gevo-iiswc.tar

This artifact contrains the modified GPU-BSW and simcovGPU program for GEVO to evolve. Besides, the evolving history we report in the paper that will appear on IISWC 2022 are included. </p

Improved Active Noise Control Systems With Online Secondary Path Modeling and External Disturbance

在主動噪音控制系統中，必須要先鑑別第二路徑的動態轉移函數，而如今有兩種常用的鑑別方法，第一種是離線鑑別方式取得，另一種是使用線上鑑別方式取的，但考慮第二路徑會有時變的情況，另外適應性濾波器的權重更新會受到誤差麥克風測量到不相關噪音，影響消音性能。因此本文提出帶外部干擾與線上第二路徑鑑別之改良式主動噪音控制系統，並用補償器補償過程中的干擾，以提升較好的性能與適應性。In active noise control (ANC) system, it is necessary to get the transfer function of the secondary path. There are two common methods of identification, first is obtained off-line identification, the other is taken to use the online identification method, however, the secondary path will be a time-variant system, in addition, weights update of an adaptive filter will affected by disturbance picked up by the error microphone, leading to the degradation of system performance. This treatise propose an improved active noise control systems with online secondary path modeling and external disturbance, and compensator used to compensate the disturbance that produced during the processer, in order to promote the control performance and adaptability.摘要 I ABSTRACT II 論文目錄 III 第一章 緒論 1 1.1研究動機 1 1.2文獻回顧 1 1.3論文概要 3 第二章 現有的主動噪音控制系統 5 2.1 線上第二路徑鑑別之主動噪音系統 5 2.2帶外部干擾之主動噪音控制系統 11 第三章 帶外部干擾與線上第二路徑鑑別之改良式主動噪音控制系統 15 3.1 最佳可變步階演算法之推導 15 3.1.1鑑別器之最佳步階的推導 16 3.1.2輔助鑑別器推導 20 3.1.3控制器之最佳步階的推導 22 3.1.4輔助控制器推導 25 3.2改良式主動噪音控制系統 27 3.3演算法之實現 30 3.3.1鑑別器的OVSS-NLMS演算法之實現 30 3.4.2控制器的ROVSS-NFxLMS演算法之實現 32 第四章 主動噪音控制之電腦模擬 34 4.1 ROVSS-NLMS/CE_DC-ANPS演算法之電腦模擬 38 4.2演算法使用不同參數之電腦模擬 43 4.3 改變路徑下之電腦模擬 48 4.3.1第二路徑改變 48 4.3.2第一路徑及第二路徑同時改變 50 4.4各種情況下ROVSS-NLMS/CE_DC演算法之模擬比較 51 4.4.1在帶外部干擾情況下有無輔助控制器之比較 51 4.4.2輔助噪音功率調整使用不同誤差訊號之比較 52 4.4.3既有最佳可變步階與本文改良式之比較 54 第五章 結論與未來展望 58 5.1 結論 58 5.2 未來展望 58 參考文獻 5

Characterization of anti-Eavas immunoreactivity in female colonies.

<p>Immunohistochemical analysis with the anti-Eavas antibody was performed to examine Eavas immunoreactivity (irEavas) in cells at different developmental stages of oogenesis. <b>A</b>. irEavas-positive oogonia located along the mesoglea (arrowheads) of samples harvested in May, just 5 days after spawning. m, mesoglea. <b>B</b>. A higher magnification view of the inset shown in <b>A</b>. Arrows indicate oogonia that display irEavas staining. <b>C</b>. irEavas-positive oocytes in the mesentery of corals that were sampled in August (stages I–II). <b>D</b>. A higher magnification view of the inset shown in <b>C</b>. The arrows indicate oocytes that display irEavas staining. <b>E</b>. irEavas-positive oocytes in the mesentery of coral samples collected in October (stage II). <b>F</b>. irEavas-positive oocytes from a February coral sample (stages III–IV). <b>G</b>. An oocyte (dotted line) from a coral sample collected in April (stage V). The arrows indicate irEavas-positive nuclei. The scale bars correspond to 100 µm in panels <b>A</b>, <b>C</b>, and <b>E–G</b> and 10 µm in panels <b>B</b> and <b>D</b>.</p

The deduced protein sequence of Eavas and schematic of the Eavas domain structure.

