37 research outputs found

    An example of two camera trapped red foxes with mange-compatible lesions.

    No full text
    <p>An example of two camera trapped red foxes with mange-compatible lesions.</p

    Set of candidate logistic models for the occurrence of red foxes showing mange-compatible lesions in southeastern Norway.

    No full text
    <p>Set of candidate logistic models for the occurrence of red foxes showing mange-compatible lesions in southeastern Norway.</p

    Study area.

    No full text
    <p>Location and extent of three areas (A, B, and C) in southeastern Norway where we studied spatiotemporal patterns of sarcoptic mange in red foxes with camera traps. Gray squares are sampled 10 km<sup>2</sup> cells. Dashed lines are minimum convex polygons around camera locations in each of the study areas.</p

    Spatiotemporal clusters of red foxes potentially infected with sarcoptic mange detected by the scan analyses.

    No full text
    <p>Spatiotemporal clusters of red foxes potentially infected with sarcoptic mange detected by the scan analyses.</p

    Variables used in logistic models of the occurrence of red foxes showing mange-compatible lesions in southeastern Norway.

    No full text
    <p>Variables used in logistic models of the occurrence of red foxes showing mange-compatible lesions in southeastern Norway.</p

    The range of the mange: Spatiotemporal patterns of sarcoptic mange in red foxes (<i>Vulpes vulpes</i>) as revealed by camera trapping

    No full text
    <div><p>Sarcoptic mange is a widely distributed disease that affects numerous mammalian species. We used camera traps to investigate the apparent prevalence and spatiotemporal dynamics of sarcoptic mange in a red fox population in southeastern Norway. We monitored red foxes for five years using 305 camera traps distributed across an 18000 km<sup>2</sup> area. A total of 6581 fox events were examined to visually identify mange compatible lesions. We investigated factors associated with the occurrence of mange by using logistic models within a Bayesian framework, whereas the spatiotemporal dynamics of the disease were analysed with space-time scan statistics. The apparent prevalence of the disease fluctuated over the study period with a mean of 3.15% and credible interval [1.25, 6.37], and our best logistic model explaining the presence of red foxes with mange-compatible lesions included time since the beginning of the study and the interaction between distance to settlement and season as explanatory variables. The scan analyses detected several potential clusters of the disease that varied in persistence and size, and the locations in the cluster with the highest probability were closer to human settlements than the other survey locations. Our results indicate that red foxes in an advanced stage of the disease are most likely found closer to human settlements during periods of low wild prey availability (winter). We discuss different potential causes. Furthermore, the disease appears to follow a pattern of small localized outbreaks rather than sporadic isolated events.</p></div

    Parameter estimates for the best model in the set of candidate models (presented in Table 3).

    No full text
    <p>Parameters are presented on the link-scale (log-link in the negative binomial model; logit-link in the zero-inflation model).</p>*<p>log(<i>theta)</i> parameter of the negative binomial model estimated at 1.498 (seβ€Š=β€Š0.490).</p

    Parameter estimates form the best model (see Table 2) explaining the presence of red foxes with mange-compatible lesions in southeastern Norway.

    No full text
    <p>Parameter estimates form the best model (see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0176200#pone.0176200.t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a>) explaining the presence of red foxes with mange-compatible lesions in southeastern Norway.</p

    Prey found at clusters from Eurasian lynx (<i>Lynx lynx</i>) in south-eastern Norway during summer, 1995–2011, grouped by study area (see text for explanation).

    No full text
    <p>Percentages are based on frequency of occurrence.</p>a<p>Calves.</p>b<p>Lemming (<i>Lemmus lemmus</i>), Brown rat (<i>Rattus norvegicus</i>), 3 red squirrels (<i>Sciurus vulgaris</i>), and 1 Eurasian beaver (<i>Castor fiber</i>).</p>c<p>3 Wood Pigeon (<i>Columba palumbus</i>), 1 Meadow Pipit (<i>Anthus pratensis</i>), 6 unknown birds.</p>d<p>2 moose carcasses, 1 roe deer carcass.</p
    corecore