Effects of upper extremity surgery on activities and participation of children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review

Aim: To evaluate and synthesize the evidence for effects of upper extremity surgery (UES) on activities and participation of children and adolescents with cerebral palsy (CP). Method: The databases MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO were searched for publications up to September 2018. Studies included were comparative studies with or without concurrent comparison groups or case series with pretest/posttest outcomes with a minimal sample size of 10 participants; those that reported the effects of UES with a follow-up time of at least 5 months; those including patients diagnosed with CP aged up to 20 years; and those that used a validated activity-based instrument. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I (Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions) tool and quality assessment was performed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Results: Twelve studies, involving 310 children and adolescents, were included. The ability and perception of the patient to use the hand(s) and perform activities (measured with the Shriners Hospital Upper Extremity Evaluation, Assisting Hand Assessment, and House Functional Classification) improved significantly after UES. The quality of evidence was very low for each of the activity outcomes of interest. Interpretation: The very low evidence prohibits recommendations on the use of UES to guide clinical practice. More high-quality comparative studies are needed to obtain better insight into the effects of UES on activities and participation. What this paper adds: Low quality of evidence for effects of upper extremity surgery (UES) on activities and participation. Limited evidence for improvement in activities and participation after UES

Effects of upper-extremity surgery on manual performance of children and adolescents with cerebral palsy a multidisciplinary approach using shared decision-making

Background: Little is known about the effects of upper-extremity surgery on the manual performance of children and adolescents with cerebral palsy (CP). This clinical cohort study describes our experience with patient selection based on multidisciplinary assessment and shared decision-making and the effects of upper-extremity surgery on manual performance and patient-relevant outcomes. Methods: All patients (up to 20 years of age) with CP referred to our multidisciplinary team for evaluation for upper-extremity surgery between July 2011 and May 2017 were included. Suitability for upper-extremity surgery was assessed with comprehensive, multidisciplinary screening, and the decision to proceed with surgery was made together with the patient. Individual patient-relevant goals were identified with the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM); perceived independence in performing bimanual activities at home was assessed with the ABILHAND-Kids tool, and perceived quality of use of the affected hand during daily activities was assessed with a visual analog scale (VAS). The quality of use of the affected hand during bimanual performance was measured with the Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA), and gross manual dexterity was evaluated with the Box and Block Test (BBT). All baseline assessments were repeated at an average of 9 months after the surgery. Results: Of 66 patients assessed by the multidisciplinary upper-extremity-surgery team, 44 were considered eligible for upper-extremity surgery. Of these patients, 39 (mean age and standard deviation [SD], 14.9 ± 2.10 years, 87% with unilateral CP, and 72% at Manual Ability Classification System [MACS] level II) underwent upper-extremity surgery and were evaluated in the pre-post study. All outcomes improved significantly after upper-extremity surgery, with average improvements of 3.1 ± 1.6 points in the COPM-Performance (COPM-P) score (p < 0.001), 3.3 ± 2.1 points in the COPM-Satisfaction (COPM-S) score (p < 0.001), 1.5 ± 1.2 logits in the ABILHAND score (p < 0.001), 2.4 ± 1.9 cm in the VAS score (p < 0.001), 6.7 ± 4.2 units in the AHA score (p < 0.001), and 2.2 ± 5.0 blocks/minute on the BBT (p = 0.021). The improvement in the COPM-P, COPM-S, ABILHAND, VAS, AHA, and BBT scores was clinically meaningful in 80%, 77%, 55%, 62%, 71%, and 31% of the patients, respectively. Conclusions: Careful assessment of eligibility for upper-extremity surgery, based on multidisciplinary screening and shared decision-making, resulted in a clinically relevant improvement in patient-specific functional and/or cosmetic goals and manual performance after upper-extremity surgery in most patients with CP. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence

Botulinum neurotoxin treatment in children with cerebral palsy: validation of a needle placement protocol using passive muscle stretching and relaxing

Aim To validate a detailed intramuscular needle placement protocol using passive muscle stretching and relaxing for botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) treatment in the lower extremity of children with spastic cerebral palsy (CP), with verification by electrical stimulation. MethodA prospective observational study was performed in 75 children with spastic CP who received regular BoNT-A treatment under general anaesthesia (52 males, 23 females; mean age 8y 9mo, SD 3y 7mo, range 4-18y; mean body mass index 16.2, SD 3.7, range 7.7-26.7). A total of 1084 intramuscular needle placements using passive muscle stretching and relaxing were verified by electrical stimulation. Primary outcome was the positive predictive value. ResultsIntramuscular needle placement in the muscles adductor brevis, adductor longus, gracilis, semimembranosus, semitendinosus, biceps femoris, rectus femoris, and lateral and medial heads of the gastrocnemius and soleus had a positive predictive value ranging from 85.7% to 100% (95% confidence interval ranging from 71.5-89.9% to 91.4-100%). InterpretationThis validated detailed protocol for intramuscular needle placement using passive muscle stretching and relaxing for BoNT-A treatment in the lower extremity of children with spastic CP is reliable and has a high positive predictive value

