Unlicensed and off-label drug use in children

Many commercially available drugs are only licensed for use in adults and for many drugs the available formulations are unsuitable for pediatric use.' This reality leads to use of drugs which are unlicensed or off -label for use in children. There are several reasons for this highly unsatisfactory situation. Firstly, children represent only a small market in an absolute sense but also relatively as most children are healthy. Hence, from a commercial perspective it may not be profitable to invest in pediatric drug research. Secondly, fear is growing for unforeseen adverse effects and long-term toxicity which may be difficult to study. Therefore, the current requirements for licensing of a drug may have become a barrier to make proper drugs available to a vulnerable group of patients. Thirdly, there are ethical problems to conduct drug studies in children. In Europe the problems in pediatric drug use and research receive relatively little interest and there is a substantial Jack of funding of pediatric drug research. N. a result, pediatric drug trials are relatively scarce and often include only a limited number of patients. Despite the well-known thalidomide disaster, which happened already forty years ago and caused an epidemic of congenital malformations, very little has changed regarding the labeling of drugs in infants and children. Although the disaster has stimulated legislation of drug licensing, children ironically remain 'therapeutic orphans'. This is difficult to accept because many diseases in adults can also occur in children while pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics often differ. Prescription of drugs should be proven to be equally safe in children as in adnlts, and efficacy of the product should be thoroughly assessed for all probable users. Exposure of infants and children to drugs which are not proven to be safe and efficacious during growth and development, cannot always be prevented. Hence, the health implications of this 'therapeutic orphanhood' may be larger than is sometimes assumed. The scope of this thesis was to assess the extent of the problem of unlicensed and offlabel drug use in children both in clinical care as well as in general practice. Although it is just a first step on a lengthy road, we hope that results of our studies may revive awareness of the problem and stimulate adequate regulatory actions

Unlicensed and off-label prescription of respiratory drugs to children

Many respiratory drugs are not available in formulations suitable for infants and toddlers. Efficacy and safety research is mostly restricted to older children. However, respiratory drugs are frequently used in children for common diseases like asthma, upper and lower respiratory tract infections, rhinitis and sinusitis. The unlicensed and off-label use of respiratory drugs in children were studied. A population-based cohor

Adverse drug reactions in a primary care population prescribed non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Objective. To determine how often patients with musculoskeletal (MSK) complaints prescribed a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) subsequently consult their general practitioner (GP) with a non-serious adverse drug reaction (ADR). Design. Cohort study. Setting. A healthcare database containing the electronic GP medical records of over 1.5 million patients throughout the Netherlands. Patients. A total of 16 626 adult patients with MSK complaints prescribed an NSAID. Main outcome measures. The patients' medical records were manually assessed for the duration of NSAID use for a maximum of two months, and consultations for complaints predefined as potential ADRs were identified. Subsequently, the likelihood of an association with the NSAID use was assessed and these potential ADRs were categorized as likely, possible, or unlikely ADRs. Results. In total, 961 patients (6%) consulted their GP with 1227 non-serious potential ADRs. In 174 patients (1%) at least one of these was categorized as a likely ADR, and in a further 408 patients (2.5%) at least one was categorized as a possible ADR. Dyspepsia was the most frequent likely ADR, followed by diarrhoea and dyspnoea (respectively 34%, 8%, and 8% of all likely ADRs). Conclusion. Of the patients with MSK complaints prescribed an NSAID, almost one in 30 patients re-consulted their GP with a complaint likely or possibly associated with the use of this drug. The burden of such consultations for non-serious ADRs should be taken into account by GPs when deciding whether treatment with an NSAID is appropriate

Antibiotic-Induced Liver Injury in Paediatric Outpatients: A Case-Control Study in Primary Care Databases

Introduction: Antibiotics are the most commonly prescribed drug class in children. Real-world data mining on the paediatric population showed potential associations between antibiotic use and acute liver injury. Objective: We assessed risk estimates of liver injury associated with antibiotic use in children and adolescent outpatients. Methods: A large, multi-database, population-based, case-control study was performed in people <18 years of age from two European countries (Italy and The Netherlands) during the period 2000–2008. All potential cases of liver injury were automatically extracted from three databases and then manually validated based on Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) criteria and by exclusion of all competing causes for liver injury. Up to 100 control participants were sampled for each case and were matched on index date of the event, age, sex and database. Based on prescription data, antibiotic exposure was categorized as current, recent or past use by calculating the time period between the end of prescription and the index date. Multivariate conditional logistic regression analyses were applied to calculate odds ratios (ORs) as a measure of the association (with 95% confidence interval [CI]). Results: We identified 938 cases of liver injury and matched to 93,665 controls. Current use of overall antibiotics is associated with a threefold increased risk of liver injury compared with past use (adjusted OR [ORadj] 3.22, 95% CI 2.57–4.03). With regard to individual antibiotics, the risk is significantly increased for current use of each antibiotic (p < 0.005), except for azithromycin. Risk estimates vary from the lowest ORadj of 1.86 (95% CI 1.08–3.21) for amoxicillin to the highest ORadj of 24.16 (95% CI 11.78–49.54) for cotrimoxazole (i.e. sulphamethoxa

Population-based analysis of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use among children in four European countries in the SOS project: What size of data platforms and which study designs do we need to assess safety issues?

