Further validation of the 5-item Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions (PEPPI-5) scale in patients with osteoarthritis

Objective\ud To examine the structural validity, internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and construct validity of the 5-item Perceived Efficacy in Patient–Physician Interactions (PEPPI-5) scale in patients with osteoarthritis (OA).\ud \ud Methods\ud A cross-sectional sample of 224 outpatients with OA completed a survey containing the Dutch PEPPI-5 and other standardized measures assessing perceived health-management skills, general self-efficacy, social support, and health-related quality of life. A subsample of 100 patients completed the PEPPI-5 again approximately 3 weeks later.\ud \ud Results\ud Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated good fit for a unidimensional model of the PEPPI-5. Additionally, the scale showed high internal consistency (α = 0.92) and fair test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.68). As hypothesized, the PEPPI-5 was strongly correlated with perceived health-management skills, moderately with social support and psychosocial aspects of health, and not with physical aspects of health. Contrary to expectations, however, it was not correlated with general self-efficacy.\ud \ud Conclusion\ud The Dutch PEPPI-5 demonstrated adequate validity and reliability in patients with OA\u

Long‐term outcome of juvenile idiopathic arthritis following a placebo‐controlled trial: sustained benefits of early sulfasalazine treatment

Objectives: A previous 24- week randomised trial demonstrated that sulfasalazine ( SSZ) treatment was superior to placebo ( PLAC) in suppressing disease activity in patients with oligo- and polyarticular onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis ( JIA). The current study determines the long- term outcome of the trial participants and evaluates whether the benefits of SSZ allocation are sustained over time. Methods: Between 2001 and 2003, 32 SSZ and 29 PLAC patients ( 90% of all patients) were prospectively examined clinically and by chart review, median 9 years ( range 7 to 10) after trial inclusion. In the follow- up assessment, variables of the American College of Rheumatology Pediatric 30 ( ACR Pedi 30) criteria were collected. The assessor was blinded to trial treatment allocation. Results: After the trial, patients had been routinely followed in rheumatology referral centres, and treated at the discretion of the attending physician. Almost all patients continued or started disease- modifying antirheumatic drugs ( DMARDs) ( SSZ 91%, PLAC 93%; SSZ treatment in about 80%). DMARD treatment appeared less intensive in the SSZ group as evidenced by a significantly shorter duration of SSZ use ( median 2.5 vs 5.2 years; p = 0.02) and a trend towards less use of methotrexate and other DMARDs. More than onethird of the patients reported long periods of non- compliance with DMARD treatment in both groups. At follow- up, 74% of the patients had active joints, and 30% showed active polyarthritis. Almost all outcome scores were better for SSZ compared with PLAC patients. Differences ( often exceeding 50%) were significant for the number of active joints, patients' overall well- being, number of patients with episodes of clinical remission off medication ( CROM) and duration of these episodes, patients in CROM and ACR Pedi 30 response at follow- up. Additional exploratory analyses performed to detect potential confounders related to patient characteristics or follow- up treatment showed that DMARD treatment compliance was positively correlated with an ACR Pedi 30 response ( odds ratio 3.8, 95% confidence interval ( CI) 1.1 to 13.4; p = 0.03). Adjusted for compliance, an SSZ patient was 4.2 times as likely as a PLAC patient to be an ACR Pedi 30 responder at follow- up ( 95% CI 1.3 to 14.3; p = 0.02). Conclusions: This follow- up study shows that effective suppression of disease activity by SSZ treatment early in active disease in JIA patients has beneficial effects that persist for many years. Given these results, compliance with DMARD treatment deserves serious attention

Impairment in work and activities of daily life in patients with psoriasis: results of the prospective BioCAPTURE registry

AbstractBackground: Little is known about the extent of impairments in work and activities of daily life (ADL) in patients with psoriasis, and the influence of contextual factors such as disease-related characteristics and treatment. Therefore, this study aimed to assess these impairments in patients with psoriasis who started using biologicals/small molecule inhibitors.Methods: Using data from the prospective BioCAPTURE registry, we collected patient, disease, and treatment parameters, as well as work/ADL impairments at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Changes in impairment parameters and correlations between impairment and patient/disease characteristics were assessed using generalized estimating equations.Results: We included 194 patients in our analysis. After biological initiation, disease activity decreased significantly (PASI 11.2 at baseline versus 3.9 at 12 months, p < 0.001). Work-for-pay in this cohort was lower than in the Dutch general population (53% versus 67%, p = 0.01). In patients who had work-for-pay, presenteeism improved over time (5% at baseline versus 0% at 12 months, p = 0.04). Up to half of the patients reported impairments in ADL, which did not change over time. Associations between impairments and contextual factors varied, but all impairments were associated with worse mental/physical general functioning.Conclusion: Patients with psoriasis using biologicals are less likely to have work-for-pay. Treatment improves the work productivity of employed patients, but we were unable to detect changes in ADL performance

Impairment in work and activities of daily life in patients with psoriasis: results of the prospective BioCAPTURE registry

Background: Little is known about the extent of impairments in work and activities of daily life (ADL) in patients with psoriasis, and the influence of contextual factors such as disease-related characteristics and treatment. Therefore, this study aimed to assess these impairments in patients with psoriasis who started using biologicals/small molecule inhibitors. Methods: Using data from the prospective BioCAPTURE registry, we collected patient, disease, and treatment parameters, as well as work/ADL impairments at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Changes in impairment parameters and correlations between impairment and patient/disease characteristics were assessed using generalized estimating equations. Results: We included 194 patients in our analysis. After biological initiation, disease activity decreased significantly (PASI 11.2 at baseline versus 3.9 at 12 months, p p = 0.01). In patients who had work-for-pay, presenteeism improved over time (5% at baseline versus 0% at 12 months, p = 0.04). Up to half of the patients reported impairments in ADL, which did not change over time. Associations between impairments and contextual factors varied, but all impairments were associated with worse mental/physical general functioning. Conclusion: Patients with psoriasis using biologicals are less likely to have work-for-pay. Treatment improves the work productivity of employed patients, but we were unable to detect changes in ADL performance.</p