9 research outputs found
Characteristics of age, gender and municipality size of study participants.
<p>Characteristics of age, gender and municipality size of study participants.</p
Prevalence of physical activities and screen-related behaviors among adolescent participants in Gran Canaria Physical Activity Study.
a<p>5 days per week of AFMV +300 minutes per week +1,800 MET per week;</p>b<p>Aerobics, step and similar;</p>c<p>Basketball, handball, volleyball, rugby, field hockey, baseball;</p>d<p>Tennis, badminton, paddle, squash, table tennis;</p>e<p>Surfing, windsurfing, diving, hunting, canoeing, rowing, sailing;</p>f<p>Skateboard, skate;</p>g<p>Judo, karate, taekwondo, fencing, wrestling;</p>h<p>Motocross, trial, motorcycling in track, karts;</p>*<p>p<0.05 for differences between boys and girls.</p
Percentiles of time dedicated to moderate, vigorous and total of physical activities among adolescents participants.
<p>Percentiles of time dedicated to moderate, vigorous and total of physical activities among adolescents participants.</p
Percentiles of time dedicated to television, computer, video-game, portable mini consoles and total of screen-related behaviors among adolescents participants.
<p>Percentiles of time dedicated to television, computer, video-game, portable mini consoles and total of screen-related behaviors among adolescents participants.</p
Odds ratio for being sufficiently active in relation to screen-related behaviors and social environments variables among adolescents participants in Gran Canaria Physical Activity Study.
a<p>For each increase of 1 hour per day;</p>b<p>For each increase of 1 point in scale (0 =  I don’t like it at all, 5 =  I like it a lot);</p><p>*p<0.05.</p
Bone mineral content (BMC) and areal bone mineral density (BMD) of the upper and lower extremities.
<p>Subjects were grouped as CAG short (CAG<sub>S</sub>) if harboring repeat lengths of ≤21 and CAG long (CAG<sub>L</sub>) if harboring repeat lengths of >21. The cutoff point for GGN short (GGN<sub>S</sub>) was GGN repeat polymorphism ≤23, otherwise subjects were included in the GGN long (GGN<sub>L</sub>) group. Four haplotypes combinations were defined as: CAG<sub>L</sub> + GGN<sub>L</sub>, CAG<sub>S</sub> + GGN<sub>S</sub>, CAG<sub>S</sub> + GGN<sub>L</sub>, and CAG<sub>L</sub> + GGN<sub>S</sub>. * P<0.05 compared to CAG<sub>S</sub> + GGN<sub>S</sub>; $ P<0.05 compared to CAG<sub>L</sub> + GGN<sub>L</sub>.</p
Hip bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral areal density (BMD).
<p>Subjects were grouped as CAG short (CAG<sub>s</sub>) if harboring repeat lengths of ≤21 and CAG long (CAG<sub>L</sub>) if harboring repeat lengths of >21. The cutoff point for GGN short (GGN<sub>s</sub>) was GGN repeat polymorphism ≤23, otherwise subjects were included in the GGN long (GGN<sub>L</sub>) group. Four haplotypes combinations were defined as: CAG<sub>L</sub> + GGN<sub>L</sub>, CAG<sub>S</sub> + GGN<sub>S</sub>, CAG<sub>S</sub> + GGN<sub>L</sub>, and CAG<sub>L</sub> + GGN<sub>S</sub>. * P<0.05 compared to CAG<sub>S</sub> + GGN<sub>S</sub>; § P<0.05 compared to CAG<sub>L</sub> + GGN<sub>S</sub>.</p
Body composition, anthropometrics and physical activity in men with CAG<sub>S</sub> and CAG<sub>L</sub> androgen receptor polymorphisms (mean ± standard deviation).
<p>BMC: bone mineral content, BMD: bone mineral density. Individuals were considered as CAG short (CAG<sub>S</sub>) if harboring repeat lengths ≤21 and CAG long (CAG<sub>L</sub>) if harboring repeat lengths of >21.</p
Mean lumbar spine (from L<sub>2</sub>, L<sub>3</sub> and L<sub>4</sub>) bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral areal density (BMD).
<p>Subjects were grouped as CAG short (CAG<sub>S</sub>) if harboring repeat lengths of ≤21 and CAG long (CAG<sub>L</sub>) if harboring repeat lengths of >21. The cutoff point for GGN short (GGN<sub>S</sub>) was GGN repeat polymorphism ≤23, otherwise subjects were included in the GGN long (GGN<sub>L</sub>) group. Four haplotypes combinations were defined as: CAG<sub>L</sub> + GGN<sub>L</sub>, CAG<sub>S</sub> + GGN<sub>S</sub>, CAG<sub>S</sub> + GGN<sub>L</sub>, and CAG<sub>L</sub> + GGN<sub>S</sub>. * P<0.05 compared to CAG<sub>S</sub> + GGN<sub>S</sub>; § P<0.05 compared to CAG<sub>L</sub> + GGN<sub>S</sub></p