simple features. In: Proceedings of the IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2001. CVPR 2001, vol 1Teuliere C, Marchand E, Eck L (2010) Using multiple hypothesis in model-based tracking. In: 2010 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), pp 4559–4565Moulianitis VC, Dentsoras AJ, Aspragathos NA (1999) A knowledge-based system for the conceptual design of grippers for handling fabrics. Artif Intell Eng Des Anal Manuf 13(1):13–25Davis S, Tsagarakis NG, Caldwell DG (2008) The initial design and manufacturing process of a low cost hand for the robot icub. In: 8th IEEE-RAS international conference on humanoid robots, pp 40–45Cerruti G, Chablat D, Gouaillier D, Sakka S (2017) Design method for an anthropomorphic hand able to gesture and grasp. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation. IEEE, pp 3671–367

Impact of COVID-19 on cardiovascular testing in the United States versus the rest of the world

Objectives: This study sought to quantify and compare the decline in volumes of cardiovascular procedures between the United States and non-US institutions during the early phase of the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the care of many non-COVID-19 illnesses. Reductions in diagnostic cardiovascular testing around the world have led to concerns over the implications of reduced testing for cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality. Methods: Data were submitted to the INCAPS-COVID (International Atomic Energy Agency Non-Invasive Cardiology Protocols Study of COVID-19), a multinational registry comprising 909 institutions in 108 countries (including 155 facilities in 40 U.S. states), assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on volumes of diagnostic cardiovascular procedures. Data were obtained for April 2020 and compared with volumes of baseline procedures from March 2019. We compared laboratory characteristics, practices, and procedure volumes between U.S. and non-U.S. facilities and between U.S. geographic regions and identified factors associated with volume reduction in the United States. Results: Reductions in the volumes of procedures in the United States were similar to those in non-U.S. facilities (68% vs. 63%, respectively; p = 0.237), although U.S. facilities reported greater reductions in invasive coronary angiography (69% vs. 53%, respectively; p < 0.001). Significantly more U.S. facilities reported increased use of telehealth and patient screening measures than non-U.S. facilities, such as temperature checks, symptom screenings, and COVID-19 testing. Reductions in volumes of procedures differed between U.S. regions, with larger declines observed in the Northeast (76%) and Midwest (74%) than in the South (62%) and West (44%). Prevalence of COVID-19, staff redeployments, outpatient centers, and urban centers were associated with greater reductions in volume in U.S. facilities in a multivariable analysis. Conclusions: We observed marked reductions in U.S. cardiovascular testing in the early phase of the pandemic and significant variability between U.S. regions. The association between reductions of volumes and COVID-19 prevalence in the United States highlighted the need for proactive efforts to maintain access to cardiovascular testing in areas most affected by outbreaks of COVID-19 infection

Reduction of cardiac imaging tests during the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of Italy. Findings from the IAEA Non-invasive Cardiology Protocol Survey on COVID-19 (INCAPS COVID)

Background: In early 2020, COVID-19 massively hit Italy, earlier and harder than any other European country. This caused a series of strict containment measures, aimed at blocking the spread of the pandemic. Healthcare delivery was also affected when resources were diverted towards care of COVID-19 patients, including intensive care wards. Aim of the study: The aim is assessing the impact of COVID-19 on cardiac imaging in Italy, compare to the Rest of Europe (RoE) and the World (RoW). Methods: A global survey was conducted in May–June 2020 worldwide, through a questionnaire distributed online. The survey covered three periods: March and April 2020, and March 2019. Data from 52 Italian centres, a subset of the 909 participating centres from 108 countries, were analyzed. Results: In Italy, volumes decreased by 67% in March 2020, compared to March 2019, as opposed to a significantly lower decrease (p &lt; 0.001) in RoE and RoW (41% and 40%, respectively). A further decrease from March 2020 to April 2020 summed up to 76% for the North, 77% for the Centre and 86% for the South. When compared to the RoE and RoW, this further decrease from March 2020 to April 2020 in Italy was significantly less (p = 0.005), most likely reflecting the earlier effects of the containment measures in Italy, taken earlier than anywhere else in the West. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic massively hit Italy and caused a disruption of healthcare services, including cardiac imaging studies. This raises concern about the medium- and long-term consequences for the high number of patients who were denied timely diagnoses and the subsequent lifesaving therapies and procedures

