24 research outputs found

    One size doesn’t fit all: gender differences in motivations for becoming an entrepreneur

    No full text
    Why are people motivated to become entrepreneurs? Previous studies suggest independence, money, a challenge or to get recognition, and work and family reasons are key motivators. Understanding more about potential gender differences in the motivations to become an entrepreneur is the focus of this thesis. In addition to contributing to the academic literature, this study also has implications for policy makers and practitioners, as well as for entrepreneurs and nascent entrepreneurs. It is often concluded that women’s and men’s motivations for becoming an entrepreneur are similar. While there have been many studies on the motivations for becoming an entrepreneur, empirical studies that compare women and men directly are more limited. Much of this prior research has focused on testing whether gender differences exist, and gives little attention to theory development. An integrated perspective, proposed by Brush (1992) suggests that women integrate their business into their lives. This integrated perspective encompasses psychological and sociological foundations and is used a framework for exploring gender differences in motivations for becoming an entrepreneur. This study employs a multiple paradigm research methodology. The first paradigm mirrors much of the prior literature. A mail survey was designed, and responses were received from 289 entrepreneurs. No statistically significant gender differences were found on any of the six motivating factors tested. The second paradigm involved a constructivist approach to explore two motivations in particular (work and family). In depth, face-to-face, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 50 of these entrepreneurs (25 women and 25 men). The findings suggest that women and men construct the term ‘entrepreneur’ differently, and few women participants are willing to apply the term entrepreneur to themselves. The findings also support the integrated perspective, where women consider their families (especially children and domestic partners) in their decision to become an entrepreneur, whereas men appear to be motivated by a desire to outdo their fathers or prove something to their families. Men are motivated to become an entrepreneur because of dissatisfaction with their jobs, and a desire for independence from an employer. Alternatively, few women had such dissatisfaction at work. The prime objective of this thesis is to contribute to theory development. Two models are proposed to explain gender differences in motivations to become an entrepreneur. They offer contributions to theory by suggesting that women entrepreneurs construe themselves as interdependent, and this impacts their motivations to become an entrepreneur. Alternatively, men participants tend to be motivated by internal factors, and this suggests that they have a more independent construal of self.UnpublishedAaltio, I., & Mills, A. J. (2002). Organizational culture and gendered identities in context. In A. J. Mills (Ed.), Gender, identity and the culture of organizations. London: Routledge. Acker, J. (1992). Gendering organizational theory. In P. Tancred (Ed.), Gendering organizational analysis. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, In. Acker, J., & Van Houten, D. R. (1992). Differential recruitment and control: The sex structuring of organizations. In P. Tancred (Ed.), Gendering organizational analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Ahl, H. J. (2002). The construction of the female entrepreneur as the Other. In H. Hopfl (Ed.), Casting the other: The production and maintenance of inequalities in work organizations. London: Routledge. Ahl, H. J. (2003). Ways to study the text of entrepreneurship. Paper presented at the Scandinavian Academy of Management, Reykjavik, Iceland. Alcorso, C. (1993). "And I'd like to thank my wife..." Gender dynamics and the ethnic "family business". Australian Feminist Studies, 17(Autumn), 93-108. Aldrich, H. (1989). Networking among women entrepreneurs. In D. L. Sexton (Ed.), Women-owned businesses. New York: Praeger. Aldrich, H. E., & Cliff, J. E. (2003). The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of business venturing, 18(5), 573-396. Allen, S., & Truman, C. (1992). Women, business and self-employment: a conceptual minefield. In N. Gilbert (Ed.), Women and working lives: divisional and change. New York: St Martin's Press. Altheide, D. L., & Johnson, J. M. (1994). Criteria for assessing interpretive validity in qualitative research. In Y. S. Lincoln (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Alvesson, M. (1998). Gender relations and identity at work: A case study of masculinities and femininities in an advertising agency. Human Relations, 51(8), 969-1006. Alvesson, M., & Billing, Y. D. (1992). Gender and organization: towards a differentiated understanding. Organization Studies, 13(1), 73-103. Alvesson, M., & Billing, Y. D. (1997). Understanding gender and organizations. London: Sage Publications Ltd. Alvesson, M., & Billing, Y. D. (2002). Beyond body-counting: a discussion of the social construction of gender at work. In A. J. Mills (Ed.), Gender, identity and the culture of organizations. London: Routledge. Arthur, M. B., & Rousseau, D. M. (1996). The boundaryless career as a new employment principle. In D. M. Rousseau (Ed.), The boundaryless career: a new employment principle for a new organizational era (pp. 3-19). New York: Oxford University Press. Aslesen, S. (1998). Does gender make a difference in entrepreneurship? , Universitetet i Oslo, Oslo. Atkinson, J. (1964). An introduction to motivation. Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc. Bacharach, S. B. (1989). Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 496-515. Baines, S., & Wheelock, J. (1998). Working for each other: Gender, the household and micro-business survival and growth. International Small Business Journal, 17(1), 16-35. Baker, T., Aldrich, H. E., & Liou, N. (1997). Invisible entrepreneurs: the neglect of women business owners by mass media and scholarly journals in the USA. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 9, 221-238. Barrett, M. (1995). Feminist perspectives on learning for entrepreneurship: the view from small business, Frontiers of entrepreneurship research (1995 Edition ed.): Babson College. Barretto, H. (1989). The entrepreneur in microeconomic theory: Disappearance and explanation. London: Routledge. Bar-Tal, D., & Hanson-Frieze, I. (1977). Achievement motivation for males and females as a determinant of attributions for success and failure. ?, ?(?). Baumol, W. J. (1986). Entrepreneurship and a century of growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 1, 141-145. Baumol, W. J. (1990). Entrepreneurship: productive, unproductive, and destructive. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5. pt 1), 893-921. Belcourt, M. (1987a). Nothing to lose: entrepreneurial behaviour of female entrepreneurs. Canadian Journal of Administration Sciences, 4(2), 199-210. Belcourt, M. (1987b). Sociological factors associated with female entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 4(3), 22-31. Belcourt, M. (1988). The family incubator model of female entrepreneurship. Journal of small business and entrepreneurship, 5(3), 34-44. Belcourt, M. (1990). A family portrait of Canada's most successful female entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Ethics, 9, 435-438. Belcourt, M. (1991). From the frying pan into the fire: Exploring entrepreneurship as a solution to the glass ceiling. Journal of small business and entrepreneurship, 8(3), 49-55. Belcourt, M., Burke, R. J., & Lee-Gosselin, H. (1991). The glass box: Women business owners in Canada. Ontario: Canadian Advisory council on the status of women. Bell, E. L., & Nkomo, S. M. (1992). Re-visioning women manager's lives. In P. Tancred (Ed.), Gendering organizational analysis. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, Inc. Bellu, R. R., Davidsson, P., & Goldfarb, C. (1989). Motivational characteristics of small firm entrepreneurs in Israel, Italy and Sweden: A cross cultural study. Paper presented at the International Council for Small Business. Bellu, R. R., & Sherman, H. (1995). Predicting firm success from task motivation and attributional style: a longitudinal study. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 7, 349-363. Benny, M., & Hughes, E. C. (1970). Of sociology and the interview. In N. K. Denzin (Ed.), Sociological Methods: A sourcebook. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company. Berg, B. L. (2001). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality. London: Allen Lane The penguin press. Billing, Y. D., & Alvesson, M. (1994). Gender, managers, and organizations. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Bird, B. (1993). Demographic approaches to entrepreneurship: the role of experience and background. In R. H. Brockhaus (Ed.), Advances in Entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth: JAI Press Inc. Birley, S. (1989). Female entrepreneurs: Are they really any different? Journal of Small Business Management(January), 32-37. Blizzard, D. (1996). Promoting entrepreneurship as a career option and providing business start-up support for students and graduates - experiences of graduate enterprises. International Small Business Journal, 14(3), 104-106. Bogenhold, D., & Staber, U. (1991). The decline and rise of self-employment. Work, Employment and Society, 5(2), 223-239. Bolton, J. E. (1971). Small firms: Report of the committee of inquiry on small firms. London: Her Majesty's stationery office. Borooah, V. K., Collins, G., Hart, M., & MacNabb, A. (1997). Women in business. In C. Mason (Ed.), Small firms: Entrepreneurship in the nineties. London: Paul Chapman Publishing (on behalf of the Institute for Small business affairs). Bourdieu, P. (2001). Masculine domination (Translated ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press, in association with Blackwell Publishers Ltd. Bowen, D. D., & Hisrich, R. D. (1986). The female entrepreneur: a career development perspective. Academy of Management Review, 11(2), 393-407. Breen, J., Calvert, C., & Oliver, J. (1995). Female entrepreneurs in Australia: An investigation of financial and family issues. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 3(4), 445-461. Brewer, J., & Hunter, A. (1989). Multimethod research: A synthesis of styles. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Brock, W. A., & Evans, D. S. (1989). Small business economics. Small Business Economics, 1, 7-20. Brockhaus, R. H., Snr. (1987). Entrepreneurial folklore. Journal of Small Business Management, 1-6. Brockhaus, R. H., Snr. (1988). Entrepreneurial research: Are we playing the correct game? American Journal of Small Business, 12(3), 55-61. Brovernan, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. (1975). Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal. In L. W. Hoffman (Ed.), Women and Achievement. Washington: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation. Bruce, R. (1976). The entrepreneurs strategies, motivations, successes and failures. Bedford: Libertarian Books Limited. Brush, C. G. (1990). Women and enterprise creation. In OECD (Ed.), Enterprising Women: local initiatives for job creation (pp. 1-100). Paris: OECD. Brush, C. G. (1992). Research on women business owners: Past trends, a new perspective and future directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(4), 5-30. Brush, C. G. (1998). A resource perspective on women's entrepreneurship: Research, relevance and recognition. In OECD (Ed.), Women Entrepreneurs in Small and Medium Enterprises. Paris: OECD. Brush, C. G., & Vanderwerf, P. A. (1992). A comparison of methods and sources for obtaining estimates of new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 7, 157-170. Bruyat, C., & Julien, P.-A. (2000). Defining the field of research in entrepreneurship. Journal of business venturing, 16, 165-180. Bryman, A. (1989). Research methods and organization studies (Vol. 20). London: Unwin Hyman. Buckley, P. J., & Chapman, M. (1997). The use of native categories in management research. British Journal of Management, 8(4), 283-300. Burke, R., & Belcourt, M. (1989). Work and family in the lives of female entrepreneurs: Having it all? (Working Paper). Western Ontario: School of Business Administration, The University of Western Ontario. Burke, R. J., & McKeen, C. A. (1988). Work and family: what we know and what we need to know. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 5, 30-40. Burn, S. M., Aboud, R., & Moyles, C. (2000). The relationship between gender social identity and support for feminism. Sex Roles, 42(11/12), 1081-1090. Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis: Elements of the sociology of corporate life. Aldershot: Heinemann Educational Books. Buttner, E. H. (1993). Female entrepreneurs: How far have they come? Business Horizons(March/April), 59-65. Buttner, E. H., & Moore, D. P. (1997). Women's organizational exodus to entrepreneurship: self-reported motivations and correlates with success. Journal of Small Business Management, 35(1), 34-46. Buttner, E. H., & Rosen, B. (1988). Bank loan officers' perceptions of the characteristics of men, women, and successful entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 3, 249-258. Buttner, E. H., & Rosen, B. (1992). Rejection in the loan application process: male and female entrepreneurs' perceptions and subsequent intentions. Journal of Small Business Management, 30(1), 58-65. Bygrave, W. D. (1989a). The entrepreneurship paradigm (I): A philosophical look at its research methodologies. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 14(1), 7-24. Bygrave, W. D. (1989b). The entrepreneurship paradigm (II): Chaos and catastrophes among quantum jumps? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 14(2), 7-30. Bygrave, W. D., & Hofer, C. W. (1991). Theorizing about entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(2), 13-22. Calas, M. B., & Smircich, L. (1992a). Re-writing gender into organizational theorizing: Directions from feminist perspectives. In M. Hughes (Ed.), Rethinking organization: New directions in organisation theory and analysis. London: Sage Publications Limited. Calas, M. B., & Smircich, L. (1992b). Using the "F" word: Feminist theories and the social consequences of organizational research. In P. Tancred (Ed.), Gendering organizational analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Cameron, A., & Massey, C. (1999). Small and medium-sized enterprises: A New Zealand perspective. Auckland: Addison Wesley Longman New Zealand Limited. Campbell, C. A. (1992). A decision theory model for entrepreneurial acts. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 17(1), 21-27. Campbell, R., & Wasco, S. M. (2000). Feminist approaches to social science: Epistemological and methodological tenets. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28(6), 773-791. Campbell-Hunt, C. (2001). "Bugger the boxing: Keep pouring the concrete". Exploring the foundations of New Zealand's new economy. Wellington: Changing Gear/Social Dividend Conference. Cantillon, R. (1964). Essai sur la nature du commerce en general (H. Higgs, Trans.). In H. Higgs (Ed.), Essai sur la nature du commerce en general. New York: Augustus M. Kelley, Bookseller. Caputo, R. K., & Dolinsky, A. (1998). Women's choice to pursue self-employment: the role of financial and human capital of household members. Journal of Small Business Management(July), 8-17. Carland, J. W., Hoy, F., Boulton, W. R., & Carland, J. A. C. (1984). Differentiating entrepreneurs from small business owners: A conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 354-359. Carland, J. W., Hoy, F., & Carland, J. A. C. (1988). "Who is an entrepreneur?" is a question worth asking. American Journal of Small Business, 12(4), 33-39. Carson, D., Gilmore, A., Perry, C., & Gronhaug, K. (2001). Qualitative marketing research. London: Sage Publications Ltd. Carsrud, A. L., Olm, K. W., & Thomas, J. B. (1989). Predicting entrepreneurial success: effects of multi-dimensional achievement motivation, levels of ownership, and cooperative relationships. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 1, 237-244. Carter, N. M., & Kolvereid, L. (1998). Women Starting new businesses: the experience in Norway and the United States. In OECD (Ed.), Women Entrepreneurs in Small and Medium Enterprises. Paris: OECD. Carter, S. (1989). The dynamics and performance of female-owned entrepreneurial firms in London, Glasgow and Nottingham. