520 research outputs found

    Reconsideration of the QCD corrections to the ηc\eta_c decays into light hadrons using the principle of maximum conformality

    Full text link
    In the paper, we analyze the ηc\eta_c decays into light hadrons at the next-to-leading order QCD corrections by applying the principle of maximum conformality (PMC). The relativistic correction at the O(αsv2){\cal{O}}(\alpha_s v^2)-order level has been included in the discussion, which gives about 10%10\% contribution to the ratio RR. The PMC, which satisfies the renormalization group invariance, is designed to obtain a scale-fixed and scheme-independent prediction at any fixed order. To avoid the confusion of treating nfn_f-terms, we transform the usual MS‾\overline{\rm MS} pQCD series into the one under the minimal momentum space subtraction scheme. To compare with the prediction under conventional scale setting, RConv,mMOM−r=(4.12−0.28+0.30)×103R_{\rm{Conv,mMOM}-r}= \left(4.12^{+0.30}_{-0.28}\right)\times10^3, after applying the PMC, we obtain RPMC,mMOM−r=(6.09−0.55+0.62)×103R_{\rm PMC,mMOM-r}=\left(6.09^{+0.62}_{-0.55}\right) \times10^3, where the errors are squared averages of the ones caused by mcm_c and ΛmMOM\Lambda_{\rm mMOM}. The PMC prediction agrees with the recent PDG value within errors, i.e. Rexp=(6.3±0.5)×103R^{\rm exp}=\left(6.3\pm0.5\right)\times10^3. Thus we think the mismatching of the prediction under conventional scale-setting with the data is due to improper choice of scale, which however can be solved by using the PMC.Comment: 5 pages, 2 figure

    The Υ(1S)\Upsilon(1S) leptonic decay using the principle of maximum conformality

    Full text link
    In the paper, we study the Υ(1S)\Upsilon(1S) leptonic decay width Γ(Υ(1S)→ℓ+ℓ−)\Gamma(\Upsilon(1S)\to \ell^+\ell^-) by using the principle of maximum conformality (PMC) scale-setting approach. The PMC adopts the renormalization group equation to set the correct momentum flow of the process, whose value is independent to the choice of the renormalization scale and its prediction thus avoids the conventional renormalization scale ambiguities. Using the known next-to-next-to-next-to-leading order perturbative series together with the PMC single scale-setting approach, we do obtain a renormalization scale independent decay width, ΓΥ(1S)→e+e−=1.262−0.175+0.195\Gamma_{\Upsilon(1S) \to e^+ e^-} = 1.262^{+0.195}_{-0.175} keV, where the error is squared average of those from αs(MZ)=0.1181±0.0011\alpha_s(M_{Z})=0.1181\pm0.0011, mb=4.93±0.03m_b=4.93\pm0.03 GeV and the choices of factorization scales within ±10%\pm 10\% of their central values. To compare with the result under conventional scale-setting approach, this decay width agrees with the experimental value within errors, indicating the importance of a proper scale-setting approach.Comment: 6 pages, 4 figure

    Renormalization group improved pQCD prediction for Υ(1S)\Upsilon(1S) leptonic decay

    Get PDF
    The complete next-to-next-to-next-to-leading order short-distance and bound-state QCD corrections to Υ(1S)\Upsilon(1S) leptonic decay rate Γ(Υ(1S)→ℓ+ℓ−)\Gamma(\Upsilon(1S)\to \ell^+\ell^-) has been finished by Beneke {\it et al.} \cite{Beneke:2014qea}. Based on those improvements, we present a renormalization group (RG) improved pQCD prediction for Γ(Υ(1S)→ℓ+ℓ−)\Gamma(\Upsilon(1S)\to \ell^+\ell^-) by applying the principle of maximum conformality (PMC). The PMC is based on RG-invariance and is designed to solve the pQCD renormalization scheme and scale ambiguities. After applying the PMC, all known-type of β\beta-terms at all orders, which are controlled by the RG-equation, are resummed to determine optimal renormalization scale for its strong running coupling at each order. We then achieve a more convergent pQCD series, a scheme- independent and more accurate pQCD prediction for Υ(1S)\Upsilon(1S) leptonic decay, i.e. ΓΥ(1S)→e+e−∣PMC=1.270−0.187+0.137\Gamma_{\Upsilon(1S) \to e^+ e^-}|_{\rm PMC} = 1.270^{+0.137}_{-0.187} keV, where the uncertainty is the squared average of the mentioned pQCD errors. This RG-improved pQCD prediction agrees with the experimental measurement within errors.Comment: 11 pages, 4 figures. Numerical results and discussions improved, references updated, to be published in JHE
    • …
    corecore