Anomalies de la tolérance au glucose chez les patients atteints de fibrose kystique Nouveaux facteurs de risque

Introduction : La fibrose kystique (FK) est une maladie génétique qui atteint plusieurs organes dont le pancréas, le foie et les poumons. Elle s’exprime par une accumulation de mucus visqueux qui va entraîner une altération des fonctions de ces organes. Les progrès scientifiques ont permis d’améliorer la condition de vie et d’augmenter considérablement l’espérance de vie des patients atteints de FK. L’amélioration de l’espérance de vie des patients FK est associée à l’apparition d’anomalies de la tolérance au glucose précédant l’apparition du diabète associé à la FK (DAFK). Le DAFK présente des similitudes avec le diabète de type 1 [DT1] (faible poids, faible sécrétion d’insuline) et le diabète de type 2 [DT2] (intolérance au glucose, anomalies de la sensibilité à l’insuline), mais il est spécifique pour ses causes et ses conséquences. Le DAFK est associé à un risque accru de perte de poids, de réduction de la fonction pulmonaire et de mortalité précoce et touche 50 % des patients adultes. La principale cause de ce diabète est décrite par une sécrétion d'insuline réduite et retardée. Les facteurs de risque, menant au développement du DAFK et les conséquences de son apparition ne sont pas encore bien comprises. La diète (riche en lipides et en énergie) recommandée en FK visant à maintenir un poids adéquat pourrait être responsable de l’accumulation de graisse ectopique, de résistance à l’insuline, de stéatose hépatique et d’anomalies du bilan lipidique rapportés en FK. Pour les patients sans FK, ces anomalies sont associées au développement du DT2. Objectif : Le but de ce travail de thèse visait à l’identification de nouveaux facteurs de risque d’anomalies de la tolérance au glucose dans une population d’adultes atteints de FK. Méthode : Pour cela nous avons i) observé l’évolution de la sécrétion d’insuline chez les patients FK âgés ; ii) identifié l’association entre les enzymes hépatiques et la prévalence du DAFK ; iii) identifié la prévalence de dyslipidémie chez les patients FK adultes et l’association avec le risque de développement du DAFK. Résultats : Nos résultats ont montré que les patients FK adultes présentent une sécrétion d’insuline altérée, mais qu’elle ne se dégrade pas davantage sur une décennie. Par contre, sur la même période, les patients deviennent plus résistants à l’insuline. Nous avons mis en évidence l’existence d’une relation entre le niveau d’enzymes alanine aminotransférase (ALT) élevé et la prévalence de DAFK. Enfin, nous avons montré l’existence d’une forte prévalence de dyslipidémie en FK, mais ces anomalies ne sont pas associées à la survenue du DAFK. Conclusion : Ces travaux ont permis de mieux comprendre l’association entre différents facteurs de risque en lien avec les anomalies de la tolérance au glucose chez des patients adultes FK. Nous avons identifié un mécanisme et un possible biomarqueur du DAFK, les enzymes hépatiques ALT, chez les patients FK adultes. Ces données peuvent fournir un rationnel pertinent pour la poursuite d’autres études cliniques dans le but d’améliorer la qualité de vie des patients atteints de FK.Introduction: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a genetic disorder that affects several organs including the pancreas, liver, and lungs. It is expressed by an accumulation of viscous mucus which will cause an impairment of the functions of these organs. Scientific advances have improved the condition of life and significantly increased the life expectancy of patients with CF. This improved life expectancy of CF patients is associated with the onset of glucose tolerance abnormalities before the onset of CF-associated diabetes (CFRD). CFRD has similarities with type 1 diabetes [T1D] (low body weight, low insulin secretion) and type 2 diabetes [T2D] (glucose intolerance, abnormal insulin sensitivity), but it is specific for its causes and consequences. CFRD is associated with an increased risk of weight loss, reduced lung function and early mortality and affects 50% of adult patients. The main cause of this diabetes is described as a reduced and delayed insulin secretion. The risk factors leading to the development of CFRD and the consequences of its appearance are not well understood. The diet (rich in lipids and energy) recommended in CF, that aims at maintaining an adequate body weight, could be responsible for the accumulation of ectopic fat, insulin resistance, fatty liver and abnormalities of the lipid balance reported in FK. For patients without CF these anomalies are associated with the development of T2D. Objective: The aim of this thesis work was to identify new risk factors for abnormal glucose tolerance in a population of adults with CF. Method: For this we have i) observed the evolution of insulin secretion in elderly CF patients; ii) identified the association between liver enzymes and the prevalence of CFRD; iii) studied the prevalence of dyslipidemia in adult CF patients and the association with the risk of developing CFRD. Results: Our results have shown that adult CF patients have impaired insulin secretion, but it has not degraded further over a decade. However, over the same period, patients become more resistant to insulin. We have highlighted a relationship between the high alanine aminotransferase (ALT) enzyme level and the prevalence of CFRD. Finally, we have shown the existence of a high prevalence of dyslipidemia in CF but these anomalies are not associated with the occurrence of CFRD. Conclusion: This work has made possible to better understand the association between different risk factors linked to glucose tolerance abnormalities in adult CF patients. We have identified a mechanism and a possible biomarker, ALT hepatic enzyme, of CFRD in adult CF patients. These data may provide a relevant rationale for the pursuit of other clinical studies in order to improve the quality of life of patients with CF

