Association between social capital and utilisation of adolescent/youth corners).

Association between social capital and utilisation of adolescent/youth corners).</p

S1 Dataset -

Social capital, often seen as the resources accessed through social connections, is currently gaining much attention in public health. However, limited studies have focused on the relationship between social capital and reproductive health services. Besides, while the factors associated with the use of reproductive health services among the youth are well documented in the literature, most studies have focused on narrowed perspective failing to take cognisance of the role of social capital. Yet, it is known that these behaviours can be influenced by social factors, which may be beyond the individual’s control partly because the youth are embedded in social organisations. Therefore, this study examined the relationship between social capital and the youth’s utilisation of reproductive health services.The study population comprised adolescents and young adults aged 15–24 years who were both in and out of school at the time of the survey. The study used a cross-sectional quantitative design involving a community-based household survey method to sample 792 respondents through multi-stage cluster sampling. The chi-square test examined the relationship between sociodemographic, social capital variables and reproductive health services. To account for potential confounding factors, a multivariable logistic regression model included variables from the binary logistic regression analysis with a p-value less than 0.05. In general, access to higher social capital was observed among 493 (62.2%). Almost half, 385 (48.6%) of the respondents have ever used at least one of the reproductive services examined in this study. After controlling all other significant predictors, the following social capital variables remained associated with increased utilisation of SRH services: higher trust in neighbourhood (AOR = 1.8; CI = 1.22–2.66), higher trust in people/institutions (AOR = 2.66; CI = 1.82–3.99), higher social cohesion (AOR = 3.35; CI = 2.21–5.08), stronger network (AOR = 7.55; CI = 4.43–12.87).Access to some social capital dimensions is associated with increased use of reproductive health services. However, any intervention such as mentoring including peer support programs, meant to address social capital needs in sexual and reproductive health should consider the efficacy of each social capital dimension and the intervention’s environment.</div

Demographic characteristics of respondents.

Social capital, often seen as the resources accessed through social connections, is currently gaining much attention in public health. However, limited studies have focused on the relationship between social capital and reproductive health services. Besides, while the factors associated with the use of reproductive health services among the youth are well documented in the literature, most studies have focused on narrowed perspective failing to take cognisance of the role of social capital. Yet, it is known that these behaviours can be influenced by social factors, which may be beyond the individual’s control partly because the youth are embedded in social organisations. Therefore, this study examined the relationship between social capital and the youth’s utilisation of reproductive health services.The study population comprised adolescents and young adults aged 15–24 years who were both in and out of school at the time of the survey. The study used a cross-sectional quantitative design involving a community-based household survey method to sample 792 respondents through multi-stage cluster sampling. The chi-square test examined the relationship between sociodemographic, social capital variables and reproductive health services. To account for potential confounding factors, a multivariable logistic regression model included variables from the binary logistic regression analysis with a p-value less than 0.05. In general, access to higher social capital was observed among 493 (62.2%). Almost half, 385 (48.6%) of the respondents have ever used at least one of the reproductive services examined in this study. After controlling all other significant predictors, the following social capital variables remained associated with increased utilisation of SRH services: higher trust in neighbourhood (AOR = 1.8; CI = 1.22–2.66), higher trust in people/institutions (AOR = 2.66; CI = 1.82–3.99), higher social cohesion (AOR = 3.35; CI = 2.21–5.08), stronger network (AOR = 7.55; CI = 4.43–12.87).Access to some social capital dimensions is associated with increased use of reproductive health services. However, any intervention such as mentoring including peer support programs, meant to address social capital needs in sexual and reproductive health should consider the efficacy of each social capital dimension and the intervention’s environment.</div

Utilisation of SRH services and adolescent/youth friendly corners.

Utilisation of SRH services and adolescent/youth friendly corners.</p

Association between social capital variables and utilisation of SRH services.

Association between social capital variables and utilisation of SRH services.</p

Reasons for non-utilisation of AYFC among the youth.

Reasons for non-utilisation of AYFC among the youth.</p

Contains question that were used for the study.

Social capital, often seen as the resources accessed through social connections, is currently gaining much attention in public health. However, limited studies have focused on the relationship between social capital and reproductive health services. Besides, while the factors associated with the use of reproductive health services among the youth are well documented in the literature, most studies have focused on narrowed perspective failing to take cognisance of the role of social capital. Yet, it is known that these behaviours can be influenced by social factors, which may be beyond the individual’s control partly because the youth are embedded in social organisations. Therefore, this study examined the relationship between social capital and the youth’s utilisation of reproductive health services.The study population comprised adolescents and young adults aged 15–24 years who were both in and out of school at the time of the survey. The study used a cross-sectional quantitative design involving a community-based household survey method to sample 792 respondents through multi-stage cluster sampling. The chi-square test examined the relationship between sociodemographic, social capital variables and reproductive health services. To account for potential confounding factors, a multivariable logistic regression model included variables from the binary logistic regression analysis with a p-value less than 0.05. In general, access to higher social capital was observed among 493 (62.2%). Almost half, 385 (48.6%) of the respondents have ever used at least one of the reproductive services examined in this study. After controlling all other significant predictors, the following social capital variables remained associated with increased utilisation of SRH services: higher trust in neighbourhood (AOR = 1.8; CI = 1.22–2.66), higher trust in people/institutions (AOR = 2.66; CI = 1.82–3.99), higher social cohesion (AOR = 3.35; CI = 2.21–5.08), stronger network (AOR = 7.55; CI = 4.43–12.87).Access to some social capital dimensions is associated with increased use of reproductive health services. However, any intervention such as mentoring including peer support programs, meant to address social capital needs in sexual and reproductive health should consider the efficacy of each social capital dimension and the intervention’s environment.</div

Access and distribution of social capital.

Social capital, often seen as the resources accessed through social connections, is currently gaining much attention in public health. However, limited studies have focused on the relationship between social capital and reproductive health services. Besides, while the factors associated with the use of reproductive health services among the youth are well documented in the literature, most studies have focused on narrowed perspective failing to take cognisance of the role of social capital. Yet, it is known that these behaviours can be influenced by social factors, which may be beyond the individual’s control partly because the youth are embedded in social organisations. Therefore, this study examined the relationship between social capital and the youth’s utilisation of reproductive health services.The study population comprised adolescents and young adults aged 15–24 years who were both in and out of school at the time of the survey. The study used a cross-sectional quantitative design involving a community-based household survey method to sample 792 respondents through multi-stage cluster sampling. The chi-square test examined the relationship between sociodemographic, social capital variables and reproductive health services. To account for potential confounding factors, a multivariable logistic regression model included variables from the binary logistic regression analysis with a p-value less than 0.05. In general, access to higher social capital was observed among 493 (62.2%). Almost half, 385 (48.6%) of the respondents have ever used at least one of the reproductive services examined in this study. After controlling all other significant predictors, the following social capital variables remained associated with increased utilisation of SRH services: higher trust in neighbourhood (AOR = 1.8; CI = 1.22–2.66), higher trust in people/institutions (AOR = 2.66; CI = 1.82–3.99), higher social cohesion (AOR = 3.35; CI = 2.21–5.08), stronger network (AOR = 7.55; CI = 4.43–12.87).Access to some social capital dimensions is associated with increased use of reproductive health services. However, any intervention such as mentoring including peer support programs, meant to address social capital needs in sexual and reproductive health should consider the efficacy of each social capital dimension and the intervention’s environment.</div