37 research outputs found
Diagnostic performances of B-mode US and combined SWE and color Doppler US in differentiating phyllodes tumor from fibroadenoma for the subgroup of 30 equivocal fibroepithelial lesions diagnosed by core-needle biopsy.
<p>Diagnostic performances of B-mode US and combined SWE and color Doppler US in differentiating phyllodes tumor from fibroadenoma for the subgroup of 30 equivocal fibroepithelial lesions diagnosed by core-needle biopsy.</p
Characteristics of the 67 breast fibroepithelial lesions in 67 patients.
<p>Characteristics of the 67 breast fibroepithelial lesions in 67 patients.</p
Diagnostic performances of B-mode US, SWE and color Doppler US in differentiating phyllodes tumor from fibroadenoma.
<p>Diagnostic performances of B-mode US, SWE and color Doppler US in differentiating phyllodes tumor from fibroadenoma.</p
Receiver operating characteristic curves of B-mode US alone and combined use of shear-wave elastography (SWE) and color Doppler US.
<p>(a) For the total 67 fibroepithelial lesions, the area under the curves (AUCs) for ‘E<sub>mean</sub> >43.9 kPa or high vascularity*’ (0.786, left) and ‘E<sub>max</sub> > 46.1 kPa or high vascularity*’ (0.755, right), were compared to the AUC of B-mode US (0.687). (b) For the subgroup of 30 equivocal fibroepithelial lesions, AUCs for ‘E<sub>mean</sub> >43.9 kPa or high vascularity*’ (0.719, left) and ‘E<sub>max</sub> > 46.1 kPa or high vascularity*’ (0.656, right) were compared to the AUC of B-mode US (0.558). *Equal to or greater than 2 vessel-flow signals were observed on color Doppler US.</p
A 36-year-old woman diagnosed with equivocal fibroepithelial lesion by US-guided biopsy, which was confirmed as fibroadenoma on surgical excision.
<p>(a) The B-mode US image shows a 1.4-cm breast mass with BI-RADS category 4a (arrows), (b) the color Doppler US image shows low vascularity, and (c) the SWE image shows E<sub>mean</sub> of 12.8 kPa and E<sub>max</sub> of 17.1 kPa.</p
Flowchart of study sample selection.
<p><i>US</i>- <i>CNB</i>, Ultrasonography-guided core needle biopsy; <i>US-VAE</i>, Ultrasonography-guided vacuum-assisted excision; <i>PACS</i>, Picture archiving and communications system; <i>SWE</i>, Shear-wave elastography.</p
A 64-year-old asymptomatic female with an abnormality on screening mammography.
<p>(A) Magnification mammography demonstrates pleomorphic clustered microcalcifications in the right lower outer breast. (B) This lesion shows tubular isoechoic lesion with microcalcifications on US. The pathologic findings of both Wi-UVAB and surgical excision were pleomorphic LCIS.</p
US Findings and BI-RADS classification in 103 Target Lesions of Wireless US-guided Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy in 96 Women.
<p>US Findings and BI-RADS classification in 103 Target Lesions of Wireless US-guided Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy in 96 Women.</p
Comparison of Accurately Diagnosed and Underestimated Lesions.
<p>P values were calculated by student T-test and fisher’s exact test.</p><p>Comparison of Accurately Diagnosed and Underestimated Lesions.</p
Histologic Results of Wireless US-guided Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy (Wi-UVAB) and Surgical Biopsy in 103 Cases in 96 Women.
<p>Number in parentheses are the number of the cases. MIBC, microinvasive breast carcinoma; IDC, invasive ductal carcinoma; ILC, invasive lobular carcinoma; DCIS, ductal carcinoma in situ; LCIS, lobular carcinoma in situ; N/A, Not available due to non-operation.</p><p>Histologic Results of Wireless US-guided Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy (Wi-UVAB) and Surgical Biopsy in 103 Cases in 96 Women.</p