Determinants of enhanced vulnerability to coronavirus disease 2019 in UK patients with cancer: a European study

Despite high contagiousness and rapid spread, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has led to heterogeneous outcomes across affected nations. Within Europe (EU), the United Kingdom (UK) is the most severely affected country, with a death toll in excess of 100,000 as of January 2021. We aimed to compare the national impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on the risk of death in UK patients with cancer versus those in continental EU. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of the OnCovid study database, a European registry of patients with cancer consecutively diagnosed with COVID-19 in 27 centres from 27th February to 10th September 2020. We analysed case fatality rates and risk of death at 30 days and 6 months stratified by region of origin (UK versus EU). We compared patient characteristics at baseline including oncological and COVID-19-specific therapy across UK and EU cohorts and evaluated the association of these factors with the risk of adverse outcomes in multivariable Cox regression models. Findings: Compared with EU (n = 924), UK patients (n = 468) were characterised by higher case fatality rates (40.38% versus 26.5%, p < 0.0001) and higher risk of death at 30 days (hazard ratio [HR], 1.64 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.36-1.99]) and 6 months after COVID-19 diagnosis (47.64% versus 33.33%; p < 0.0001; HR, 1.59 [95% CI, 1.33-1.88]). UK patients were more often men, were of older age and have more comorbidities than EU counterparts (p < 0.01). Receipt of anticancer therapy was lower in UK than in EU patients (p < 0.001). Despite equal proportions of complicated COVID-19, rates of intensive care admission and use of mechanical ventilation, UK patients with cancer were less likely to receive anti-COVID-19 therapies including corticosteroids, antivirals and interleukin-6 antagonists (p < 0.0001). Multivariable analyses adjusted for imbalanced prognostic factors confirmed the UK cohort to be characterised by worse risk of death at 30 days and 6 months, independent of the patient's age, gender, tumour stage and status; number of comorbidities; COVID-19 severity and receipt of anticancer and anti-COVID-19 therapy. Rates of permanent cessation of anticancer therapy after COVID-19 were similar in the UK and EU cohorts. Interpretation: UK patients with cancer have been more severely impacted by the unfolding of the COVID-19 pandemic despite societal risk mitigation factors and rapid deferral of anticancer therapy. The increased frailty of UK patients with cancer highlights high-risk groups that should be prioritised for anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Continued evaluation of long-term outcomes is warranted

Impact of 1h oral glucose tolerance test on the clinical status of adult cystic fibrosis patients over a 4-year period.

