3 research outputs found

    Detailed Kinetics and Mechanism of the Oxidation of Thiocyanate Ion (SCN<sup>–</sup>) by Peroxomonosulfate Ion (HSO<sub>5</sub><sup>–</sup>). Formation and Subsequent Oxidation of Hypothiocyanite Ion (OSCN<sup>–</sup>)

    No full text
    The haloperoxidase-catalyzed in vivo oxidation of thiocyanate ion (SCN<sup>–</sup>) by H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> is important for generation of the antimicrobial hypothiocyanite ion (OSCN<sup>–</sup>), which is also susceptible to oxidation by strong in vivo oxidizing agents (i.e., H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, OCl<sup>–</sup>, OBr<sup>–</sup>). We report a detailed mechanistic investigation on the multistep oxidation of excess SCN<sup>–</sup> with peroxomonosulfate ion (HSO<sub>5</sub><sup>–</sup> in the form of Oxone) in the range from pH 6.5 to 13.5. OSCN<sup>–</sup> was detected to be the intermediate of this reaction under the above conditions, and a kinetic model is proposed. Furthermore, by kinetic separation of the consecutive reaction steps, the rate constant of the direct oxidation of OSCN<sup>–</sup> by HSO<sub>5</sub><sup>–</sup> was determined: <i>k</i><sub>2</sub> = (1.6 ± 0.1) × 10<sup>2</sup> M<sup>–1</sup> s<sup>–1</sup> at pH 13.5 and <i>k</i><sub>2</sub><sup>H</sup> = (3.3 ± 0.1) × 10<sup>3</sup> M<sup>–1</sup> s<sup>–1</sup> at pH 6.89. A critical evaluation of the estimated activation parameters of the elementary steps revealed that the oxidations of SCN<sup>–</sup> as well as the consecutive OSCN<sup>–</sup> by HSO<sub>5</sub><sup>–</sup> are more likely to proceed via 2e<sup>–</sup>-transfer steps rather than 1e<sup>–</sup> transfer

    Mechanism of Decomposition of the Human Defense Factor Hypothiocyanite Near Physiological pH

    No full text
    Relatively little is known about the reaction chemistry of the human defense factor hypothiocyanite (OSCN<sup>–</sup>) and its conjugate acid hypothiocyanous acid (HOSCN), in part because of their instability in aqueous solutions. Herein we report that HOSCN/OSCN<sup>–</sup> can engage in a cascade of pH- and concentration-dependent comproportionation, disproportionation, and hydrolysis reactions that control its stability in water. On the basis of reaction kinetic, spectroscopic, and chromatographic methods, a detailed mechanism is proposed for the decomposition of HOSCN/OSCN<sup>–</sup> in the range of pH 4–7 to eventually give simple inorganic anions including CN<sup>–</sup>, OCN<sup>–</sup>, SCN<sup>–</sup>, SO<sub>3</sub><sup>2–</sup>, and SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2–</sup>. Thiocyanogen ((SCN)<sub>2</sub>) is proposed to be a key intermediate in the hydrolysis; and the facile reaction of (SCN)<sub>2</sub> with OSCN<sup>–</sup> to give NCS(O)SCN, a previously unknown reactive sulfur species, has been independently investigated. The mechanism of the aqueous decomposition of (SCN)<sub>2</sub> around pH 4 is also reported. The resulting mechanistic models for the decomposition of HOSCN and (SCN)<sub>2</sub> address previous empirical observations, including the facts that the presence of SCN<sup>–</sup> and/or (SCN)<sub>2</sub> decreases the stability of HOSCN/OSCN<sup>–</sup>, that radioisotopic labeling provided evidence that under physiological conditions decomposing OSCN<sup>–</sup> is not in equilibrium with (SCN)<sub>2</sub> and SCN<sup>–</sup>, and that the hydrolysis of (SCN)<sub>2</sub> near neutral pH does not produce OSCN<sup>–</sup>. Accordingly, we demonstrate that, during the human peroxidase-catalyzed oxidation of SCN<sup>–</sup>, (SCN)<sub>2</sub> cannot be the precursor of the OSCN<sup>–</sup> that is produced

    Kinetics of Formation of the Host–Guest Complex of a Viologen with Cucurbit[7]uril

    No full text
    Host–guest complexation between the dicationic viologen 1-tri(ethylene glycol)-1′-methyl-<i>m</i>-xylyl-4,4′-bipyridinium and cucurbit[7]uril (<b>CB7</b>) was studied at pH = 4.5 in water. The stability constants of the mono- and bis-<b>CB7</b> adducts were determined at 25 °C by UV–vis spectroscopy. Stopped-flow kinetic experiments were performed to measure the formation and dissociation rate constants of the monoadduct: <i>k</i><sub>1</sub> = (6.01 ± 0.03) × 10<sup>6</sup> M<sup>–1 </sup>s<sup>–1</sup> and <i>k</i><sub>–1</sub> = 52.7 ± 0.4 s<sup>–1</sup>, respectively. Possible mechanisms of complexation are discussed in view of the kinetic results
    corecore