58 research outputs found
DFT Studies of the Selective CāO Hydrogenolysis and Ring-Opening of Biomass-Derived Tetrahydrofurfuryl Alcohol over Rh(111) surfaces
Tetrahydrofurfuryl
alcohol (THFA) has been identified as a platform
chemical of interest because of its production from biomass. It can
be converted into valuable alcohols and ethers by selective hydrogenation/hydrogenolysis
reaction over Rh-based metal catalysts. To better understand the chemistry
of THFA, the reaction energies and the corresponding energy barriers
of selective CāO bond hydrogenolysis and ring-opening of THFA
on Rh(111) for the formation of 2-methyltetrahydrofuran (2-MeTHF),
1,5-pentanediol (1,5-PeD), and 1,2-pentanediol (1,2-PeD) were studied
using density functional theory (DFT) calculations. The results indicate
that starting from THFA to produce 2-MeTHF, the direct CāO
bond cleavage of the CH<sub>2</sub>OH group is not favored. Alternatively
and more preferentially, the reaction occurs through the initial activation
of CāH bond on the side chain, followed by dehydroxylation
and hydrogenation. On the other hand, in the metal catalyzed ring-opening
process of THFA to 1,5-PeD and 1,2-PeD, the first dehydrogenation
of secondary CHāO or primary CH<sub>2</sub>āO moiety
in the ring decreases the barriers of the subsequent CāO bond
dissociation. Moreover, the energy span theory shows that the ring-opening
at the sterically less-hindered primary CāO bond exhibits a
lower effective barrier than that for ring-opening at the more sterically
hindered secondary CāO bond, as well as hydrogenolysis at the
side CH<sub>2</sub>OH chain, suggesting that the formation of 1,2-PeD
is much kinetically favored than the formation of 1,5-PeD and 2-MeTHF.
Our theoretical results give a good explanation for the experimental
fact that 1,2-PeD was the dominant product observed on unprompted
Rh/SiO<sub>2</sub>
Role of MoO<sub>3</sub> on a Rhodium Catalyst in the Selective Hydrogenolysis of Biomass-Derived Tetrahydrofurfuryl Alcohol into 1,5-Pentanediol
Selective
hydrogenolysis of biomass-derived tetrahydrofurfuryl
alcohol (THFA) to produce 1,5-pentanediol (1,5-PeD) is accomplished
by a binary catalyst consisting of MoO<sub>3</sub> and supported Rh
nanoparticles; a 1,5-PeD selectivity up to 80% is achieved in the
present work. Moreover, a very interesting phase-transfer behavior
for MoO<sub>3</sub> during the reaction is observed with the assistance
of different characterization techniques. In this process, MoO<sub>3</sub> dissolves partially in the liquid phase under the reaction
conditions and is transformed into the soluble hydrogen molybdenum
oxide bronzes (H<sub><i>x</i></sub>MoO<sub>3</sub>) in the
presence of H<sub>2</sub>, which are recognized as the genuinely active
sites for the CāO bond breaking of THFA. Density functional
theory (DFT) calculations were then carried out to simulate the plausible
mechanisms and highlight the role of Mo in the ring-opening process
of THFA in more detail. We propose that the formation of 1,5-PeD takes
place in a two consecutive reactions. THFA first undergoes acid-catalyzed
ring-opening process to form the key intermediate 5-hydroxypentanal
with the homogeneous catalysis of dissolved H<sub><i>x</i></sub>MoO<sub>3</sub>. The intermediate is then quickly hydrogenated
into 1,5-PeD under the heterogeneous catalysis of Rh. The concerted
āhydrogen-transferāring-openingā mechanism plausibly
explains the high reaction selectivity toward 1,5-PeD in the hydrogenolysis
of THFA and is verified by the reactivity trends of related substrates
Selection of sAPRIL-BP.
<p>(A) The binding affinity of phage clones No.1ā20 for sAPRIL were determined by ELISA. Clone 21 was used as a positive control. The fold change of the optical density was normalized to the positive control. Clones that had at least a 6-fold greater affinity than the positive control were considered āpositiveā for sAPRIL binding. (B) Three binding peptides were synthesized and their binding affinity with sAPRIL (black bars) was determined and compared with the negative control (NC) using ELISA. Cross-reactivity was assessed by measuring the binding affinity to BAFF (grey bars). (C) Clone BP1 (sAPRIL-BP) was mixed with sAPRIL at different doses to compete for binding with fixed LOVO cells.</p
Effect of sAPRIL-BP on the proliferation of LOVO and SW620 cells.
