1 research outputs found
Water Oxidation Catalysis Beginning with 2.5 μM [Co<sub>4</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>(PW<sub>9</sub>O<sub>34</sub>)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>10–</sup>: Investigation of the True Electrochemically Driven Catalyst at ≥600 mV Overpotential at a Glassy Carbon Electrode
Evidence for the true water oxidation
catalyst (WOC) when beginning with the cobalt polyoxometalate [Co<sub>4</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>(PW<sub>9</sub>O<sub>34</sub>)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>10–</sup> (Co<sub>4</sub>–POM) is investigated
at deliberately chosen low polyoxometalate concentrations (2.5 μM)
and high electrochemical potentials (≥1.3 V vs Ag/AgCl) in
pH 5.8 and 8.0 sodium phosphate electrolyte at a glassy carbon working
electrodeconditions which ostensibly favor Co<sub>4</sub>–POM
catalysis if present. Multiple experiments argue against the dominant
catalyst being CoO<sub><i>x</i></sub> formed exclusively
from Co<sup>2+</sup> dissociated from the parent POM. Measurement
of [Co<sup>2+</sup>] in the Co<sub>4</sub>–POM solution and
catalytic controls with the corresponding amount of CoÂ(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> cannot account for the O<sub>2</sub> generated from
2.5 μM [Co<sub>4</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>(PW<sub>9</sub>O<sub>34</sub>)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>10–</sup> solutions. This
result contrasts with our prior investigation of Co<sub>4</sub>–POM
under higher concentration and lower potential conditions (i.e., 500
μM [Co<sub>4</sub>(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>(PW<sub>9</sub>O<sub>34</sub>)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>10–</sup>, 1.1 V vs Ag/AgCl,
as described in Stracke, J. J.; Finke, R. G. <i>J. Am. Chem.
Soc.</i> <b>2011</b>, <i>133</i>, 14872) and <i>highlights the importance of</i> <i>reaction</i> <i>conditions in governing the identity of the true, active WOC.</i> Although electrochemical studies are consistent with Co<sub>4</sub>–POM being oxidized at the glassy carbon electrode, it is
not yet possible to distinguish a Co<sub>4</sub>–POM catalyst
from a CoO<sub><i>x</i></sub> catalyst formed via decomposition
of Co<sub>4</sub>–POM. Controls with authentic CoO<sub><i>x</i></sub> indicate conversion of only 3.4% or 8.3% (at pH
8.0 and 5.8) of Co<sub>4</sub>–POM into a CoO<sub><i>x</i></sub> catalyst could account for the O<sub>2</sub>-generating activity,
and HPLC quantification of the Co<sub>4</sub>–POM stability
shows the postreaction Co<sub>4</sub>–POM concentration decreases
by 2.7 ± 7.6% and 9.4 ± 5.1% at pH 8.0 and 5.8. Additionally,
the [Co<sup>2+</sup>] in a 2.5 μM Co<sub>4</sub>–POM
solution increases by 0.55 μM during 3 min of electrolysisfurther
evidence of the <i>Co</i><sub><i>4</i></sub><i>-POM instability under oxidizing conditions</i>. Overall, this
study demonstrates the challenges of identifying the true WOC when
examining micromolar amounts of a partially stable material and when <i>nanomolar</i> heterogeneous metal-oxide will account for the
observed O<sub>2</sub>-generating activity