Association of Neutrophil, Platelet, and Lymphocyte Ratios with the Prognosis in Unresectable and Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

A grant from the One-University Open Access Fund at the University of Kansas was used to defray the author's publication fees in this Open Access journal. The Open Access Fund, administered by librarians from the KU, KU Law, and KUMC libraries, is made possible by contributions from the offices of KU Provost, KU Vice Chancellor for Research & Graduate Studies, and KUMC Vice Chancellor for Research. For more information about the Open Access Fund, please see http://library.kumc.edu/authors-fund.xml.We examined the relationship between the daily rate of change of cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) over the first 90 days of treatment (DRC90) and the pretreatment levels of neutrophils, lymphocytes, and platelets with the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with stage IV pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) who received chemotherapy. We retrospectively evaluated 102 locally advanced and metastatic PDA patients treated at the University of Kansas Cancer Center (KUCC) between January 2011 and September 2019. We compared the ratio of the pretreatment absolute neutrophil count to the pretreatment absolute lymphocyte count (NLR) and the ratio between the pretreatment platelet count to the pretreatment absolute lymphocyte count (PLR) with the OS and PFS. We compared the DRC90 to the OS and PFS. The ratios were analyzed using the log-rank trend test using the mean of the NLR, PLR, and DRC90 as the threshold for two groups within each variable. Patients with ≥mean NLR (4.6 K/µL) had a significantly lower OS (p = 0.0444) and PFS (p = 0.0483) compared with patients below the mean. Patients with PLR ≥ mean (3.9 K/µL) did not have a significantly different OS (p = 0.507) or PFS (p = 0.643) compared with patients below the mean. Patients with DRC90 ≥ mean (−1%) did not have a significantly different OS (p = 0.342) or PFS (p = 0.313) compared with patients below the mean. Patients with NLR ≥ mean (4.6 K/µL) had a significantly lower OS and PFS compared with patients with NLR below the mean. This implies the possibility of NLR as a prognostic marker in PDA that could guide treatment approaches but still requires validation in a larger cohort

Similar response rates and survival with PARP inhibitors for patients with solid tumors harboring somatic versus Germline BRCA mutations: a Meta-analysis and systematic review

A grant from the One-University Open Access Fund at the University of Kansas was used to defray the author's publication fees in this Open Access journal. The Open Access Fund, administered by librarians from the KU, KU Law, and KUMC libraries, is made possible by contributions from the offices of KU Provost, KU Vice Chancellor for Research & Graduate Studies, and KUMC Vice Chancellor for Research. For more information about the Open Access Fund, please see http://library.kumc.edu/authors-fund.xml.Background PARP inhibitors (PARPi) have recently been approved for various malignancies based on the results of several clinical trials. However, these trials have mostly recruited patients with germline BRCA mutations, and it is unclear whether PARPi have similar efficacy in patients with somatic BRCA mutations. Our study aimed to determine the efficacy of PARPi in patients with somatic BRCA mutations. Methods We performed a meta-analysis comparing overall response rate to PARPi in patients harboring somatic versus germline BRCA mutations. We looked at studies including somatic and germline mutations in BRCA patients that received PARPi. Results After screening and removing duplicates, 18 studies met our criteria for including both somatic and germline BRCA mutations. Only 8 studies reported response rates for both somatic and germline BRCA mutations. In those studies, 24 out of 43 patients with somatic BRCA mutations (55.8%), and 69 out of 157 (43.9%) patients with germline BRCA patients had a response to therapy to PARPi. This difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.399). In all five studies that reported progression-free survival, there was no obvious difference in outcomes between somatic versus germline BRCA patients, however a precise statistical analysis could not be performed. Conclusion Our meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature indicates similar response rates of PARPi therapy in patients with somatic and germline BRCA mutations. Investigation of use of PARPi therapy in a broader patient population, and the inclusion of somatic BRCA mutations in further clinical trials is paramount in improving therapeutic options for our patients