Background: Data on utilization patterns and safety of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in children are scarce. The purpose of this study was to investigate the utilization of NSAIDs among children in four European countries as part of the Safety Of non-Steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (SOS) project.Methods: We used longitudinal patient data from seven databases (GePaRD, IPCI, OSSIFF, Pedianet, PHARMO, SISR, and THIN) to calculate prevalence rates of NSAID use among children (0-18 years of age) from Germany, Italy, Netherlands, and United Kingdom. All databases contained a representative population sample and recorded demographics, diagnoses, and drug prescriptions. Prevalence rates of NSAID use were stratified by age, sex, and calendar time. The person-time of NSAID exposure was calculated by using the duration of the prescription supply. We calculated incidence rates for serious adverse events of interest. For these adverse events of interest, sample size calculations were conducted (alpha = 0.05; 1-beta = 0.8) to determine the amount of NSAID exposure time that would be required for safety studies in children.Results: The source population comprised 7.7 million children with a total of 29.6 million person-years of observation. Of those, 1.3 million children were exposed to at least one of 45 NSAIDs during observation time. Overall prevalence rates of NSAID use in children differed across countries, ranging from 4.4 (Italy) to 197 (Germany) per 1000 person-years in 2007. For Germany, United Kingdom, and Italian pediatricians, we observed high rates of NSAID use among children aged one to four years. For all four countries, NSAID use increased with older age categories for children older than 11. In this analysis, only for ibuprofen (the most frequently used NSAID), enough exposure was available to detect a weak association (relative risk of 2) between exposure and asthma exacerbation (the most common serious adverse event of interest).Conclusions: Patterns of NSAID use in children were heterogeneous across four European countries. The SOS project platform captures data on more than 1.3 million children who were exposed to NSAIDs. Even larger data platforms and the use of advanced versions of case-only study designs may be needed to conclusively assess the safety of these drugs in children

Time-trends in the prescribing of gastroprotective agents to primary care patients initiating low-dose aspirin or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a population-based cohort study

Aims Low-dose aspirin (LDA) and non-steroidal-anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) both increase the risk of upper gastrointestinal events (UGIEs). In the Netherlands, recommendations regarding the prescription of gastroprotective agents (GPAs) in LDA users were first issued in 2009 in the HARM-Wrestling consensus. National guidelines on gastroprotective strategies (GPSs) in NSAID users were issued in the first part of the preceding. The aim of the present study was to examine time-trends in GPSs in patients initiating LDA and those initiating NSAIDs between 2000 and 2012. Methods Within a large electronic primary healthcare database, two cohorts were selected: (i) patients newly prescribed LDA and (ii) patients newly prescribed NSAIDs between 2000 and 2012. Patients who had been prescribed a GPA in the previous six months were excluded. For both cohorts, patients risk of a UGIE was classified as low, moderate or high, based on the HARM-Wrestling consensus, and the presence of an adequate GPSwas determined. Results A total of 37 578 patients were included in the LDA cohort and 352 025 patients in the NSAID cohort. In both cohorts, an increase in GPSs was observed over time, but prescription of GPAs was lower in the LDA cohort. By 2012, an adequate GPS was present in 31.8% of high-risk LDA initiators, vs. 48.0% of high-risk NSAID initiators. Conclusions Despite a comparable risk of UGIEs, GPSs are prescribed less in high-risk LDA initiators than in high-risk NSAID initiators. For both groups of patients, there is still room for improvement in guideline adherence

Inappropriate drug prescribing in older adults: The updated 2002 Beers criteria - A population-based cohort study

Background: In 1997, Beers and colleagues developed explicit criteria for potentially inappropriate drug prescribing in ambulatory older adults aged 65 years and over. Several studies have been performed to estimate the prevalence of inappropriate drug prescribing based on these criteria. In 2002, the criteria were updated. Aims: To examine the extent and trend of inappropriate drug prescribing to ambulatory older adults in the Netherlands between 1997 and 2001, according to the 1997 and the updated Beers criteria. Methods: Data were retrieved from the Integrated Primary Care Information (IPCI) project, a general practice r