St. Roch – Patron Saint of Drniš

Povijest štovanja Sv. Roka u Drnišu seže u XVIII. st. Utemeljenjem istoimene crkvice-kapelice (1731. g.) može se kazati da je utemeljen i kult Sv. Roka kao zaštitnika grada. Prema pisanim izvorima to čak pratimo bez većih poteškoća. Tim prije što se tu radi o jednoj povijesnoj osobi, a i događanja koja su slijedila u samome Drnišu (kuga koja je u Drnišu harala od 1731-1732. g.), zapravo su glavni čimbenici zašto je Sv. Roko postao zaštitnikom ovoga grada. Možda bi čak bilo logičnije da je to bio Sv. Ante, no Drniš se ipak opredijelio za Sv. Roka. Premda je svetište podignuto u čast ovome svecu zapravo kapelica, to nije smetalo da ga se proglasi patronom grada. Sama ikonografija ovoga sveca najbolje svjedoči da je čitava povijest grada bila patnička, da je možda čitav slijed okolnosti želio da ovaj grad za patrona ima Sv. Roka. Za Drniš se slobodno može reći da je grad tragične sudbine i grad patnik, o čemu nam najbolje govore suvremena događanja.St. Roch has been worshipped in Drniš as early as the 18th century. We may say that the founding of the church – chapel of the same name (1731) marked the beginnings of this saint\u27s cult. Written sources have easily proved this. Primarily because he was a historical person and due to the events that followed in Drniš (plaque that was raging in the town from 1731 to 1732) St. Roch was established as the patron saint of this town

Ranokršćanski sakralni kompleks "Crkvina" u selu Trbounje kod Drniša

Lokalitet Crkvina nalazi se u selu Trbounje (zaselak Čupići), 5 km sjeverozapadno od grada Drniša. Smješten je uz samu cestu Oklaj – Miljevci, s njezine lijeve strane. Kompleks ranokršćanske arhitekture u Trbounju nastao je na periferiji jedne antičke (kasnoantičke) građevine najvjerojatnije villae rusticae. Sastoji se od centralne lađe sa svetištem, krstonice, katekumeneja, cisterne, narteksa, diakonikona (ranijeg oratorija s narteksom) te nizom pomoćnih prostorija nepoznate namjene. Najstariji objekt je oratorij s narteksom, kojeg bi se moglo datirati veoma rano - koncem IV. ili početkom V. stoljeća. Za precizniju vremensku dataciju svetišta i lađe, važan je oblik apside. Prema njezinom poligonalnom izgledu možemo ustvrditi da je crkva dograđena tijekom VI. st., vjerojatno nakon uspostavljanja bizantske vlasti u Dalmaciji 537. godine

New sources about the Hvar rebellion

Autori u članku navode važnost pisanih izvora za saznanja o povijesnim zbivanjima za vrijeme i prije ustanka hvarskih pučana 1510. – 1514. godine. Donose kronologiju istraživanja, pronalaženja i interpretacije pisanih izvora u hrvatskoj historiografiji, te nekoliko novootkrivenih izvora iz Kaptolskog arhiva u Hvaru te Arhiva Župe sv. Nikole u Komiži na Visu. Novi izvori iz Komiže vezani su više za događanja iz veljače 1510., odnosno zbivanja oko čuda sv. Križića i načina kako se u Crkvi obilježavao taj dan.Authors emphasize importance of relevant written sources regarding reconstruction of the events during and before the Hvar rebellion, popular uprising that lasted from 1510 until 1514. They deliver chronology of the uprising, as well as historiographical interpretations of written sources about the rebellion. Moreover, authors introduce several new sources from the Chapter Archives of Hvar, and Archives of the parish Komiža from the island of Vis. The new sources from Komiža speak more about the events from February 1510, when the miracle of St Cross occurred, and the source brings news about how this miracle was commemorated within the Church. Th first newly found document from the Chapter Archives of Hvar speaks about a great achievement of commoners (rebels) after the rebellion, and that was right to control finances of Hvar commune. Namely, this source is transcription of ducala of Leonardo Loredano from October 28, 1514, according to which the new magistrate in Hvar had to elect an additional treasurer, who had to be a commoner. During renovation of parish spaces (Kuratije) in Komiža, don Ivica Huljev, local parish priest, have found two interesting manuscripts related to the miracle of St Cross, the event that predeceased the Hvar rebellion. The first manuscript is already known in historiography under the title Carte attinente alla miracolosa Crocetta della Chiesa Catedrale di Lesina [Collection of documents regarding the miraculous Cross of the cathedral church in Hvar], and this copy is named Raccolta di variae Memorie attinenti al Miracolo del SSmo Crocifisso, che si conserva nella Catedrale di Lesina [Collection of various memories regarding the Holy Crucifix that is kept in the cathedral of Hvar]. This transcription had date February 24, 1783, but beside the different title the document is almost the same to the original manuscript. The most important difference in this manuscript that distinguishes it from other copies, are last two pages where one can find three hymns that were supposed to be read during the “Devine Office of miraculous blood of St Crucifix of Our Lord in the city and bishopric of Hvar”. After these three hymns one can also read a brief note of Mihovil Milinković, who is author of the verses. These three hymns and their author are connection between the first manuscript and another one that contains “Devine Office of miraculous blood of the Holy Crucifix” and “Devine Office of St Stephen, pope and martyr”. Therefore, one could assume that the Devine Office, that is breviary, was written between 1759 and 1761, and the later transcription was made after 1775. Divine Office of the miraculous blood was read in the city and in the bishopric of Hvar on February 6, the day when St Cross is commemorated. Author of the Divine Office of the miraculous blood was Mihovil Milinković, who was born in 1705 in Vis. He was parish priest in Komiža between 1748 and 1760, and in Vis between 1764 and 1775. Commemoration day of St Cross for a long time was the only public memorial on popular uprising in Hvar, and the preserved Devine Office reveals in which way Church intended to interpret events that happened in February 1510. Newly discovered sources: ducala of dodge Lauredana (1514) and Divine Office of the miraculous blood of the Holy Crucifix from the second half of the eighteenth century corroborate results of previous research but in addition these sources can provide impetus for further researc

