11 research outputs found

    Androgen-stimulated PAK6 activation promotes cell motility and invasion in LNCap cells stably expressing PAK6-WT, PAK6-5A and PAK6-5E.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Androgen stimulation promotes transwell cell migration of LNCap-PAK6-WT and LNCap-PAK6-5A cells. LNCap-PAK6-5E cells, albeit with elevated baseline motility, do not respond to androgen stimulation with increased migration. Data represent the mean ± SEM (n=3). **<i>p</i><0.01, ***<i>p</i><0.001 compared to their respective –DHT controls; Student’s <i>t</i>-test. (B) Androgen stimulation promotes matrigel invasion of LNCap PAK6-WT and LNCap-PAK6-5 cells. Similarly, LNCap-PAK6-5E cells, albeit with elevated baseline invasion, do not respond to androgen stimulation with increased invasion. Data represent the mean ± SEM (n=3). *<i>p</i><0.05, **<i>p</i><0.01 compared to their respective –DHT controls; Student’s <i>t</i>-test. (C) Representative micrographs of invaded LNCap and PAK6-derivertives cells depicted in (B). Scale bar: 50 μm. </p

    Androgen-stimulated PAK6 activation is mediated by androgen receptor. LAPC4 cells were plated overnight in IMDM supplemented with 10% charcoal-stripped fetal bovine serum.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Time course (0 h: non-treated) study of PAK6 activation in response to 10 nM dihydrotestosterone (DHT) stimulation in LAPC4 cells. (B) A DHT ten-fold serial dilution (0 nM: non-treated; and DHT-treated 0.1 nM to 1,000 nM) dose response of PAK6 activation. (C) 10 nM DHT does not activate PAK6 kinase activity in androgen receptor negative PC3-PAK6 cell. (D) PAK6 <i>in </i><i>vitro</i> kinase assay demonstrates knocking down of AR by siRNA diminishes androgen-stimulated PAK6 activation in LAPC4 cells. Middle panels depict the expression levels of AR and PAK6 in LNCap-PAK6 cells in response to AR specific siRNA. (E) Whole lysate of LNCap, LAPC4 and PC3 blot against anti-PAK6,anti-AR and anti-actin.</p

    Mapping PAK6-AR interacting domain by mammalian two-hybrid assay.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Schematic depiction of full-length PAK6 and boundaries of truncated PAK6mutants encompassing various domains in the left panel. The right panel shows the results of mammalian two-hybrid assays. The interaction was determined by measuring the luciferase activities of HEK 293 cells transiently transfected with PAK6 full-length and deletion mutants fused in-frame downstream of VP16 transactivation domain in a pACT vector and GAL4 DBD fused AR in a pBIND vector. Data represent the mean ± SEM (n = 3). *<i>p</i><0.05, compared to full-length PAK6, one-way ANOVA. (B) The left panel shows the schematic depiction of full-length AR and boundaries of AR truncated mutants encompassing various domains. A mammalian two-hybrid assay was performed by co-transfecting HEK-293cells with pACT-AR or truncated AR mutants, as indicated, with pBIND-PAK6 and pG5-Luc reporter construct. In both sets of experiment, a renilla luciferase reporter activity was used as a transfection internal control. The luciferase activity was normalized against the internal control and the vector basal control groups. Data represent the mean ± SEM (n = 3). *<i>p</i><0.05, compared to full-length AR, one-way ANOVA.</p

    Androgen-stimulated PAK6 activation promotes cell motility and invasion in LNCap cells stably transfected with tetracycline-inducible PAK6 vector (LNCap-tetON-PAK6).