International Impact of COVID-19 on the Diagnosis of Heart Disease

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has adversely affected diagnosis and treatment of noncommunicable diseases. Its effects on delivery of diagnostic care for cardiovascular disease, which remains the leading cause of death worldwide, have not been quantified. Objectives: The study sought to assess COVID-19's impact on global cardiovascular diagnostic procedural volumes and safety practices. Methods: The International Atomic Energy Agency conducted a worldwide survey assessing alterations in cardiovascular procedure volumes and safety practices resulting from COVID-19. Noninvasive and invasive cardiac testing volumes were obtained from participating sites for March and April 2020 and compared with those from March 2019. Availability of personal protective equipment and pandemic-related testing practice changes were ascertained. Results: Surveys were submitted from 909 inpatient and outpatient centers performing cardiac diagnostic procedures, in 108 countries. Procedure volumes decreased 42% from March 2019 to March 2020, and 64% from March 2019 to April 2020. Transthoracic echocardiography decreased by 59%, transesophageal echocardiography 76%, and stress tests 78%, which varied between stress modalities. Coronary angiography (invasive or computed tomography) decreased 55% (p &lt; 0.001 for each procedure). In multivariable regression, significantly greater reduction in procedures occurred for centers in countries with lower gross domestic product. Location in a low-income and lower–middle-income country was associated with an additional 22% reduction in cardiac procedures and less availability of personal protective equipment and telehealth. Conclusions: COVID-19 was associated with a significant and abrupt reduction in cardiovascular diagnostic testing across the globe, especially affecting the world's economically challenged. Further study of cardiovascular outcomes and COVID-19–related changes in care delivery is warranted

Impact of COVID-19 on Diagnostic Cardiac Procedural Volume in Oceania: The IAEA Non-Invasive Cardiology Protocol Survey on COVID-19 (INCAPS COVID)

Objectives: The INCAPS COVID Oceania study aimed to assess the impact caused by the COVID-19 pandemic on cardiac procedure volume provided in the Oceania region. Methods: A retrospective survey was performed comparing procedure volumes within March 2019 (pre-COVID-19) with April 2020 (during first wave of COVID-19 pandemic). Sixty-three (63) health care facilities within Oceania that perform cardiac diagnostic procedures were surveyed, including a mixture of metropolitan and regional, hospital and outpatient, public and private sites, and 846 facilities outside of Oceania. The percentage change in procedure volume was measured between March 2019 and April 2020, compared by test type and by facility. Results: In Oceania, the total cardiac diagnostic procedure volume was reduced by 52.2% from March 2019 to April 2020, compared to a reduction of 75.9% seen in the rest of the world (p&lt;0.001). Within Oceania sites, this reduction varied significantly between procedure types, but not between types of health care facility. All procedure types (other than stress cardiac magnetic resonance [CMR] and positron emission tomography [PET]) saw significant reductions in volume over this time period (p&lt;0.001). In Oceania, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) decreased by 51.6%, transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) by 74.0%, and stress tests by 65% overall, which was more pronounced for stress electrocardiograph (ECG) (81.8%) and stress echocardiography (76.7%) compared to stress single-photon emission computerised tomography (SPECT) (44.3%). Invasive coronary angiography decreased by 36.7% in Oceania. Conclusion: A significant reduction in cardiac diagnostic procedure volume was seen across all facility types in Oceania and was likely a function of recommendations from cardiac societies and directives from government to minimise spread of COVID-19 amongst patients and staff. Longer term evaluation is important to assess for negative patient outcomes which may relate to deferral of usual models of care within cardiology