21 research outputs found

    Effects of fenofibrate on cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes, with and without prior cardiovascular disease: The Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study.

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: In the FIELD study, comparison of the effect of fenofibrate on cardiovascular disease (CVD) between those with prior CVD and without was a prespecified subgroup analysis. METHODS: The effects of fenofibrate on total CVD events and its components in patients who did (n = 2,131) and did not (n = 7,664) have a history of CVD were computed by Cox proportional hazards modeling and compared by testing for treatment-by-subgroup interaction. The analyses were adjusted for commencement of statins, use of other CVD medications, and baseline covariates. Effects on other CVD end points were explored. RESULTS: Patients with prior CVD were more likely than those without to be male, to be older (by 3.3 years), to have had a history of diabetes for 2 years longer at baseline, and to have diabetic complications, hypertension, and higher rates of use of insulin and CVD medications. Discontinuation of fenofibrate was similar between the subgroups, but more patients with prior CVD than without, and also more placebo than fenofibrate-assigned patients, commenced statin therapy. The borderline difference in the effects of fenofibrate between those who did (hazard ratio [HR] 1.02, 95% CI 0.86-1.20) and did not have prior CVD (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.70-0.94; heterogeneity P = .045) became nonsignificant after adjustment for baseline covariates and other CVD medications (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.81-1.14 vs HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.67-0.90) (heterogeneity P = .06). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings do not support treating patients with fenofibrate differently based on any history of CVD, in line with evidence from other trials

    Risk stratification in the setting of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes 1999-2007

    No full text
    It is unclear if clinician risk stratification has changed with time. The aim of this study was to assess the temporal change in the concordance between patient presenting risk and the intensity of evidence-based therapies received for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes over a 9-year period. Data from 3,562 patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes enrolled in the Australian and New Zealand population of the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) from 1999 to 2007 were analyzed. Patients were stratified to risk groups on the basis of the GRACE risk score for in-hospital mortality. Main outcome measures included in-hospital use of widely accepted evidence-based medications, investigations, and procedures. Invasive management was consistently higher in low-risk patients than in intermediate- or high-risk patients (coronary angiography 66.7% vs 63.5% vs 35.3%,

    Secondary prevention therapies in acute coronary syndrome and relation to outcomes: observational study

    No full text
    Objective To ascertain the use of secondary prevention medications and cardiac rehabilitation after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and the impact on 2-year outcomes.Methods CONCORDANCE (Cooperative National Registry of Acute Coronary care, Guideline Adherence and Clinical Events) is a prospective, observational registry of 41 Australian hospitals. A representative sample of 6859 patients with an ACS and 6 months' follow-up on 31 May 2016 were included. The main outcome measure was use of >= 75% of indicated medications (>= 4/5 (or >= 3/4 if contraindicated) of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker, beta-blocker, lipid-lowering therapy, aspirin and other antiplatelet). Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) included myocardial infarction, stroke or cardiovascular death.Results The mean age was 65 +/- 13 years, 29% were women, and the mean Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score was 106 +/- 30. At discharge, 92% were on aspirin, 93% lipid-lowering therapy, 78% beta-blocker, 74% ACE/angiotensin receptor blocker and 73% a second antiplatelet; 89% were taking >= 75% of medications at discharge, 78% at 6 months and 66% at 2 years. At 6 months, 38% attended cardiac rehabilitation, 58% received dietary advice and 32% of smokers reported quitting. Among 1896 patients followed to 2 years, death/MACE was less frequent among patients on >= 75% v

    Effect of Alirocumab on Lipoprotein(a) and Cardiovascular Risk After Acute Coronary Syndrome

    No full text

    Alirocumab and cardiovascular outcomes after acute coronary syndrome

    No full text
    BACKGROUN

    Effects of alirocumab on types of myocardial infarction: insights from the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial

    No full text

    Alirocumab and Cardiovascular Outcomes after Acute Coronary Syndrome

    No full text
    BACKGROUN

    Effects of alirocumab on types of myocardial infarction: insights from the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial

    No full text

    Alirocumab in patients with polyvascular disease and recent acute coronary syndrome ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial

    No full text
    corecore