Clinical Outcome of Ampullary Carcinoma: Single Cancer Center Experience

A grant from the One-University Open Access Fund at the University of Kansas was used to defray the author's publication fees in this Open Access journal. The Open Access Fund, administered by librarians from the KU, KU Law, and KUMC libraries, is made possible by contributions from the offices of KU Provost, KU Vice Chancellor for Research & Graduate Studies, and KUMC Vice Chancellor for Research. For more information about the Open Access Fund, please see http://library.kumc.edu/authors-fund.xml.Ampullary cancers represent a subset of periampullary cancers, comprising only 0.2% all gastrointestinal cancers. Localized disease is primarily managed by a surgical intervention, called pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), followed in many cases by the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) or chemoradiation therapy (CRT). However, there are no clear evidence-based guidelines to aid in selecting both the modality and regimen of adjuvant therapy for resected Ampullary carcinoma. Methods. We retrospectively analyzed 54 patients at KU Cancer Center, who had undergone endoscopic resection or pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for Ampullary cancer from June 2006 to July 2016. We obtained patients’ baseline characteristics, clinical presentation, pathology, treatment modality, recurrence pattern, and survival outcomes. The time-to-events data were compared using Kaplan-Meier methods. A univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression was performed to evaluate factors associated with overall survival (OS) and generate hazard ratios (HR). Results. The mean age of the 54 patients was 68 (37-90). 38 (70%) were males and 16 (30%) were females. Most of the patients were Caucasian (76%). Approximately half of all patients had a history of smoking, 20% had alcohol abuse, and 13% had pancreatitis. Among the 54 patients with localized cancers, 9 (16%) were treated definitively with nonoperative therapies, usually due to a prohibitive comorbidity profile, performance status, or unresectable tumor. 45 out of 54 patients (83%) underwent surgery. Of the 45 patients who underwent surgery, 18 patients (40% of the study cohort) received adjuvant therapy due to concerns for advanced disease as determined by the treating physician. 13 patients (24%) received adjuvant CT and 5 patients (9.2%) received CRT. The remaining 27 patients (50%) underwent surgery alone. The median OS for the entire study cohort was 30 months. When compared to surgery alone, adjuvant therapy with either CT or CRT had no statistically significant difference in terms of progression-free survival (p=0.56) or overall survival (p=0.80). In univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, high-risk features like peripancreatic extension (16%) and perineural invasion (26%) were found to be associated with poor OS. Lymph node metastasis (29%) did not significantly affect OS (HR 1.42, 95% CI 0.73-1.86; p=0.84). Lymphovascular invasion (29%) was not associated with poor OS (HR 1.22, 95% CI 0.52, 2.96; p=0.76). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, only age group>70 years was significantly associated with OS , while other factors, including the receipt of adjuvant therapy, lymph nodes, positive margin, and lymphovascular, perineural, and peripancreatic involvement, were not significantly associated with OS. These results are likely due to small sample size. Conclusions. Despite numerous advances in both cancer care and research, efforts in rare malignancies such as Ampullary cancer remain very challenging with a clear lack of an evidence-based standard of care treatment paradigm. Although adding adjuvant therapies such as chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy is likely to improve survival in high-risk disease, there is no standardized regimen for the treatment of Ampullary cancer. More research is required to elucidate whether statistically and clinically relevant differences exist that may warrant a change in the current adjuvant treatment strategies

Real world outcomes in patients with neuroendocrine tumor receiving peptide receptor radionucleotide therapy

Aim: 177Lu-Dotatate (Lu-177), a form of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), was approved by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of somatostatin-receptor-positive neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) in 2018. Clinical trials prior to the FDA approval of Lu-177 showed favorable outcomes but there is limited published real world outcomes data. This study aims to describe and analyze real world outcomes of patients with NET who received Lu-177. Methods: After obtaining institutional review board approval, retrospective evaluation was performed to analyze the efficacy of Lu-177 for somatostatin receptor-positive gastro-entero-pancreatic NETs (GEP-NETs) patients at the University of Kansas Cancer Center between June 2018 and September 2021. This study aims to determine the response rate to the treatment of the entire cohort and subgroups. Results: A total of 65 patients received Lu-177 of which 58 completed treatment. The 58 patients had a median age of 61.5 years, 24 females and 34 males, 86% Caucasian and 12% black. The origins of NETs were primarily small bowel (n = 24) and pancreatic (n = 14). Pathology showed grades 1 (n = 21), 2 (n = 25), and 3 (n = 4) and were primarily well-differentiated tumors (n = 4). Among the cohort, 52 patients had imaging to assess response with 14 (26.9%) patients with partial response (PR), 31 (59.6%) with stable disease (SD), and 7 (13.5%) with progressive disease (PD). In a subset analysis, patients with non-functional disease (n = 29) had higher rates of PR 42.3% (compared to 11.5%, P = 0.0147) and higher disease control rate of 96% (compared to 78%, P = 0.042) than patients with functional disease (n = 29). Patients with non-functional disease had a lower PD of 3.85% (compared to 23%, P = 0.0147) than those with functional disease. Conclusions: This real world outcomes analysis of NETs treated with Lu-177 shows improved PR when compared to the initial clinical trials and is promising for patients. In addition, patients with non-functional tumors were found to have a statistically significant improved response rate which has not been described in the literature before. If these study findings are validated in a larger cohort they may guide patient selection for Lu-177 therapy in the future

