Bland Altman plots for the Owen et al. (33) (weight) for resting energy expenditure predictive equations in Spanish obese women after a 12-week energy-restricted diet intervention (post 12-week diet intervention, n = 78).

<p>Solid line represents the mean difference (bias) between predicted and measured resting energy expenditure (REE). Upper and lower dashed lines represent the 95% limits of agreement (mean difference ±1.96 SD of the difference).</p

Percentage bias for 10 resting energy predictive equations in Spanish obese women before (baseline, n = 78) and after a 12-week energy-restricted diet intervention (post 12-week diet intervention, n = 78).

<p>Data are sorted by mean values at baseline. FFM indicates fat free mass; FM, fat mass; W, weight; W&H, weight and height.</p

Bland Altman plots for the HB 1919 (32) for resting energy expenditure predictive equations in Spanish obese women after a 12-week energy-restricted diet intervention (post 12-week diet intervention, n = 78).

<p>Solid line represents the mean difference (bias) between predicted and measured resting energy expenditure (REE). Upper and lower dashed lines represent the 95% limits of agreement (mean difference ±1.96 SD of the difference).</p

Evaluation of resting energy expenditure (REE) predictive equations in Spanish obese women before (n = 86) and after a 12-week energy-restricted diet intervention (n = 78) based on bias, root mean squared error (RMSE), and percentage accurate prediction.

<p>*As measured.</p>†<p>Mean percentage error between predictive equation and measured value.</p>‡<p>The largest underprediction observed with this predictive equation as a percentage of the measured value.</p>§<p>The largest overprediction observed with this predictive equation as a percentage of the measured value.</p>∥<p>Percentage of women predicted by this predictive equation within 5% of the measured value.</p>¶<p>Percentage of women predicted by this predictive equation within 10% of the measured value.</p>**<p>Percentage of women predicted by this predictive equation <10% of the measured value.</p>††<p>Percentage of women predicted by this predictive equation >10% of the measured value.</p

Resting energy expenditure predictive equations.

<p>Resting energy expenditure predictive equations.</p

Bland Altman plots for the HB 1919 (32) for resting energy expenditure predictive equations in Spanish obese women before a 12-week energy-restricted diet intervention (baseline, n = 78).

<p>Solid line represents the mean difference (bias) between predicted and measured resting energy expenditure (REE). Upper and lower dashed lines represent the 95% limits of agreement (mean difference ±1.96 SD of the difference).</p

Bland Altman plots for the Mifflin et al. (34) (weight) for resting energy expenditure predictive equations in Spanish obese women after a 12-week energy-restricted diet intervention (post 12-week diet intervention, n = 78).

<p>Solid line represents the mean difference (bias) between predicted and measured resting energy expenditure (REE). Upper and lower dashed lines represent the 95% limits of agreement (mean difference ±1.96 SD of the difference).</p

Descriptive characteristics of the study participants before (baseline) and after a 12-week energy-restricted diet intervention.

<p>*BMI, body mass index; sd, standard deviation.</p

Bland Altman plots for the Owen et al. (33) (weight) for resting energy expenditure predictive equations in Spanish obese women before a 12-week energy-restricted diet intervention (baseline, n = 78).

<p>Solid line represents the mean difference (bias) between predicted and measured resting energy expenditure (REE). Upper and lower dashed lines represent the 95% limits of agreement (mean difference ±1.96 SD of the difference).</p

Distribution of individuals in the low-, medium- and high-dose groups with genotypes of very low, low and normal metabolism for 0 up to 5 polymorphisms.

<p>Values are % (n).</p