MOESM1 of Testing the potential significance of different scion/rootstock genotype combinations on the ecology of old cultivated olive trees in the southeast Mediterranean area

Additional file 1: Figure S1. Box plot comparisons of phenotypic traits in old olive trees of the MLL1/MLL7 (GG1) and MLL1/MLL1 (GG2) scion/sucker combinations. Traits included the oil content in the fruits, waste water content obtained in the oil extraction process, four oil quality characteristics and three morphological properties of the fruits and stones

Additional file 4: Figure S1. of Genetic variation of naturally growing olive trees in Israel: from abandoned groves to feral and wild?

Number of private alleles per locus in combinations of populations. A to D present values for the combination of two to five populations (treating scions and suckers of old olive trees as populations). (PDF 217 kb

Additional file 3: Table S3. of Genetic variation of naturally growing olive trees in Israel: from abandoned groves to feral and wild?

Number of olive trees assigned to different multi-locus lineages (MLLs). (XLSX 18 kb

Additional file 6: Figure S3. of Genetic variation of naturally growing olive trees in Israel: from abandoned groves to feral and wild?

Location of populations of naturally growing olives analyzed in this study and of groves of cultivated old olive trees sampled in our previous study (Barazani et al. [33]). (PDF 79 kb

Additional file 5: Figure S2. of Genetic variation of naturally growing olive trees in Israel: from abandoned groves to feral and wild?

∆K values for the different Ks were calculated according to Evanno et al. [56], showing that K = 3 is the optimal K for the Structure analysis. (PDF 69 kb

Additional file 1: Table S1. of Genetic variation of naturally growing olive trees in Israel: from abandoned groves to feral and wild?

SSR markers used, their expected size range, repeated motives and number of alleles found in naturally growing olive populations. Raw microsatellite data is available and enclosed as Additional file 2: Table S2. (PDF 188 kb