Marfan syndrome in childhood: Parents' perspectives of the impact on daily functioning of children, parents and family; A qualitative study

Background: Marfan syndrome (MFS) is a heritable connective tissue disease caused by a defect in FBN1. The diagnosis is based on the revised Ghent criteria. The main features involve the cardiovascular, musculoskeletal, ophthalmic, pulmonary systems and facial features. Although the clinical manifestations of MFS in children are thoroughly addressed in several studies, literature on the impact of MFS on daily functioning is restricted to pediatric advice on sports and leisure participation. Therefore, the full impact of MFS on daily functioning remains unclear. The aim of this qualitative study was to explore parents' perspectives on the impact of MFS on daily functioning of children with MFS aged 4-12 years, themselves and family regarding functional performance, activities, participation, personal and environmental factors, and disease burden. Methods: In this qualitative study parents participated in individual semi-structured interviews (n = 10) and 3 focus groups (n = 5, n = 5 and n = 6). Meetings were transcribed, and data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Meaningful concepts were coded, and concepts concerning children with MFS were linked to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health for Children and Youth. Thereafter themes were identified and interpreted. Results: Parents reported their children could not keep up with peers because of fatigue, pain and physical impairments. Children experienced participation restrictions in school, sports, play and other leisure activities. Parents reported their child as being different due to physical appearance, which provoked unsupportive attitudes. Parental burden was caused by high care needs, lack of support, a limited social life, and concerns about the child's development. Family burden was caused by adjusted and complex family schedules, other family members with MFS, and reproductive planning decision-making, whereas family cohesiveness and caring were positively perceived factors. Conclusions: Parents perceived a large impact of MFS on daily functioning of their children with MFS, themselves and their family. More awareness among all professionals involved in the care of children with MFS and their families is needed so that professionals can address their support needs and provide tailored interventions, rehabilitation and/or educational programs to empower and improve daily functioning of the children, parents and family

An exploratory study of clinical characteristics and gait features of adolescents with hypermobility disorders

Background: In adolescents with non-pathological and pathological joint hypermobility, gait deviations have been associated with pain and fatigue. It remains unclear what distinguishes the non-pathological form of joint hypermobility (JH) from pathological forms (i.e. hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (hEDS) or hypermobility spectrum disorders (HSD). Our objective was to identify discriminative clinical characteristics and biomechanical gait features between adolescents with hEDS/HSD, JH, and healthy controls (HC). Methods: Thirty-two adolescents were classified into three subgroups (hEDS/HSD=12, JH=5, HC=15). Clinical characteristics (e.g. pain intensity and surface, fatigue, functional disability) were inventoried. The gait pattern was assessed using a three-dimensional, eight-camera VICON MX1.3 motion capture system, operating at a sample rate of 100 Hz (VICON, Oxford, UK). Spatiotemporal parameters, joint angles (sagittal plane), joint work, joint impulse, ground reaction force and gait variability expressed as percentage using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) were assessed and analysed using multivariate analysis. Multivariate analysis data is expressed in mean differences(MD), standard error(SE) and P-values. Results: The hEDS/HSD-group had significantly higher fatigue score (+51.5 points, p = <0.001) and functional disability (+1.6, p < .001) than the HC-group. Pain intensity was significantly higher in the hEDS/HSD-group than the other subgroups (JH; +37 mm p = .004, HC; +38 mm, p = .001). The hEDS/HSD-group showed significantly more gait variability (JH; +7.2(2.0)% p = .003, HC; + 7.8(1.4)%, p = <0.001) and lower joint work (JH; −0.07(0.03)J/kg, p = .007, HC; − 0.06(0.03)J/kg, p = .013) than the other subgroups. The JH-group showed significantly increased ankle dorsiflexion during terminal stance (+5.0(1.5)degree, p = .001) compared to hEDS/HSD-group and knee flexion during loading response compared to HC-group (+5.7(1.8) degree, p = .011). Significance: A distinctive difference in gait pattern between adolescents with non-pathological and pathological joint hypermobility is found in gait variability, rather than in the biomechanical features of gait. This suggests that a specific gait variability metric is more appropriate than biomechanical individual joint patterns for assessing gait in adolescents with hEDS/HSD

Parenting a child with Marfan syndrome: distress and everyday problems

Marfan syndrome (MFS) is a multisystemic, autosomal dominant connective tissue disorder that occurs de novo in 25%. In many families, parent and child(ren) are affected, which may increase distress in parents. To assess distress, 42 mothers (29% MFS) and 25 fathers (60% MFS) of 43 affected children, completed the validated screening‐questionnaire Distress thermometer for parents of a chronically ill child, including questions on overall distress (score 0–10; ≥4 denoting “clinical distress”) and everyday problems (score 0–36). Data were compared to 1,134 control‐group‐parents of healthy children. Mothers reported significantly less overall distress (2, 1–4 vs. 3, 1–6; p = .049; r = −.07) and total everyday problems (3, 0–6 vs. 4, 1–8; p = .03; r = −.08) compared to control‐group‐mothers. Mothers without MFS reported significantly less overall distress compared to mothers with MFS, both of a child with MFS (1, 0–4 vs. 3.5, 2–5; p = .039; r = −.17). No significant differences were found between the father‐groups, nor between the group of healthy parents of an affected child living together with an affected partner compared to control‐group‐parents. No differences in percentages of clinical distress were reported between mothers and control‐group‐mothers (33 vs. 42%); fathers and control‐group‐fathers (28 vs. 32%); nor between the other groups. Distress was not associated with the children's MFS characteristics. Concluding, parents of a child with MFS did not show more clinical distress compared to parents of healthy children. However, clinical distress was reported in approximately one‐third and may increase in case of acute medical complications. We advise monitoring distress in parents of a child with MFS to provide targeted support