Proceedings from the 8th and 9th Scientific Conference Methodology and Archaeometry

Methodology and Archaeometry (MetArh) is an annual scientific conference organized since 2013 by the Department of Archaeology of the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences of the University of Zagreb, and the Croatian Archaeological Society.The goal of the conference is to entice interdisciplinarity, critical thinking, new insights and approaches as well as new theoretical frameworks in contemporary archaeological science. It offers a wider perspective in observing methodology and methodological practices, also challenging traditional approaches in archaeological research, and following the creative adaptation of methods from other disciplines into archaeology. Also, it enables scholars to present their work, engage in discussion and motivate young scholars and archaeology students to pursue contemporary topics and present their research.This edition of the conference Proceedings contains twelve papers from the 8th and 9th MetArh conference which was held at the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences of the University of Zagreb. The 8th MetArh conference was held from 3rd – 4th of December 2020, and the 9th from 2nd – 3rd of December 2021 (https://metarh.ffzg.unizg.hr/).Due to COVID-19, both conferences were held on the online platform Hopin.to. It was very challenging to organize and realize the conference in a virtual format but, most importantly, it produced high-quality works some of which are published in this publication. Papers in this volume are focused on different aspects of archaeological methodology and archaeometry, including case studies from Croatia, Slovenia, Serbia and Ukraine.Methodology and Archaeometry (MetArh) is an annual scientific conference organized since 2013 by the Department of Archaeology of the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences of the University of Zagreb, and the Croatian Archaeological Society.The goal of the conference is to entice interdisciplinarity, critical thinking, new insights and approaches as well as new theoretical frameworks in contemporary archaeological science. It offers a wider perspective in observing methodology and methodological practices, also challenging traditional approaches in archaeological research, and following the creative adaptation of methods from other disciplines into archaeology. Also, it enables scholars to present their work, engage in discussion and motivate young scholars and archaeology students to pursue contemporary topics and present their research.This edition of the conference Proceedings contains twelve papers from the 8th and 9th MetArh conference which was held at the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences of the University of Zagreb. The 8th MetArh conference was held from 3rd – 4th of December 2020, and the 9th from 2nd – 3rd of December 2021 (https://metarh.ffzg.unizg.hr/).Due to COVID-19, both conferences were held on the online platform Hopin.to. It was very challenging to organize and realize the conference in a virtual format but, most importantly, it produced high-quality works some of which are published in this publication. Papers in this volume are focused on different aspects of archaeological methodology and archaeometry, including case studies from Croatia, Slovenia, Serbia and Ukraine

Dva izvješća o spomenicima kulture

Autor u tekstu daje preliminarno izvješće o ratnim štetama na spomeničkoj baštini okupiranoga dijela drniškoga kraja te popis radova Ivana Meštrovića u Drnišu i Otavicama do 1991. godine