PD-1 blockade in recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer: Data from cemiplimab phase I expansion cohorts and characterization of PD-L1 expression in cervical cancer

Objectives: To characterize the safety, tolerability, and anti-tumor activity of cemiplimab as monotherapy or in combination with hypofractionated radiation therapy (hfRT) in patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer. To determine the association between histology and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. Methods: In non-randomized phase I expansion cohorts, patients (squamous or non-squamous histology) received cemiplimab 3 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks for 48 weeks, either alone (monotherapy cohort) or with hfRT during week 2 (combination cohort). Due to insufficient tissue material, PD-L1 protein expression was evaluated in commercially purchased samples and mRNA expression levels were analyzed from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Results: Twenty patients enrolled in both cohorts in total; 10 had squamous histology. The most common adverse events of any grade were diarrhea, fatigue, and hypokalemia, occurring in 35%, 25%, and 25%, respectively. Objective response rate was 10% in each cohort; responders had squamous histology. Duration of response was 11.2 months and 6.4 months for the responder in the monotherapy and combination cohort, respectively. Irradiated lesions were not included in the response assessments. In separate archived specimens (N = 155), PD-L1 protein expression in tumor and immune cells was negative (<1%) more commonly in adenocarcinoma than in squamous tumors. PD-L1 mRNA levels were lower in adenocarcinoma than squamous cell tumors (1.2 vs 5.0 mean transcripts per million, respectively) in TCGA. Conclusions: Cemiplimab has activity in cervical squamous cell carcinoma. The phase I results, combined with results from other anti-PD-1 trials in cervical cancer and our biomarker analyses have informed the design of the ongoing phase III trial, with the primary overall survival hierarchical analyses being done first in patients with squamous histology

Capecitabine versus 5-fluorouracil in colorectal cancer: where are we now?

Fluorouracil (5-FU) remains the most widely used agent for colorectal cancer. Capecitabine is a rationally designed 5-FU pro-drug developed to mimic the continuous infusion of 5-FU while avoiding complications and inconvenience of intravenous administration. Capecitabine is absorbed intact from the gastrointestinal tract, converted enzymatically to active 5-FU, and released directly into the tumor. Capecitabine’s efficacy and safety are shown in multiple phase III trials across different disease stages and therapy lines. Three randomized phase III trials demonstrated the equivalence of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) versus 5-FU/leucovorin (LV)/oxaliplatin (FOLFOX). The safety of capecitabine compared with 5-FU depends on the regimen of 5-FU used. The adverse event rate with oxaliplatin in combination with infusional 5-FU is similar to that of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin but is associated with more neutropenia and venous thrombotic events; capecitabine plus oxaliplatinbased regimens tend to be associated with more grade 3 diarrhea and hand-foot skin reaction. Combination therapy with capecitabine and irinotecan (CapeIRI) versus 5-FU/ LV and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) had more variable results; some former schedules resulted in excessive treatmentrelated toxicity. More recent data show that lower capecitabine and irinotecan doses, different schedules, and combination with targeted agents (e.g, bevacizumab) have resulted in more favorable outcomes

Initial results of a first-in-human, dose escalation study of a cell-based vaccine in HLA A*02+ patients (pts) with recurrent, locally advanced or metastatic HPV16+ solid tumors: SQZ-PBMC-HPV-101.

