Do investors react negatively to democratic elections in emerging markets? [abstract]

Abstract only availableIn 2002, Brazil's bond market fell dramatically at the same time that Brazilian citizens prepared to vote for the left-leaning President Lula. This event prompted political scientists to question why investors reacted so strongly to the Brazilian democratic election. Since then, the common agreement among the discipline has reported that the Brazilian case is not an anomaly, and that investors in emerging market countries do react negatively during election cycles. However, this research suggests that there is no empirical evidence to defend that hypothesis. When comparing the bond spreads of 12 different emerging market countries from 1994 to 2004 during non-election cycles to the countries' bond spreads during a sample of 26 election cycles, there is only a slightly significant effect. Moreover, that effect becomes even less significant when various effects are controlled for. However, this research does find a significant effect in 4 out of the 26 elections. One of these elections is the 2002 Brazilian election of President Lula. Thus, although investors may react negatively to elections in some emerging market countries, there does not seem to be significant evidence to suggest that elections have an effect on bond markets.MU Undergraduate Research Scholars Progra

Corruption, democracy, and economic growth

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]

The Political Economy of Life Satisfaction: Democracy, National Wealth, and Personal Income

Numerous studies examine the micro-dynamics of subjective well-being (SWB) generally, or life satisfaction (LS) more specifically. Others also document the macro determinants of SWB and LS. We propose a model linking the two, in which an individual’s life satisfaction is contingent on (1) personal circumstances, (2) national factors such as democratic governance and the national wealth, and (3) the explicit interaction of these two levels of analysis. We test three sets of hypotheses that arise from this model with compiled data from six waves of the World Values Survey (WVS) data. The empirical evidence we present supports most of the hypotheses, including our novel proposition that both national wealth and democracy reduce the effect of individual personal income on LS