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 2(3), 54-64. Carter, S. (1993). Female business ownership. Current research and possibilities for the future. In C. Truman (Ed.), Women in Business: perspectives on women entrepreneurs. London: Routledge. Carter, S., & Anderson, S. (2001). On the move: Women and men business owners in the United Kingdom. Washington: National Foundation for Women Business Owners. Carter, S., & Cannon, T. (1988). Female entrepreneurs: a study of female business owners; their motivations, experiences and strategies for success (Research paper no 65). Stirling: Department of Employment. Carter, S., & Cannon, T. (1992). Women as entrepreneurs: A study of female business owners, their motivations, experiences and strategies for success. London: Academic Press. Casson, M. (1990a). Enterprise and competitiveness: A systems view of international business. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Casson, M. (1993). Entrepreneurship and business culture. In M. B. Rose (Ed.), Entrepreneurship, networks and modern business. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Casson, M. (1999). Entrepreneurship and the theory of the firm. In C. Karlsson (Ed.), Entrepreneuership, small and medium-sized enterprises and the macroeconomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Casson, M. (Ed.). (1990b). Entrepreneurship. Aldershot, Hants: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. Catley, S., & Hamilton, R. T. (1998). Small business development and gender of owner. The Journal of Management Development, 17(1), 75-80. Cavana, R. Y., Delahaye, B. L., & Sekaran, U. (2001). Applied business research: Qualitative and quantitative methods. Milton, Qld: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. Cerulo, K. A. (1997). Identity construction: New issues, new directions. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 385-410. Chandler, G. N., & Lyon, D. W. (2001). Issues of research design and construct measurement in entrepreneurship research: The past decade. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 25(4), 101-113. Charbeneau, F. J. (1981). The woman entrepreneur. American Demographics, 3(6), 21-23. Chell, E., & Haworth, J. M. (1988). Entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial management: the need for a paradigm. Graduate Management Research, 4(1), 16-33. Chetty, S., & Campbell-Hunt, C. (2003). Paths to internationalisation amongst small-to-medium firms: A global versus regional approach. International Small Business Journal, 21(1), 5-28. Churchill, N. C., & Lewis, V. L. (1986). Entrepreneurship research: Directions and methods. In R. W. Smilor (Ed.), The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Ballinger Publishing Company. Cliff, J. E. (1998). Does one size fit all? exploring the relationship between attitudes towards growth, gender, and business size. Journal of Business Venturing, 13, 523-542. Coleman, S. (1998). Access to capital: a comparison of men and women-owned small businesses. Paper presented at the Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, ? Collom, D. (1982). Canadian women owner/managers (Working Paper). Ottawa: Small Business Secretariat, Policy Research and Formulation Unit. Corbett, L. M., & Campbell-Hunt, C. (2002). Grapping with a gusher! Manufacturing's response to business success in small and medium enterprises. Journal of Operations Management, 20(5), 495-. Corman, J., Perles, B., & Vancini, P. (1988). Motivational factors influencing high-technology entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management, 36-42. Cromie, S. (1987a). Motivations of aspiring male and female entrepreneurs. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 8, 251-261. Cromie, S. (1987b). Similarities and differences between women and men who choose business proprietorship. International Small Business Journal, 5(3), 43-60. Cromie, S., & Birley, S. (1992). Networking by female business owners in Northern Ireland. Journal of Business Venturing, 7, 237-251. Cromie, S., & Hayes, J. (1988). Towards a typology of female entrepreneurs. Sociological Review, 36(1), 87-113. Crouter, A. C. (1984). Spillover from family to work: the neglected side of the work-family interface. Human Relations, 37(6), 425-442. Cunningham, J. B., & Lischeron, J. (1991). Defining entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management, 29(1), 45-61. Curran, J., & Blackburn, R. A. (2001). Researching the small enterprise. London: Sage Publications Ltd. de Beauvior, S. (2000). The second sex (H. M. Parshley, Trans.). London: David Campbell Publishers. Delmar, R. (1986). What is feminism? In A. Oakley (Ed.), What is feminism? Oxford: Basil Blackwell. DeMartino, R., & Barbato, R. (2003). Differences between women and men MBA entrepreneurs: Exploring family flexibility and wealth creation as career motivators. Journal of business venturing, 18(6), 815-832. Deng, S., Hassan, L., & Jivan, S. (1995). Female entrepreneurs doing business in Asia: A special investigation. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise(12), 60-80. Dennis, W. J. (2003). Raising response rates in mail surveys of small business owners: Results of an experiment. Journal of Small Business Management, 41(3), 278-295. Denzin, N. K. (Ed.). (1970). Sociological methods: A sourcebook. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.

