16 research outputs found

    Act now against new NHS competition regulations: an open letter to the BMA and the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges calls on them to make a joint public statement of opposition to the amended section 75 regulations.

    Get PDF

    Challenges in implementing corporate governance: whose business is it anyway?

    No full text
    xv+241hlm.;22c

    Mastering Business in Asia : Corporate Governance

    No full text
    xiv, 376 p : Il.; 23 c

    Islam and CSR: A Study of the Compatibility Between the Tenets of Islam and the UN Global Compact

    No full text
    CSR, Islam, UN Global Compact, Environment, human rights, labour rights,

    Making Law Students Client-Ready: A New Model in Legal Education

    Get PDF
    In the 1870’s, Christopher Columbus Langdell, then Dean of Harvard Law School, introduced the teaching method of studying cases combined with Socratic questioning. It is still the primary method of teaching law in the United States. Although worthy as part of an integrative program of instruction, the Langdellian method, as the primary form of instruction, fails to make law students client-ready. While it may meet \u27the needs of future law clerks and eventual judges, as well as aspiring legal scientists,\u27 it leaves \u27newly admitted lawyers . . . ill-prepared to represent common people who have common legal problems.\u27 This has negative ramifications not only for lawyers, but for \u27everybody who may be affected by the work of lawyers.\u27 Fortunately, numerous comprehensive, authoritative reports call for integrating the Langdellian method with training in professional skills and values. Efforts at reform are being made in various law schools around the country. But change has been slow, and delay means serious negative consequences for law students and the clients they will eventually serve. The Langdellian method not only undertrains students generally, it disproportionately alienates groups traditionally underrepresented in law schools, including women and minorities. Law schools have a duty to their students and to society to provide a legal education that adequately trains law students to represent clients. They have a duty to make legal education a means to greater equality, and not an inhibition. This paper attempts to provide a possible starting point for schools that have not yet begun the move toward integrative education, and an opportunity for further discussion among those schools already in transition. (pp. 102-103
    corecore