<p>(A) APRIL<sup>high</sup> LOVO and HCT116 cells and (B) APRIL<sup>low</sup> SW620 and HT-29 cells were treated with the indicated doses of sAPRIL binding peptides for 24, 48, and 72 h, and proliferation was determined using the CCK-8 kit. The rate of proliferation inhibition was calculated as: (%) = [(mean of OD<sub>control</sub>āmean of OD<sub>experimental</sub>) / mean of OD<sub>control</sub>]Ć100%.</p
<i>In vivo</i> effect of sAPRIL-BP on liver metastasis.
<p>LOVO cells were injected into the spleens of nude mice to observe experimental liver metastasis. Three weeks after injection, the mice were divided into 3 groups (N = 5) and treated with PBS (control), low (20 mg/kg), or high (40 mg/kg) doses of sAPRIL-BP every other day. Mice were sacrificed after two weeks of treatment with sAPRIL-BP. (A) Representative pictures of the metastatic liver tumors from each group are shown. (B) Numbers of metastatic nodules per mouse were recorded. *<i>P</i> <0.05 compared to control. #<i>P</i> <0.05 compared to the low dose group. (C) Numbers of metastatic nodules with the indicated size were recorded. Total numbers of metastatic nodules: n = 197 (Con), n = 130 (20 mg/kg), and n = 84 (40 mg/kg).</p
Effect of sAPRIL-BP on the expression of cell cycle-related proteins.
<p>LOVO cells were treated with the indicated doses of sAPRIL-BP for 48 h. (A) The expression levels of the indicated cell cycle proteins were assessed by Western Blotting analysis. GAPDH was used as the internal control. The protein size of Cyclin D1 is 34 kDa, Cyclin A 49 kDa, Cyclin E 50 kDa, Cyclin B1 55 kDa, CDK4 34 kDa, CDK6 37 kDa, p53 53 kDa, p27 27 kDa, p16 40 kDa, and GAPDH 36 kDa. The optical densities of the cyclin D1 (B) and CDK4 (C) protein bands were analyzed and normalized to the internal control as fold change. *<i>P</i><0.05 compared to Vehicle group; #<i>P</i><0.05 compared to 10 Ī¼M group, ā <i>P</i><0.05 compared to 20 Ī¼M group.</p
<i>In vivo</i> effect of sAPRIL-BP on proliferation and apoptosis in xenograft tumors.
<p>Paraffin embedded tumor tissues were used for morphological analysis with H&E staining (A), proliferation analysis with Ki67 staining (B), and apoptosis analysis with cleaved caspase-3 (cle-casp-3) staining (C). Representative pictures of the tumors from each group are shown (magnification 200Ć). The proliferation index (D) and apoptosis index (E) were calculated and normalized to the control (Con) group. *<i>p</i> <0.05 compared to control. #<i>p</i> <0.05 compared to 20 mg/kg group.</p
APRIL mRNA and protein expression in human colorectal cell lines.
<p>APRIL expression was assessed in five human colorectal cell lines (indicated) using RT-PCR (A) and Western Blotting (C). Representative gel images are shown. GAPDH was used as the internal control. The optical densities of the APRIL mRNA (B) and protein (D) bands were analyzed and normalized to the internal control. *<i>P</i><0.05 compared to SW620, HT-29, or SW480.</p
<i>In vivo</i> effects of sAPRIL-BP on tumor development.
<p>LOVO cells were injected subcutaneously into nude mice and allowed to grow for 3 weeks. Once the tumor was establishes, the mice were divided into 3 groups (N = 5) and treated with PBS (control), low (20 mg/kg), or high (40 mg/kg) dose of sAPRIL-BP every other day. (A) Representative examples of the tumors from each group are shown. Top panel: Scale bar, 8 mm. Bottom panel: Scale bar, 7 mm. (B) Mice were sacrificed after two weeks of treatment with sAPRIL-BP and the tumor weights were recorded. *<i>p</i> <0.05 compared to control. #<i>p</i> <0.05 compared to the low dose group. (C) The tumor volume was recorded every two days during treatment. *<i>p</i> <0.05 compared to control.</p
Characteristics of included studies.
<p>CTP, CT perfusion; HE, hematoma expansion; NA, not available; PCCT, post-contrast CT; SS, spot sign.</p><p>*Multicenter included Canada, Spain, Germany, Poland, India, and USA.</p><p>Characteristics of included studies.</p
- ā¦