2,805 research outputs found

    Stable nontrivial Z2 topology in ultrathin Bi (111) films: a first-principles study

    Full text link
    Recently, there have been intense efforts in searching for new topological insulator (TI) materials. Based on first-principles calculations, we find that all the ultrathin Bi (111) films are characterized by a nontrivial Z2 number independent of the film thickness, without the odd-even oscillation of topological triviality as commonly perceived. The stable nontrivial Z2 topology is retained by the concurrent band gap inversions at multiple time-reversal-invariant k-points and associated with the intermediate inter-bilayer coupling of the multi-bilayer Bi film. Our calculations further indicate that the presence of metallic surface states in thick Bi(111) films can be effectively removed by surface adsorption.Comment: 5 pages, 3 figure

    Reconsideration of the QCD corrections to the ηc\eta_c decays into light hadrons using the principle of maximum conformality

    Full text link
    In the paper, we analyze the ηc\eta_c decays into light hadrons at the next-to-leading order QCD corrections by applying the principle of maximum conformality (PMC). The relativistic correction at the O(αsv2){\cal{O}}(\alpha_s v^2)-order level has been included in the discussion, which gives about 10%10\% contribution to the ratio RR. The PMC, which satisfies the renormalization group invariance, is designed to obtain a scale-fixed and scheme-independent prediction at any fixed order. To avoid the confusion of treating nfn_f-terms, we transform the usual MS‾\overline{\rm MS} pQCD series into the one under the minimal momentum space subtraction scheme. To compare with the prediction under conventional scale setting, RConv,mMOM−r=(4.12−0.28+0.30)×103R_{\rm{Conv,mMOM}-r}= \left(4.12^{+0.30}_{-0.28}\right)\times10^3, after applying the PMC, we obtain RPMC,mMOM−r=(6.09−0.55+0.62)×103R_{\rm PMC,mMOM-r}=\left(6.09^{+0.62}_{-0.55}\right) \times10^3, where the errors are squared averages of the ones caused by mcm_c and ΛmMOM\Lambda_{\rm mMOM}. The PMC prediction agrees with the recent PDG value within errors, i.e. Rexp=(6.3±0.5)×103R^{\rm exp}=\left(6.3\pm0.5\right)\times10^3. Thus we think the mismatching of the prediction under conventional scale-setting with the data is due to improper choice of scale, which however can be solved by using the PMC.Comment: 5 pages, 2 figure

    The Υ(1S)\Upsilon(1S) leptonic decay using the principle of maximum conformality

    Full text link
    In the paper, we study the Υ(1S)\Upsilon(1S) leptonic decay width Γ(Υ(1S)→ℓ+ℓ−)\Gamma(\Upsilon(1S)\to \ell^+\ell^-) by using the principle of maximum conformality (PMC) scale-setting approach. The PMC adopts the renormalization group equation to set the correct momentum flow of the process, whose value is independent to the choice of the renormalization scale and its prediction thus avoids the conventional renormalization scale ambiguities. Using the known next-to-next-to-next-to-leading order perturbative series together with the PMC single scale-setting approach, we do obtain a renormalization scale independent decay width, ΓΥ(1S)→e+e−=1.262−0.175+0.195\Gamma_{\Upsilon(1S) \to e^+ e^-} = 1.262^{+0.195}_{-0.175} keV, where the error is squared average of those from αs(MZ)=0.1181±0.0011\alpha_s(M_{Z})=0.1181\pm0.0011, mb=4.93±0.03m_b=4.93\pm0.03 GeV and the choices of factorization scales within ±10%\pm 10\% of their central values. To compare with the result under conventional scale-setting approach, this decay width agrees with the experimental value within errors, indicating the importance of a proper scale-setting approach.Comment: 6 pages, 4 figure
    • …
    corecore