243 research outputs found

    Ethical Issues of Stereotyping

    Get PDF
    Stereotyping, particularly negative stereotyping, is an important and pragmatic social issue. Contemporary mores have rightly condemned stereotyping by race, nationality and gender. Stereotyping in medicine has a number of important practical connotations. One of the most important is the attitudinal tradition of medical paternalism. Doctors have often stereotyped patients as subjects not being capable of considering relevant options in their own personal, clinical circumstances - for example, where major surgical intervention might be one course of action. Withholding full information of all the outcomes, and rushing the doctor-patient decision process in such circumstances, constitutes one type of unethical stereotyping

    "Two centuries of service" five special teachers at Milton State School

    Get PDF

    The sugar industry on the Sunshine Coast

    Get PDF

    Clearing the beach : establishing a system of casualty evacuation at Anzac Cove

    Get PDF

    In sundry places : Queensland place names and memorials commemorating Bancroft

    Get PDF

    From an island to the islands : training at Coochiemudlo

    Get PDF

    How we licked them : the role of the philatelic medium

    Get PDF

    “First, Do No Harm”: Old and New Paradigms in Prehospital Resuscitation in the Aquatic Domain

    Get PDF
    The balance between benefit and risk is central to the work of all those involved in aquatic services. The Hippocratic exhortation of Primum non nocere, “First, do no harm,” has a history of over 2000 years. Superficially, all would support this dictum, but harm can result from inaction. The balance between no or little intervention on the one hand and proactive intervention with iatrogenic risk on the other is complex and enduring. Risk implies that one does not have all the information available to know the exact likelihood of an outcome, a common situation involving rescue, first aid, and resuscitation. The theme of Primum non nocere (and its congener, risk-benefit ratios) in the aquatic rescue and resuscitation domain has both ethical (e.g., Good Samaritan) and legal (e.g., tort action) implications. Recently, a reversal in intervention philosophy, “Any attempt at resuscitation is better than no attempt,” has emerged. This aphorism is in stark contrast to the traditionally conservative, “Don’t do anything for which you are untrained.” Current and continuing research audits are needed to assess whether this newer paradigm results in a risk-benefit ratio low enough to counter the traditional Primum non nocere
    • …
    corecore