<p><b>A</b>. The deduced Eavas amino acid sequence. <i>*</i>, motifs conserved among DEAD-box protein family members; <i>black dotted line</i>, CCHC zinc fingers; <i>black box with dotted line</i>, RGG motif; <i>black box</i>, location of the antigen sequence used for antibody production. <b>B</b>. Schematic figure depicting the Eavas domain structure and regions that are highly homologous among the Vasa subfamilies. Vertical lines mark the positions of the nine conserved DEAD-box motifs. <b>C</b>. A phylogenetic tree comparing the amino acid sequences of Vasa- and PL10-related proteins from various taxa. The region used for this analysis corresponds to the sequence AFLLPV…LDEA (from 276 to 385 residues of Eavas), where are available and comparable region among various taxa. The sequences were aligned by a multiple sequence alignment using MUSCLE. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbor-joining method. The number at each node represents the bootstrap probability (%); the branches shown correspond to values of 50% and higher. The names and corresponding GenBank accession numbers of the proteins analyzed are as follows: Acropora CnVas (<i>Acropora digitifera</i>, BAB13683), Euphyllia Eavas (<i>Euphyllia ancora</i>, JQ968407), Nematostella Nvvas1 (<i>Nematostella vectensis</i>, AAW29073), Nematostella Nvvas2 (<i>Nematostella vectensis</i>, AAW29074), Tima Cnvas1 (<i>Tima Formosa</i>, BAB13687), Hydractinia Cnvas (<i>Hydractinia echinata</i>, BAB13686), Hydra Cnvas1 (<i>Hydra vulgaris</i>, BAB13307), Hydra Cnvas2 (<i>Hydra vulgaris</i>, BAB13308), Ephydatia PoVAS1 (<i>Ephydatia fluviatilis</i>, BAB13310), Ciona Ci DEAD1 (<i>Ciona intestinalis</i>, BAA36710), Xenopus XVLG1 (<i>Xenopus laevis</i>, NP_001081728), Danio vasa (<i>Danio rerio</i>, AAI29276), Gallus Cvh (<i>Gallus gallus</i>, BAB12337), Rattus VLG (<i>Rattus sp</i>., AAB33364), Mus Mvh (<i>Mus musculus</i>, BAA03584), Schistocerca vasa-like (<i>Schistocerca gregaria</i>, AF510054), Drosophila vasa (<i>Drosophila melanogaster</i>, NP_723899), Bombyx BmVLG (<i>Bombyx mori</i>, BAA19572), Acropora CnPL10 (<i>Acropora digitifera</i>, BAB13676), Euphyllia EaPL10 (<i>Euphyllia ancora</i>, JQ968406), Nematostella NvPL10 (<i>Nematostella vectensis</i>, AAW29072), Hydractinia CnPL10 <i>(Hydractinia echinata</i>, BAB13679), Hydra CnPL10 (<i>Hydra vulgaris</i>, BAB13306), Ephydatia PoPL10 (<i>Ephydatia fluviatilis</i>, BAB13309), Danio pl10 (<i>Danio rerio</i>, NP_571016), Xenopus ddx3x (<i>Xenopus laevis</i>, NP_001080283), Mus PL10 (<i>Mus musculus</i>, AAA39942), Mus p68 (<i>Mus musculus</i>, CAA46581), and Saccharomyces p68 (<i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i>, CAA36874).</p

Characterization of anti-Eavas immunoreactivity in male colonies.

<p>Immunohistochemical analysis with the anti-Eavas antibody was conducted to examine Eavas immunoreactivity (irEavas) in cells at different stages of spermatogenesis. <b>A</b>. irEavas-positive spermatogonia located along the mesenterial mesoglea of a coral sample harvested in August (stage 0). <b>B</b>. A higher magnification view of the inset shown in <b>A</b>. Arrowheads indicate spermatogonia that display darker Eavas staining than others. <b>C</b>. Spermatogonia located along the mesenterial mesoglea of a coral sample harvested in October (late stage 0). The arrows indicate small spermatogonial clusters. <b>D</b>. A higher magnification view of the inset shown in <b>C</b>. The arrow indicates a spermatogonial cluster. The arrowheads indicate spermatogonia that exhibit darker irEavas staining compared with other spermatogonia. <b>E</b>. irEavas-positive spermatogonia located in the mesentery of a coral sampled in December (stage I). The arrows indicate spermatogonial clusters. <b>F</b>. A higher magnification view of the inset shown in <b>E</b>. <b>G</b>. irEavas stained spermatocytes located in the mesentery of a coral sampled in March (stage II). The arrows indicate the clusters within the mesoglea. <b>H</b>. A higher magnification view of the inset shown in <b>G</b>. <b>I</b>. Immunohistochemical analysis with the anti-Eavas antibody to examine Eavas immunoreactivity in stage III and IV male germ cells that were collected in April. <b>J</b>. Immunohistochemical analysis of stage V male germ cells collected in May. III, stage III; IV, stage IV; V, stage V. <b>K</b>. Immunohistochemical characterization of the anti-Eavas antibody using stage I male germ cells. <b>L</b>. The anti-Eavas antibody was preadsorbed with the peptide antigen. The preadsorbed control sample was nearly devoid of immunoreactivity. The arrow points to a cluster of male germ cells. The scale bars correspond to 50 µm in panels <b>A</b>, <b>C</b>, <b>E</b>, <b>G</b>, <b>I</b> and <b>J</b>, and 10 µm in panels <b>B</b>, <b>D</b>, <b>F</b>, <b>H</b>, <b>K</b> and <b>L</b>.</p

Maps of the sampling location.

<p>The maps are showing the sampling location in Nanwan Bay at the southern coast of Taiwan.</p

Characterization of anti-Eavas immunoreactivity in tentacle and mesenterial filament.

<p><b>A</b>. irEavas-positive cells in the tentacle region. <b>B</b>. Higher magnification views of the insets shown in <b>A</b>. The arrows indicate irEavas-positive cells. <b>C</b>. irEavas-positive cells from a mesenterial filament. <b>D</b>. Higher magnification views of the insets shown in <b>C</b>. The scale bars represent 50 µm in panels <b>A</b> and <b>C</b> and 20 µm in panels <b>B</b> and <b>D</b>. m, mesoglea; ect, ectoderm; end, endoderm.</p

Tissue distribution of <i>Eavas</i> mRNAs and characterization of the anti-Eavas antibody.

<p><b>A</b>. The tissue distribution of <i>Eavas</i> transcripts was determined by semiquantitative RT-PCR analysis of male and female coral samples collected in Februay 2011. The samples examined include whole tissue, isolated tentacles, and the mesentery, the latter of which encompasses the gonad. β-Actin was used as the internal control. Reactions lacking either the reverse transcriptase (RT−) or template (N.C.) were included as negative controls for each set of reactions. <b>B</b>. Western blotting analysis of the anti-Eavas antibody. Protein extracts prepared from a Februay 2011 male sample (12.5 µg) were separated by SDS-PAGE. After transferring to a nitrocellulose membrane, the proteins were immunoblotted with the anti-Eavas antibody (anti-Eavas) or the anti-Eavas antibody preadsorbed with the peptide antigen (preadsorbed). The molecular weight markers are shown in the middle.</p