    No full text
    <p>(A) Anti-PAK6 immuno-blot of tetracycline inducible PAK6 expression in two different clones of LNCap cells depicts the induction of PAK6 expression by doxycycline (1 μg/ml). (B) In vitro kinase activities of doxycycline-induced PAK6 kinase from individual clones using histone H4 as an exogenous substrate. (C) Androgen stimulation promotes transwell cell migration of doxycycline-induced LNCap-tetOn-PAK6 cells. Data represent the mean ± SEM. (n=6). **<i>p</i><0.01, ***<i>p</i><0.001 compared to their respective –DHT control; Student’s <i>t</i>-test. (D) Androgen stimulation promotes matrigel invasion of doxycycline-induced LNCap-tetON-PAK6 cells. All experiments were repeated at least three times, with consistent results. Data represent the mean ± SEM. (n=6). ***<i>p</i><0.001 compared to their respective –DHT control; Student’s <i>t</i>-test .</p

    Phosphorylation site mutants of PAK6-5A and PAK6-5E exhibit altered ability to interact with AR and androgen-stimulated kinase activation.

    No full text
    <p>(A) Interactions between AR and PAK6-5A, PAK6-5E are assessed by a mammalian two-hybrid assay. Full-length AR is cloned in-frame downstream of VP16 transactivation domain with a HA-tag using a pACT vector. PAK6-wt, -5A and 5E were cloned in-frame downstream of GAL4 DBD with a HA tag using a pBIND vector. A mammalian two-hybrid assay was performed by co-transfecting HEK-293cells with pACT-AR or AR truncated mutants, as indicated, with pBIND-PAK6 and pG5-Luc vector. Cells were treated with vehicle control or DHT (10 nM) for 20 h followed by dual luciferase assay. A renilla luciferase reporter activity was used as a transfection internal control. The luciferase activity was normalized by the internal control and the vector basal control groups. Data represent the mean ± SEM (n=3, *<i>p</i><0.01 compared to their respective vehicle controls; Student’s <i>t</i>-test). (B) A reciprocal immunoprecipitation assay was performed using AR and PAK6-WT, -5A and -5E mutants. HEK-293 cells were transfected with equal amount of AR and PAK6 expression vectors in the presence or absence of 10 nM DHT. Twenty hours post-transfection either AR or PAK6 was immunoprecipitated using antibodies specifically for either molecule then reciprocally probed by western blot for presence of co-precipitated interacting proteins as depicted. (C) A representative experiment of androgen-stimulated activation of PAK6-WT, PAK6-5A and PAK6-5E in an <i>in </i><i>vitro</i> kinase assay. The upper phosphorylation band is PAK6 autophosphorylation. The lower bands are the phosphorylation of the exogenous substrate histone H4. (D) Quantification of relative kinase activities of in vitro kinase assays from (C). Data represent the mean ± SEM (n=4, *<i>p</i><0.01 compared to their respective vehicle controls; Student’s <i>t</i>-test). </p

    Schematic diagram of PAK6 AR-binding domain phosphorylation site mutations.

    No full text
    <p>The AR-binding domain constitutive non-phosphorylation mutant PAK6-5A is generated by substituting three serine and two threonine residues with alanine (A). The AR-binding domain constitutive phosphorylation mimic mutant PAK6-5E is generated by substituting Serine/Threonine residues with glutamic acid (E).</p

    An Alternative Approach to ChIP-Seq Normalization Enables Detection of Genome-Wide Changes in Histone H3 Lysine 27 Trimethylation upon EZH2 Inhibition

    No full text
    <div><p>Chromatin immunoprecipitation and DNA sequencing (ChIP-seq) has been instrumental in inferring the roles of histone post-translational modifications in the regulation of transcription, chromatin compaction and other cellular processes that require modulation of chromatin structure. However, analysis of ChIP-seq data is challenging when the manipulation of a chromatin-modifying enzyme significantly affects global levels of histone post-translational modifications. For example, small molecule inhibition of the methyltransferase EZH2 reduces global levels of histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation (H3K27me3). However, standard ChIP-seq normalization and analysis methods fail to detect a decrease upon EZH2 inhibitor treatment. We overcome this challenge by employing an alternative normalization approach that is based on the addition of <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i> chromatin and a <i>D</i>. <i>melanogaster-</i>specific antibody into standard ChIP reactions. Specifically, the use of an antibody that exclusively recognizes the <i>D</i>. <i>melanogaster</i> histone variant H2Av enables precipitation of <i>D</i>. <i>melanogaster</i> chromatin as a minor fraction of the total ChIP DNA. The <i>D</i>. <i>melanogaster</i> ChIP-seq tags are used to normalize the human ChIP-seq data from DMSO and EZH2 inhibitor-treated samples. Employing this strategy, a substantial reduction in H3K27me3 signal is now observed in ChIP-seq data from EZH2 inhibitor treated samples.</p></div

    Reduced H3K27me3 binding is detected by ChIP-qPCR.

