8 research outputs found

    Rotational Stability of Scaphoid Osteosyntheses: An In Vitro Comparison of Small Fragment Cannulated Screws to Novel Bone Screw Sets

    No full text
    <div><p>Background</p><p>The current standard of care for operative repair of scaphoid fractures involves reduction and internal fixation with a single headless compression screw. However, a compression screw in isolation does not necessarily control rotational stability at a fracture or nonunion site. The single screw provides rotational control through friction and bone interdigitation from compression at the fracture site. We hypothesize that osteosyntheses with novel bone screw sets (BSS) equipped with anti-rotational elements provide improved rotational stability.</p><p>Methods</p><p>Stability of osteosynthesis under increasing cyclic torsional loading was investigated on osteotomized cadaveric scaphoids. Two novel prototype BSS, oblique type (BSS-obl.) and longitudinal type (BSS-long.) were compared to three conventional screws: Acutrak2<sup>®</sup>mini, HCS<sup>®</sup>3.0 and Twinfix<sup>®</sup>. Biomechanical tests were performed on scaphoids from single donors in paired comparison and analyzed by balanced incomplete random block design. Loading was increased by 50 mNm increments with 1,000 cycles per torque level and repeated until a rotational clearance of 10°. Primary outcome measure was the number of cycles to 10° clearance, secondary outcome measure was the maximum rotational clearance for each torque level.</p><p>Findings</p><p>BSS-obl. performed significantly better than Acutrak2<sup>®</sup>mini and HCS<sup>®</sup> (p = 0.015, p<0.0001). BSS-long. performed significantly better than HCS<sup>®</sup> (p = 0.010). No significant difference in performance between BSS-obl. and BSS-long. (p = 0.361), between BSS obl. and Twinfix<sup>®</sup> (p = 0.50) and BSS long. and Twinfix<sup>®</sup> (p = 0.667) was detected. Within the torque range up to 200 mNm, four of 21 (19%) BSS-long. and four of 21 (19%) BSS-obl. preparations showed early failure. The same loading led to early failure in four (29%) Twinfix<sup>®</sup>, seven (50%) Acutrak2<sup>®</sup>mini and 10 (71%) HCS<sup>®</sup> of 14 screw samples, respectively.</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>For both BSS and to a lesser extent for Twinfix<sup>®</sup> (as dual-component screw), higher rotational stabilities were identified in comparison to single component headless compression screws.</p></div

    a-e. Screw types.

    No full text
    <p>The shown screws were used for the test series: Acutrak<sup>®</sup>2mini (Acumed) (Fig 1a), Twinfix<sup>®</sup> (Stryker) (Fig 1b), HCS<sup>®</sup> 3.0 (Synthes) (Fig 1c), and prototypes of the two new BSS sets with an additional crosswise drill hole with an inner thread in oblique type (BSS-obl.) (Fig 1d) and with a longitudinal groove with an inner thread and longitudinal screw as a longitudinal type (BSS-long.) (Fig 1e).</p

    a-d. Sample of a force/angle diagram.

    No full text
    <p>Force/angle diagrams of the cyclic load of a scaphoid bone with a torque load from 150 to 300 mNm and resulting loss of stability. In Fig 4d loosening of the screw fastening is clearly visible by the curves which run out to the right and the line up to 10°.</p

    Primary outcome.

    No full text
    <p>Observed Cycles until failure by Implant. Median of maximum attained cycles of the respective screw models with average parameter and standard deviation. Box plot of maximum cycles per screw type. Median, 25% and 75% percentiles, the points correspond to the individual results per screw.</p
    corecore