38 research outputs found

    An App-Based Intervention to Support First Responders and Essential Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Needs Assessment and Mixed Methods Implementation Study

    Get PDF
    The COVID-19 pandemic has created unprecedented challenges for first responders (eg, police, fire, and emergency medical services) and nonmedical essential workers (eg, workers in food, transportation, and other industries). Health systems may be uniquely suited to support these workers given their medical expertise, and mobile apps can reach local communities despite social distancing requirements. Formal evaluation of real-world mobile app–based interventions is lacking

    Humanism in telemedicine: Connecting through virtual visits during the COVID-19 pandemic

    Full text link
    The COVID-19 pandemic is spurring the massive deployment of telemedicine to prevent risk of infection and address healthcare workforce demands. In primary care, many visits have shifted from in-person to telemedicine, introducing a potential barrier to the human connection that is central to clinical care. We adapted existing frameworks that seek to foster humanism in clinical care-the Four Habits Model and Presence 5-to the virtual care context. Reconceptualizing these frameworks to video visits in particular yields strategies for four phases of the visit - (1) Before the Visit: Set up for Success, (2) Beginning the Visit: Establish a Connection, (3) Throughout the Visit: Invest in the Relationship and the Patient's Story, and (4) Completing the Visit: End on a Meaningful Note. Adopting explicit humanistic practices can help clinicians foster meaningful connections with patients through video visits amidst this challenging pandemic and in the future as telemedicine becomes more widely integrated into clinical care.This study was supported by a grant from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (#6382; PIs Donna Zulman and Abraham Verghese). Megha Shankar is supported by a VA Office of Academic Affairs Advanced Fellowship in Health Services Research. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs, the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, or Stanford University School of Medicine.https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/154738/1/Shankar article file.pdfDescription of Shankar article file.pdf : Main articl

    Presence 5 for Racial Justice Workshop: Fostering Dialogue Across Medical Education to Disrupt Anti-Black Racism in Clinical Encounters

    Get PDF
    Introduction: Anti-Black racism has strong roots in American health care and medical education. While curricula on social determinants of health are increasingly common in medical training, curricula directly addressing anti-Black racism are limited. Existing frameworks like the Presence 5 framework for humanism in medicine can be adapted to develop a novel workshop that promotes anti-racism communication. Methods: We performed a literature review of anti-racism collections and categorized anti-racism communication practices using the Presence 5 framework to develop the Presence 5 for Racial Justice Workshop. Implementation included an introductory didactic, a small-group discussion, and a large-group debrief. Participants evaluated the workshop via an online survey, and we analyzed the resulting qualitative feedback. Results: A total of 17 participants took part in two workshops, with nine of the participants responding to the evaluation survey. Themes that emerged from survey responses included strengths of and improvements for the workshop structure (protected time for anti-racism discussion, dialogue between learners and faculty) and content (specific phrases and language, practicing self-reflection). Discussion: The workshop provides participants with a semistructured discussion around the five anti-racism communication practices. Barriers to implementation include incorporating the workshop into existing curricula and ensuring diverse learners. Barriers to evaluating the workshop include the low survey response rate. Recommendations to improve the workshop include using case-based discussion and varying the workshop structure according to institutional needs. Next steps include an implementation study to evaluate the acceptability, feasibility, and effectiveness of the workshop
    corecore