    No full text
    <p><b>(A)</b> ChIP was performed using chromatin from KARPAS-422 cells treated with the EZH2 inhibitor CPI-360. qPCR using the positive control primer <i>MYT1</i> showed reduced H3K27me3 occupancy in the presence of the inhibitor. <b>(B)</b> ChIP was performed using chromatin from PC9 cells treated with the EZH2 inhibitor GSK126. qPCR using the positive control primer <i>MYT1</i> showed reduced H3K27me3 occupancy in cells treated with the inhibitor. (<b>C</b>) Libraries were generated from KARPAS-422 cells using 15 cycles of PCR amplification. Library DNA was diluted and qPCR was performed using positive control primers for <i>MYT1</i> and <i>CCND2</i>. (<b>D</b>) Libraries were generated from PC9 cells as described in (C) and library DNA was used for qPCR using positive control primers for <i>MYT1</i> and <i>CCND2</i>. All experiments are represented as the mean of two independent experiments with qPCRs performed in triplicate ±SD. The <i>ACTB</i> promoter served as a negative control for all experiments.</p

    EZH2 inhibition reduces global H3K27me3 levels, however standard ChIP-seq methods do not reveal the reduction.

    No full text
    <p><b>(A)</b> Western blot showing reduced global H3K27me3 levels in KARPAS-422 cells treated with 1.5 μM CPI-360 for 4 and 8 days. Whole cell extracts were resolved by SDS page and immuno-blotted with anti-H3K27me3. Anti-H3 immuno-blots show equal levels of total H3. <b>(B)</b> Western blot showing reduced global H3K27me3 levels in PC9 cells treated with 1 μM of GSK126 for 5 days. Whole cell extracts were resolved by SDS page and immuno-blotted with anti-H3K27me3. Anti-H3 immuno-blots show equal levels of total H3. <b>(C, D)</b> Representation of H3K27me3 ChIP-seq data using IGV. No obvious differences are detected in CPI-360 (C) and GSK126 (D) treated KARPAS-422 and PC9 cells when compared to vehicle-treated controls. <b>(E, F)</b> Genome-wide data from H3K27me3 ChIP-seq experiments under different treatment conditions are represented as scatter plots.</p

    <i>D</i>. <i>melanogaster</i> tag counts from H3K27me3 ChIP-seq reactions are elevated in EZH2 inhibitor treated samples.

    No full text
    <p>H2Av bound regions of the <i>D</i>. <i>melanogaster</i> genome were determined using the H2Av antibody in ChIP-seq reactions containing <i>D</i>. <i>melanogaster</i> S2 or OSS chromatin. <i>D</i>. <i>melanogaster</i> tags from ChIP-seq spike-in reactions were mapped only to these pre-defined H2Av regions. <b>(A)</b> H3K27me3 ChIP-seq reactions with <i>D</i>. <i>melanogaster</i> spike-in in KARPAS-422 cells have a substantial increase in <i>D</i>. <i>melanogaster</i> tags in spike-in libraries prepared from CPI-360 treated cells both at 4 days and 8 days after treatment. <b>(B)</b> The increase was not observed in the control H3K9me3 reactions. <b>(C)</b> H3K27me3 ChIP-seq reactions with <i>D</i>. <i>melanogaster</i> spike-in in PC9 cells have a substantial increase in <i>D</i>. <i>melanogaster</i> tags in spike-in libraries prepared from GSK126 treated cells. <b>(D)</b> The substantial increase in tags was not observed in the control H3K4me3 ChIP-seq spike-in reactions.</p
    corecore