38 research outputs found

    Five-dot patterns in parts 1 to 5 of the Ruff Figural Fluency Test [6,7].

    No full text
    <p>Five-dot patterns in parts 1 to 5 of the Ruff Figural Fluency Test [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0121411#pone.0121411.ref006" target="_blank">6</a>,<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0121411#pone.0121411.ref007" target="_blank">7</a>].</p

    Flowchart of participants who performed the Ruff Figural Fluency Test.

    No full text
    <p>Mean (SD) follow-up time between measurement 1 and 2 was 2.8 (0.5) years and between measurement 2 and 3 2.7 (0.5) years. Abbreviations: RFFT, Ruff Figural Fluency Test.</p

    Characteristics of the study population at measurement 1, 2003–2006.

    No full text
    <p>Abbreviations: RFFT, Ruff Figural Fluency Test; SD, standard deviation; IQR, interquartile range.</p><p>Characteristics of the study population at measurement 1, 2003–2006.</p

    Longitudinal performance on the Ruff Figural Fluency Test per age group.

    No full text
    <p>Abbreviations: RFFT, Ruff Figural Fluency Test; SD, standard deviation; IQR, interquartile range.</p><p><sup>a</sup> Trends across consecutive measurements and age groups were analyzed by ANOVA for the number of unique designs and by Kruskal-Wallis H test for the number of perseverative errors.</p><p><sup>b</sup><i>p</i> value for trend across age groups is <0.001.</p><p><sup>c</sup> Trend across age groups is not statistically significant.</p><p>Longitudinal performance on the Ruff Figural Fluency Test per age group.</p
    corecore