ObjectiveTo report the clinical profile associated with G60 and I60 over a 4-year prospective observational period in 2 large cohorts of adult patients with CF.Methods319 patients were included (210 Canadian and 119 French) and classified according to their inclusion G60 (≥ or ResultsHigh G60 was not associated to a lower FEV1 at inclusion and the follow-up decline was not higher in the high G60 group (Coefficient [95% CI]: -3.4 [-7.4;0.6], p = 0.0995.). There was no significant association between BMI and G60. Patients with high I60 tended to have a higher mean BMI (+0.5 kg/m2 [0.0 to 1.1], p = 0.05) but no interaction over time was observed.ConclusionsHigh G60 is not associated with a lower lung function at inclusion nor its decline over a 4-year follow-up. High I60 is slightly associated to a higher weight at inclusion, but not with BMI evolution over time in adult patients

Hepatic enzyme ALT as a marker of glucose abnormality in men with cystic fibrosis.

AimCystic fibrosis (CF) patients are at high risk of developing CF-related diabetes (CFRD). In non-CF patients, liver disease, specifically steatosis and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), is strongly associated with type 2 diabetes. We compared glycemic status and metabolic profiles in CF patients according to a biomarker of hepatic injury, alanine aminotransferase (ALT).MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study among 273 adult CF patients recruited from the Montreal CF Cohort. A 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed to collect glucose and insulin measures every 30 minutes. Fasting ALT levels and anthropometric measures were also obtained. Patients were categorized into 2 groups based on ALT cut-off of 25 U/L.ResultsPatients in the high ALT group were mostly men (83%), had higher mean weight and BMI (pConclusionsAdult CF men with higher ALT show an increased frequency of dysglycemia and de novo CFRD, lower insulin sensitivity and higher eight. Our data suggests that ALT levels could be an interesting tool to guide targeted diabetes screening, particularly among CF men. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these observations

EpCAMhigh and EpCAMlow circulating tumor cells in metastatic prostate and breast cancer patients

The presence of high expressing epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAMhigh) circulating tumor cells (CTC) enumerated by CellSearch® in blood of cancer patients is strongly associated with poor prognosis. This raises the question about the presence and relation with clinical outcome of low EpCAM expressing CTC (EpCAMlow CTC). In the EU-FP7 CTC-Trap program, we investigated the presence of EpCAMhigh and EpCAMlow CTC using CellSearch, followed by microfiltration of the EpCAMhigh CTC depleted blood. Blood samples of 108 castration-resistant prostate cancer patients and 22 metastatic breast cancer patients were processed at six participating sites, using protocols and tools developed in the CTC-Trap program. Of the prostate cancer patients, 53% had ≥5 EpCAMhigh CTC and 28% had ≥5 EpCAMlow CTC. For breast cancer patients, 32% had ≥5 EpCAMhigh CTC and 36% had ≥5 EpCAMlow CTC. 70% of prostate cancer patients and 64% of breast cancer patients had in total ≥5 EpCAMhigh and/or EpCAMlow CTC, increasing the number of patients in whom CTC are detected. Castration-resistant prostate cancer patients with ≥5 EpCAMhigh CTC had shorter overall survival versus those with <5 EpCAMhigh CTC (p = 0.000). However, presence of EpCAMlow CTC had no relation with overall survival. This emphasizes the importance to demonstrate the relation with clinical outcome when presence of CTC identified with different technologies are reported, as different CTC subpopulations can have different relations with clinical outcome

Prevalence and impact of COVID-19 sequelae on treatment and survival of patients with cancer who recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection: evidence from the OnCovid retrospective, multicentre registry study