    To grow or not? Growing small service firms

    No full text

    How women and men business owners perceive success

    No full text

    Beyond business: one local government helping business owners with succession planning

    No full text
    Business succession (the transition of ownership and management from one owner/manager to another) is an issue of growing importance to the business community internationally. The paper outlines the activities of the Dunedin City Council’s Economic Development Unit to get local business owners to plan for their business exit - the Beyond Business programme. It documents the consultation process undertaken, describes findings of focus groups with local business advisors and a large survey of local business owners. These processes culminated in the employment of an independent succession planning advisor to help local business owners ‘Beyond Business’. Analysis of one year’s client’s progress is presented. Indications are that this advice, now in its third year of being offered, is raising awareness among business owners of the need to plan for succession

    Business models for model businesses: Lessons from renewable energy entrepreneurs in developing countries

    No full text
    Against the background of mounting research suggesting entrepreneurship as a means of increasing the uptake of renewable energy technologies (RETs) in developing countries, this paper presents the findings of an exploratory investigation into the business models used by renewable energy entrepreneurs in such countries. Forty-three entrepreneurs were interviewed in 28 developing countries and secondary information about country and regional conditions was analysed. We chose the Business Model Canvas as an analytical tool and the findings shed new light on established renewable energy business types. Three different types of businesses were identified – Consultants, Distributors, and Integrators; yet, there is also some overlap between these types. These business types appeared to parallel the life cycle progression of the business, but this requires further research. A key component of the study was to assess whether the types of businesses were related to country-level conditions to assess the impact of regional differences. These comparisons revealed consistencies between country-level characteristics and the entrepreneurs’ choice of business model. Conclusions suggest that different regions may support certain business models more than others due to differing levels of government interest in renewables, governance and policy support and the relative ease of doing business
    corecore