Appendix B. Number of arthropods collected per gap in treatment and control canopy gaps of three sizes in a bottomland hardwood forest in South Carolina (2002–2003).

Number of arthropods collected per gap in treatment and control canopy gaps of three sizes in a bottomland hardwood forest in South Carolina (2002–2003)

Appendix C. Mean arthropod abundance for all arthropods by treatment and period in six treated and six control canopy gaps at the Savannah River Site, South Carolina (2002–2003).

Mean arthropod abundance for all arthropods by treatment and period in six treated and six control canopy gaps at the Savannah River Site, South Carolina (2002–2003)

Appendix D. Number of individuals of each species (excluding recaptures) captured in experimental canopy gaps in South Carolina (2002–2003).

Number of individuals of each species (excluding recaptures) captured in experimental canopy gaps in South Carolina (2002–2003)

Appendix E. Percentage of vegetation cover and stem density in six treatment and six control canopy gaps at the Savannah River Site, South Carolina (2002–2003).

Percentage of vegetation cover and stem density in six treatment and six control canopy gaps at the Savannah River Site, South Carolina (2002–2003)

Appendix A. Mean arthropod abundance in six treated and six control canopy gaps by year at the Savannah River Site, South Carolina (2002–2003).

Mean arthropod abundance in six treated and six control canopy gaps by year at the Savannah River Site, South Carolina (2002–2003)

Number of mortalities by week of life among radiocollared neonatal white-tailed deer at Fort Bragg Military Installation, North Carolina, 2011–2012.

<p>Number of mortalities by week of life among radiocollared neonatal white-tailed deer at Fort Bragg Military Installation, North Carolina, 2011–2012.</p

Set of competing models (within 2 ΔAICc of top model) that includes biological covariates influencing neonatal white-tailed deer survival at Fort Bragg Military Installation, North Carolina, 2011–2012.

<p>Set of competing models (within 2 ΔAICc of top model) that includes biological covariates influencing neonatal white-tailed deer survival at Fort Bragg Military Installation, North Carolina, 2011–2012.</p

Summed Akaike weights (from competing models) for each biological covariate affecting neonatal white-tailed deer survival in the first 10 days of life at Fort Bragg Military Installation, North Carolina, 2011–2012.

<p>Summed Akaike weights (from competing models) for each biological covariate affecting neonatal white-tailed deer survival in the first 10 days of life at Fort Bragg Military Installation, North Carolina, 2011–2012.</p

Weekly survival estimates for radiocollared neonatal white-tailed deer (solid line) and number of coyote kills per week (dashed line) at Fort Bragg Military Installation, North Carolina, 2011–2012.

<p>Weekly survival estimates for radiocollared neonatal white-tailed deer (solid line) and number of coyote kills per week (dashed line) at Fort Bragg Military Installation, North Carolina, 2011–2012.</p

Summed Akaike weights (from competing models) for each biological covariate affecting neonatal white-tailed deer survival at Fort Bragg Military Installation, North Carolina, 2011–2012.

<p>Summed Akaike weights (from competing models) for each biological covariate affecting neonatal white-tailed deer survival at Fort Bragg Military Installation, North Carolina, 2011–2012.</p