Background: The medium-term and long-term impact of COVID-19 in patients with cancer is not yet known. In this study, we aimed to describe the prevalence of COVID-19 sequelae and their impact on the survival of patients with cancer. We also aimed to describe patterns of resumption and modifications of systemic anti-cancer therapy following recovery from SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods: OnCovid is an active European registry study enrolling consecutive patients aged 18 years or older with a history of solid or haematological malignancy and who had a diagnosis of RT-PCR confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. For this retrospective study, patients were enrolled from 35 institutions across Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK. Patients who were diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection between Feb 27, 2020, and Feb 14, 2021, and entered into the registry at the point of data lock (March 1, 2021), were eligible for analysis. The present analysis was focused on COVID-19 survivors who underwent clinical reassessment at each participating institution. We documented prevalence of COVID-19 sequelae and described factors associated with their development and their association with post-COVID-19 survival, which was defined as the interval from post-COVID-19 reassessment to the patients' death or last follow-up. We also evaluated resumption of systemic anti-cancer therapy in patients treated within 4 weeks of COVID-19 diagnosis. The OnCovid study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04393974. Findings: 2795 patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection between Feb 27, 2020, and Feb 14, 2021, were entered into the study by the time of the data lock on March 1, 2021. After the exclusion of ineligible patients, the final study population consisted of 2634 patients. 1557 COVID-19 survivors underwent a formal clinical reassessment after a median of 22·1 months (IQR 8·4-57·8) from cancer diagnosis and 44 days (28-329) from COVID-19 diagnosis. 234 (15·0%) patients reported COVID-19 sequelae, including respiratory symptoms (116 [49·6%]) and residual fatigue (96 [41·0%]). Sequelae were more common in men (vs women; p=0·041), patients aged 65 years or older (vs other age groups; p=0·048), patients with two or more comorbidities (vs one or none; p=0·0006), and patients with a history of smoking (vs no smoking history; p=0·0004). Sequelae were associated with hospitalisation for COVID-19 (p&lt;0·0001), complicated COVID-19 (p&lt;0·0001), and COVID-19 therapy (p=0·0002). With a median post-COVID-19 follow-up of 128 days (95% CI 113-148), COVID-19 sequelae were associated with an increased risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] 1·80 [95% CI 1·18-2·75]) after adjusting for time to post-COVID-19 reassessment, sex, age, comorbidity burden, tumour characteristics, anticancer therapy, and COVID-19 severity. Among 466 patients on systemic anti-cancer therapy, 70 (15·0%) permanently discontinued therapy, and 178 (38·2%) resumed treatment with a dose or regimen adjustment. Permanent treatment discontinuations were independently associated with an increased risk of death (HR 3·53 [95% CI 1·45-8·59]), but dose or regimen adjustments were not (0·84 [0·35-2·02]). Interpretation: Sequelae post-COVID-19 affect up to 15% of patients with cancer and adversely affect survival and oncological outcomes after recovery. Adjustments to systemic anti-cancer therapy can be safely pursued in treatment-eligible patients

Determinants of enhanced vulnerability to coronavirus disease 2019 in UK patients with cancer: a European study

Background: Despite high contagiousness and rapid spread, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has led to heterogeneous outcomes across affected nations. Within Europe (EU), the United Kingdom (UK) is the most severely affected country, with a death toll in excess of 100,000 as of January 2021. We aimed to compare the national impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on the risk of death in UK patients with cancer versus those in continental EU. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of the OnCovid study database, a European registry of patients with cancer consecutively diagnosed with COVID-19 in 27 centres from 27th February to 10th September 2020. We analysed case fatality rates and risk of death at 30 days and 6 months stratified by region of origin (UK versus EU). We compared patient characteristics at baseline including oncological and COVID-19especific therapy across UK D.J. Pinato et al. / European Journal of Cancer 150 (2021) 190e202 191 and EU cohorts and evaluated the association of these factors with the risk of adverse outcomes in multivariable Cox regression models. Findings: Compared with EU (n Z 924), UK patients (n Z 468) were characterised by higher case fatality rates (40.38% versus 26.5%, p < 0.0001) and higher risk of death at 30 days (hazard ratio [HR], 1.64 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.36e1.99]) and 6 months after COVID-19 diagnosis (47.64% versus 33.33%; p < 0.0001; HR, 1.59 [95% CI, 1.33e1.88]). UK patients were more often men, were of older age and have more comorbidities than EU counterparts (p < 0.01). Receipt of anticancer therapy was lower in UK than in EU patients (p < 0.001). Despite equal proportions of complicated COVID-19, rates of intensive care admission and use of mechanical ventilation, UK patients with cancer were less likely to receive anti eCOVID-19 therapies including corticosteroids, antivirals and interleukin-6 antagonists (p < 0.0001). Multivariable analyses adjusted for imbalanced prognostic factors confirmed the UK cohort to be characterised by worse risk of death at 30 days and 6 months, independent of the patient\u2019s age, gender, tumour stage and status; number of comorbidities; COVID- 19 severity and receipt of anticancer and antieCOVID-19 therapy. Rates of permanent cessation of anticancer therapy after COVID-19 were similar in the UK and EU cohorts. Interpretation: UK patients with cancer have been more severely impacted by the unfolding of the COVID-19 pandemic despite societal risk mitigation factors and rapid deferral of anticancer therapy. The increased frailty of UK patients with cancer highlights high-risk groups that should be prioritised for antieSARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Continued evaluation of long-term outcomes is warranted

