11 research outputs found

    Exploring the supersymmetric U(1)B−L×_{B-L} \times U(1)R_{R} model with dark matter, muon g−2g-2 and Z′Z^\prime mass limits

    Full text link
    We study the low scale predictions of supersymmetric standard model extended by U(1)B−L×U(1)RU(1)_{B-L}\times U(1)_{R} symmetry, obtained from SO(10)SO(10) breaking via a left-right supersymmetric model, imposing universal boundary conditions. Two singlet Higgs fields are responsible for the radiative U(1)B−L×U(1)RU(1)_{B-L}\times U(1)_{R} symmetry breaking, and a singlet fermion SS is introduced to generate neutrino masses through inverse seesaw mechanism. The lightest neutralino or sneutrino emerge as dark matter candidates, with different low scale implications. We find that the composition of the neutralino LSP changes considerably depending on the neutralino LSP mass, from roughly half U(1)RU(1)_R bino, half MSSM bino, to singlet higgsino, or completely dominated by MSSM higgsino. The sneutrino LSP is statistically much less likely, and when it occurs it is a 50-50 mixture of right-handed sneutrino and the scalar S~\tilde S. Most of the solutions consistent with the relic density constraint survive the XENON 1T exclusion curve for both LSP cases. We compare the two scenarios and investigate parameter space points and find consistency with the muon anomalous magnetic moment only at the edge of 2σ2\sigma deviation from the measured value. However, we find that the sneutrino LSP solutions could be ruled out completely by strict reinforcement of the recent Z′Z^\prime mass bounds. We finally discuss collider prospects for testing the model

    Additional file 5: of The long non-coding RNA CYTOR drives colorectal cancer progression by interacting with NCL and Sam68

    No full text
    Figure S4. Knockdown of CYTOR inhibited anchorage-independent growth and migration/invasion.(A) qRT-PCR for detection of CYTOR in RKO, SW480 and SW620 cells knocked known by siRNAs of CYTOR. (B) Reduction of colony formation ability for CYTOR knockdown RKO and SW620 cells by siRNAs compared with control (NC). (C, D and E) Decrease of migration/invasive potential for CYTOR knockdown RKO (C), SW480 (D) and SW620 (E) cells by siRNAs compared with control by transwell assay. (JPG 2970 kb

    Additional file 8: of The long non-coding RNA CYTOR drives colorectal cancer progression by interacting with NCL and Sam68

    No full text
    Figure S7. Expression and biological function of NCL and Sam68 in CRC. (A) Higher expression of NCL in colorectal cancer than paired matched normal tissue samples from the GSE31737, GSE32323 and GSE41328 databases. (B) Higher expression of Sam68 in colorectal cancer than paired matched normal tissue samples from the GSE32323 database. (C) Decrease of the proliferation ability for NCL knockdown (siNCL) and Sam68 knockdown (siSam68) RKO cells compared with control (siNC) by CCK8. (D) Decrease of migration/invasive potentials for NCL knockdown (siNCL) and Sam68 knockdown (siSam68) RKO cells compared with control (siNC) by Transwell assay. (JPG 2659 kb

    Additional file 4: of The long non-coding RNA CYTOR drives colorectal cancer progression by interacting with NCL and Sam68

    No full text
    Figure S3. Funnel plots for the relationship between CYTOR and CRC prognosis. (A) Funnel plots of the association between CYTOR expression and overall survival at the cutoff value set according to the ROC. (B) Funnel plots of the association between CYTOR expression and disease- or recurrence-free survival at the cutoff value set by according to the ROC. (C) Funnel plots of the association between CYTOR expression and overall survival at the P50 cutoff value. (D) Funnel plots of the association between CYTOR expression and disease- or recurrence-free survival at the P50 cutoff value. (JPG 1257 kb

    Additional file 2: of The long non-coding RNA CYTOR drives colorectal cancer progression by interacting with NCL and Sam68

    No full text
    Figure S1. CYTOR expression and CRC prognosis. (A, B) Kaplan-Meier plots of overall survival (A) and recurrence-free survival (B) for CRC samples from the GSE17536 database. (C, D) Kaplan-Meier plots of overall survival (C) and recurrence-free survival (D) for CRC samples from the GSE17537 database. (E, F) Kaplan-Meier plots of overall survival (E) and recurrence-free survival (F) for CRC samples from the GSE56699 database. (G, H) Kaplan-Meier plots of overall survival for CRC samples from the GSE16125 (G) and GSE29621 (H) databases. (I, J, K, L) Kaplan-Meier plots of disease-free survival for CRC samples from the GSE24549-GPL11028 (I), GSE24549-GPL5175 (J), GSE24550-GPL11028 (K) and GSE24550-GPL5175 (L) databases. (M, N) Kaplan-Meier plots of recurrence-free survival for CRC samples from the GSE31595 (M) and GSE33113 (N) databases. (JPG 688 kb

    Additional file 9: of The long non-coding RNA CYTOR drives colorectal cancer progression by interacting with NCL and Sam68

    No full text
    Figure S8. Correlation analysis of NCL, Sam68 and EMT markers in GEO GSE38832 database. (A) Correlation between NCL and EMT markers. (B) Correlation between Sam68 and EMT markers. (JPG 432 kb

    Additional file 3: of The long non-coding RNA CYTOR drives colorectal cancer progression by interacting with NCL and Sam68

    No full text
    Figure S2. A meta-analysis of the association between CYTOR and CRC survival. (A) Forest plots of the association between CYTOR expression and overall survival at the cutoff value set according to the ROC. (B) Forest plots of the association between CYTOR expression and disease- or recurrence-free survival at the cutoff value set according to the ROC. (C) Forest plots of the association between CYTOR expression and overall survival at the P50 cutoff value. (D) Forest plots of the association between CYTOR expression and disease- or recurrence-free survival at the P50 cutoff value. (JPG 1781 kb

    Additional file 7: of The long non-coding RNA CYTOR drives colorectal cancer progression by interacting with NCL and Sam68

    No full text
    Figure S6. CYTOR location in cells and its binding proteins identified by ChIRP and MS. (A) RNA FISH to detection CYTOR location in RKO cells. (B) SDS-PAGE for protein isolation by ChIRP with CYTOR-specific probes. (C) MS identification of NCL and Sam68. (JPG 1204 kb
    corecore