Research, Evaluation and Sustainability: Reflecting on 15 Years of Experience in eHealth

In this paper we reflect on 15 years of experience in eHealth research and evaluation in the UK. An integrated, interroperable eHealth programme has yet to materialise. The initial promise that eHealth interventions can facilitate the shaping of the 21st century healthcare systems Stead et al. [1], has not been empirically demonstrated in the past decade. Although isolated cases of successful initiatives exist, the potential of eHealth remains largely unrealised Muuraiskangas et al. [2-4]. Investment in large programmes which aim to develop an integrated and interoperable platform across settings and levels of care, such as the NPfIT in the UK, may not have provided good value for money. Worse still, patient’s safety may have also been compromised Han et al. [5]. Similarly, to eCommerce, eGovernment and eLearning, eHealth (Table 1) was the result of both a demand by consumers and an initiative by government. It was therefore initially considered a paradox that it failed to deliver the much anticipated benefits. a paradox that it failed to deliver the muchanticipated benefits. A closer study of the various implementation programmes reveals the reasons for the relative failure of the UK to have a homogeneous and interoperable eHealth platform

A systematic review on the barriers and facilitators to physical activity in informal / unpaid carers in the UK

What are the barriers and facilitators to physical activity in unpaid / informal carers in the UK

Retrospective medical record research: Reflections of a unsponsored researcher.

This article is a reflective narrative by the author following the successful completion of a doctoral thesis involving the analysis of primary care data. The aim of the study was to identify patterns in signs and symptoms preceding a clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). Here, we discuss the challenges of conducting research using the patient medical health records as a non-sponsored researcher. The narrative explores the experiences of undertaking practice recruitment, issues that arose around access to data and the requirement for stakeholder commitment, with proposals for other similar projects that attempt to undertake research using patients’ data. The Gibbs reflective cycle was adopted in this narrative. This model encourages a clear description of events, analysis of personal feelings, evaluation of the experience, conclusions as to the options that were considered and actions to take if faced with the same study methods (involving primary care practitioners and/or the review of patient records). It also allows a structured reflection while simultaneously discussing the barriers and facilitators to undertaking a retrospective medical record research. The researcher also proposes some recommendation(s) to overcoming barriers to recruitment in primary care

A systematic review of parenting interventions used by social workers to support vulnerable children

This paper reports on the findings from a systematic review of parenting interventions used by social workers to support vulnerable children in the United Kingdom. The study focused on children from birth to 11 years and 11 months based on Munro's rationale for early intervention. From the 423 papers initially identified, twelve met the inclusion criteria for this review. Four common themes were identified: developing relationships, the effectiveness of parenting interventions, societal impact on families and health and psychological concerns. The importance of effective relationships between parents and social workers was identified as key to effective parental interventions but there was limited evidence of improved outcomes for children despite this. A common factor in the studies was the level of parental deprivation which in many cases was associated with a range of mental health issues frequently seen in association with drug and alcohol abuse and domestic violence. The review identified a number of successful outcomes across a range of parenting interventions. However, what was surprising was the limited input from the children themselves within this review. Applying our findings to practice, the authors recommend a number of ways to contribute to the development of parenting interventions