Time-Dependent COVID-19 Mortality in Patients with Cancer:An Updated Analysis of the OnCovid Registry

IMPORTANCE: Whether the severity and mortality of COVID-19 in patients with cancer have improved in terms of disease management and capacity is yet to be defined. OBJECTIVE: To test whether severity and mortality from COVID-19 among patients with cancer have improved during the course of the pandemic. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: OnCovid is a European registry that collects data on consecutive patients with solid or hematologic cancer and COVID-19. This multicenter case series study included real-world data from 35 institutions across 6 countries (UK, Italy, Spain, France, Belgium, and Germany). This update included patients diagnosed between February 27, 2020, and February, 14, 2021. Inclusion criteria were confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection and a history of solid or hematologic cancer. EXPOSURES: SARS-CoV-2 infection. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Deaths were differentiated at 14 days and 3 months as the 2 landmark end points. Patient characteristics and outcomes were compared by stratifying patients across 5 phases (February to March 2020, April to June 2020, July to September 2020, October to December 2020, and January to February 2021) and across 2 major outbreaks (February to June 2020 and July 2020 to February 2021). RESULTS: At data cutoff, 2795 consecutive patients were included, with 2634 patients eligible for analysis (median [IQR] age, 68 [18-77] years ; 52.8% men). Eligible patients demonstrated significant time-dependent improvement in 14-day case-fatality rate (CFR) with estimates of 29.8% (95% CI, 0.26-0.33) for February to March 2020; 20.3% (95% CI, 0.17-0.23) for April to June 2020; 12.5% (95% CI, 0.06-22.90) for July to September 2020; 17.2% (95% CI, 0.15-0.21) for October to December 2020; and 14.5% (95% CI, 0.09-0.21) for January to February 2021 (all P < .001) across the predefined phases. Compared with the second major outbreak, patients diagnosed in the first outbreak were more likely to be 65 years or older (974 of 1626 [60.3%] vs 564 of 1008 [56.1%]; P = .03), have at least 2 comorbidities (793 of 1626 [48.8%] vs 427 of 1008 [42.4%]; P = .001), and have advanced tumors (708 of 1626 [46.4%] vs 536 of 1008 [56.1%]; P < .001). Complications of COVID-19 were more likely to be seen (738 of 1626 [45.4%] vs 342 of 1008 [33.9%]; P < .001) and require hospitalization (969 of 1626 [59.8%] vs 418 of 1008 [42.1%]; P < .001) and anti–COVID-19 therapy (1004 of 1626 [61.7%] vs 501 of 1008 [49.7%]; P < .001) during the first major outbreak. The 14-day CFRs for the first and second major outbreaks were 25.6% (95% CI, 0.23-0.28) vs 16.2% (95% CI, 0.13-0.19; P < .001), respectively. After adjusting for country, sex, age, comorbidities, tumor stage and status, anti–COVID-19 and anticancer therapy, and COVID-19 complications, patients diagnosed in the first outbreak had an increased risk of death at 14 days (hazard ratio [HR], 1.85; 95% CI, 1.47-2.32) and 3 months (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.08-1.51) compared with those diagnosed in the second outbreak. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The findings of this registry-based study suggest that mortality in patients with cancer diagnosed with COVID-19 has improved in Europe; this improvement may be associated with earlier diagnosis, improved management, and dynamic changes in community transmission over time