Research Funding: SQZ Biotechnologies Background:Ineffective MHC-I presentation of tumor antigens to CD8+ T cells limits T cell activation and the efficacy of cancer vaccines. The Cell Squeeze technology drives peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) through a microfluidic chip leading to temporary cell membrane disruption and delivery of HPV16 E6 and E7 antigens cytosolically. These antigen presenting cells (APC) were matured with CpG7909 and were not genetically modified. Preclinically, this approach showed improvement in MHC-I presentation for human and murine cells. In murine tumor studies, m-SQZ-PBMC-HPV elicited robust CD8+ T cell responses and improved anti-tumor effects when compared to other vaccine modalities.Methods:SQZ-PBMC-HPV-101 included pts with incurable HPV16+ cancers progressing after unlimited prior therapy, ECOG 0-1, adequate organ function and a biopsiable lesion. After leukapheresis at the study site, manufacturing of the cryopreserved product took \u3c 24 hours with a vein-to-vein time of approx. 1 week. Out-patient SQZ-PBMC-HPV was given IV q 3 weeks without a conditioning regimen. Double antigen priming (DP) was introduced with Cohort 3 and occurred on Cycle 1 Days 1 and 2. Maximum treatment duration for each patient was determined by the cell batch size. Response was assessed via RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST. Investigational biomarkers were measured pre- and post-treatment.Results:12 pts [anal (7), head and neck (3), and cervical (2)] were dosed in 3 cohorts (3 pts in 0.5 x10e6/kg, 5 pts in 2.5 x10e6/kg, and 4 pts in 2.5x 10e6/kg [DP]). Median lines of prior Tx were 4 (range 1 - 7) and all but one pt were pretreated with checkpoint inhibitors (CPI); 10 pts had liver or lung metastases. All batches of SQZ-PBMC-HPV demonstrated CD8 activation in vitro after thawing, and batch size did not limit therapy duration at dose levels tested to date. Median number of doses were 3 (3 - 10), 3 (2 - 4), and 3 (3 – 4) in the 3 cohorts, respectively. One pt (10 doses) remained on study for 42 weeks. Tx was well-tolerated and there were no DLTs, Grade (G) \u3e3 related SAEs or related G \u3e3 AEs. One pt in cohort 1 experienced both a G2 infusion-related reaction and cytokine release syndrome. One pt in cohort 2 was not evaluable for DLT. Four out of 10 evaluable pts had stable disease per RECIST 1.1 as the best response. Preliminary tumor analyses pre- and post-therapy indicated increased immune activity in some patients after SQZ infusion.Conclusions:SQZ-PBMC-HPV-101 demonstrated clinical feasibility of the Cell Squeeze technology and favorable tolerability of engineered APCs. The study allows for the characterization of the immunogenicity of engineered APCs in humans. Preliminary results warrant the testing in combination with CPI. Efficacy, safety, and correlative biomarker data will be presented, from pre- and post-therapy biopsies and blood samples. Clinical trial information: NCT0408495

418 A phase 1, dose escalation and dose expansion study of SQZ PBMC HPV as monotherapy and in combination with atezolizumab in HLA-A*02+ Patients with HPV16+ recurrent, or metastatic solid tumors

Background SQZ-PBMC-HPV is a therapeutic cancer vaccine created with Cell Squeeze®, a proprietary cell-engineering system. SQZ-PBMC-HPV is a novel cancer vaccine generated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) squeezed with HPV16 E6 and E7 antigens, resulting in delivery into the cytosol. The resulting antigen presenting cells (APCs) provide enhanced antigen presentation on MHC-I to potentially elicit robust, antigen-specific CD8+ T cell responses. Importantly, SQZ-PBMC-HPV are neither genetically modified nor immune effector cells.Studies in MHC-I knockout mice demonstrated that activation of antigen specific CD8+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) was a direct effect of cytosolic antigen delivery to PBMCs. In the murine TC-1 tumor model, tumor regression correlated with an influx of HPV16-specific CD8+ TILs. In vitro studies with human volunteer PBMCs demonstrated that each subset is capable of inducing CD8+ T cell responses. The Phase 1 study includes a significant biomarker program to investigate whether pharmacodynamic effects observed in non-clinical studies correlate with potential clinical benefit. Immunogenic and pharmacodynamic endpoints include Elispot assays to measure frequency of interferon gamma secreting cells, as well as quantification and characterization of TILs and tumor microenvironment. In addition, various cytokine responses and circulating cell-free HPV16 DNA levels in plasma are measured. Methods SQZ-PBMC-HPV-101 (NCT04084951) is open for enrollment to HLA A*02+ patients with HPV16+ recurrent, locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors and includes escalation cohorts for monotherapy and in combination with atezolizumab. After initial demonstration of safety, the study assesses dose effect by testing different cell dose levels, the effect of prolonged antigen priming in Cycle 1 [APC administration on Day 1 only compared to Days 1 and 2 (double priming)] and the impact of treatment duration to identify the optimal dose regimen. The cycle length is 3 weeks, and patients will receive SQZ-PBMC-HPV for up to 1 year or until available autologous drug product is exhausted. Atezolizumab will be administered for up to 1 year. Eligible patients including but not limited to anal, cervical and head and neck tumors will undergo a single leukapheresis at the study site. The manufacturing process includes a maturation step and takes less than 24 hours. The vein-to-vein time for the 1st administration is approximately one week. Patients must have a lesion that can be biopsied with acceptable clinical risk and agree to have a fresh biopsy at Screening and on study. A Study Safety Committee is in place. No formal statistical hypothesis testing will be performed. Results N/A Conclusions N/A Trial Registration NCT04084951 Ethics Approval The study is registered on clinicaltrials.gov was approved by the Ethics Board of all institution listed as recruiting. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2020-SITC2020.041