Physical activity and physical fitness in children with heritable connective tissue disorders

ObjectivesHealth problems in patients with heritable connective tissue disorders (HCTD) are diverse and complex and might lead to lower physical activity (PA) and physical fitness (PF). This study aimed to investigate the PA and PF of children with heritable connective tissue disorders (HCTD).MethodsPA was assessed using an accelerometer-based activity monitor (ActivPAL) and the mobility subscale of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory Computer Adaptive Test (PEDI-CAT). PF was measured in terms of cardiovascular endurance using the Fitkids Treadmill Test (FTT); maximal hand grip strength, using hand grip dynamometry (HGD) as an indicator of muscle strength; and motor proficiency, using the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-2 (BOTMP-2).ResultsA total of 56 children, with a median age of 11.6 (interquartile range [IQR], 8.8–15.8) years, diagnosed with Marfan syndrome (MFS), n = 37, Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS), n = 6, and genetically confirmed Ehlers-Danlos (EDS) syndromes, n = 13 (including classical EDS n = 10, vascular EDS n = 1, dermatosparaxis EDS n = 1, arthrochalasia EDS n = 1), participated. Regarding PA, children with HCTD were active for 4.5 (IQR 3.5–5.2) hours/day, spent 9.2 (IQR 7.6–10.4) hours/day sedentary, slept 11.2 (IQR 9.5–11.5) hours/day, and performed 8,351.7 (IQR 6,456.9–1,0484.6) steps/day. They scored below average (mean (standard deviation [SD]) z-score −1.4 (1.6)) on the PEDI-CAT mobility subscale. Regarding PF, children with HCTD scored well below average on the FFT (mean (SD) z-score −3.3 (3.2)) and below average on the HGD (mean (SD) z-score −1.1 (1.2)) compared to normative data. Contradictory, the BOTMP-2 score was classified as average (mean (SD) z-score.02 (.98)). Moderate positive correlations were found between PA and PF (r(39) = .378, p &lt; .001). Moderately sized negative correlations were found between pain intensity and fatigue and time spent actively (r(35) = .408, p &lt; .001 and r(24) = .395 p &lt; .001, respectively).ConclusionThis study is the first to demonstrate reduced PA and PF in children with HCTD. PF was moderately positively correlated with PA and negatively correlated with pain intensity and fatigue. Reduced cardiovascular endurance, muscle strength, and deconditioning, combined with disorder-specific cardiovascular and musculoskeletal features, are hypothesized to be causal. Identifying the limitations in PA and PF provides a starting point for tailor-made interventions

Somatic symptoms, pain, catastrophizing and the association with disability among children with heritable connective tissue disorders

The aim of the present study was to investigate the nature and prevalence of nonspecific somatic symptoms, pain and catastrophizing in children with Heritable Connective Tissue Disorders (HCTD), and to determine their association with disability. This observational, multicenter study included 127 children, aged 4-18 years, with Marfan syndrome (MFS) (59%), Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS) (8%), Ehlers-Danlos syndromes (EDS) (12%) and hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (hEDS) (23%). The assessments included the Children's Somatization Inventory or parent proxy (CSI, PCSI), pain visual-analogue scale (VAS), SUPERKIDZ body diagram, Pain Catastrophizing Scale Child or parent proxy (PCS-C, PCS-P) and Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ-30). Data from children aged >= 8 years were compared to normative data. In children >= 8 years (n = 90), pain was present in 59%, with a median of 4 (IQR = 3-9) pain areas. Compared to normative data, the HCTD group reported significantly higher on the CSI (p <= 0.001, d = 0.85), VAS pain intensity (p <= 0.001, d = 1.22) and CHAQ-30 (p <= 0.001, d = 1.16) and lower on the PCS-C (p = 0.017, d = -0.82) and PCS-P (p <= 0.001, d = -0.49). The intensity of nonspecific somatic symptoms and pain explained 45% of the variance in disability (r(2) = 0.45 F(2,48) = 19.70, p <= 0.001). In children <= 7 years (n = 37), pain was present in 35% with a median of 5(IQR = 1-13) pain areas. The mean(SD) VAS scores for pain intensity was 1.5(2.9). Functional disability was moderately correlated to the number of pain areas (r = 0.56, p <= 0.001), intensity of nonspecific somatic symptoms (r = 0.63, p <= 0.001) and pain (r = 0.83, p <= 0.001). In conclusion, this study supports the need for comprehensive assessment of nonspecific somatic symptoms, pain, and disability in children with HCTD to allow tailored treatment