71 research outputs found
Vyresnio amžiaus žmonių apendicito ypatumai
Donatas Venskutonis1, Virmantas Daubaras1, Juozas Kutkevičius1, Jelena Kornej21 Kauno medicinos universiteto Bendrosios chirurgijos klinika, 2-oji Kauno klinikinė ligoninė2 Kauno medicinos universitetas
Įvadas / tikslas
Apendicitas yra viena iš dažniausių ūminių chirurginių pilvo ligų. Per gyvenimą ūminiu apendicitu suserga apie 7 % visos populiacijos. Literatūros duomenimis, ūminis apendicitas sudaro apie 5 % visų ūminių pilvo ligų vyresnio amžiaus grupėje. Šio darbo tikslas – išanalizuoti KMU Bendrosios chirurgijos klinikoje (II KKL) 1991–2000 metais gydytų vyresnio amžiaus žmonių apendicito formas, diagnostinio laikotarpio trukmę, bendrą gulėjimo stacionare laiką, komplikacijų ir baigčių aspektus, šiuos duomenis palyginti su jaunesnių kaip 65 metų ūminiu apendicitu sergančių ligonių grupe.
Metodai
Tyrimo metu retrospektyviai buvo išanalizuotos 1991–2000 m. gydytų nuo įvairių ūminio apendicito formų asmenų ligos istorijos, siekiant įvertinti ligos trukmę, diagnostinio laikotarpio trukmę, ligos formą, gulėjimo stacionare trukmę, komplikacijas, mirštamumą ir palyginti šiuos duomenis dviejų amžiaus grupių: iki 65 metų ir daugiau kaip 65 metų. Tiriant istorijas buvo kreipiamas dėmesys į diagnostinio laikotarpio trukmę iki operacijos, operacijos metu nustatytą apendicito formą, stacionarinio gydymo trukmę, buvusias komplikacijas ir baigtį.
Rezultatai
1991–2000 m. nuo įvairių ūminio apendicito formų iš viso buvo gydyti 2378 ligoniai: pirmoje grupėje (iki 65 m.) buvo 2220 ligonių (92,51 %), antroje – 158 ligoniai (7,49 %). Pirmos grupės operuota 2130 ligonių (95,94 %), antros – 145 ligoniai (91,7 %). Vertinant apendicito formas, antroje amžiaus grupėje buvo gerokai daugiau gangreninių perforacinių nei pirmoje grupėje (p = 0,0014), o šioje – daugiau flegmoninių (p < 0,0010). Pirmos grupės ligoniai iki operacijos ligoninėje gulėjo 2,3 val., antros – 4,11 val. (p < 0,05). Bendras gulėjimo laikas pirmos grupės ligonių buvo 6,77 paros, antros – 11,14 paros (p < 0,05).Pooperacinių komplikacijų pirmoje grupėje buvo 151 (7,1 %), antroje – 31 (21,3 %), (p = 0,0151). Mirštamumas antroje grupėje sudarė 3,4 %, pirmoje grupėje mirusių nebuvo.
Išvados
Vyresnio amžiaus žmonės serga sunkesnėmis apendicito formomis, jų ikioperacinis ir bendras gulėjimo laikas yra ilgesnis (skirtumas statistiškai patikimas), pooperacinės komplikacijos sunkesnės ir dažnesnės (skirtumas statistiškai patikimas), visi mirusieji buvo vyresnio amžiaus žmonės, sirgę sunkiomis perforacinio apendicito formomis.
Prasminiai žodžiai: apendicitas, vyresnio amžiaus ligoniai.
Appendicitis - peculiarities in elderly patients
Donatas Venskutonis1, Virmantas Daubaras1, Juozas Kutkevičius1, Jelena Kornej2
Background / objective
Appendicitis is one of the most prevailing acute surgical abdominal diseases. According to literature data, acute appendicitis makes 5% of all acute diseases among elderly patients. The aim is to analyse the forms of appendicitis among elderly patients treated in KMU General Surgery Clinic (II KKL) in 1991–2000, as well as the duration of the diagnostic period, general duration of patients’ stay in hospital, the aspects of complications and mortality as compared to those in patients under 65 years of age.
Methods
Medical histories of the patients treated for acute appendicitis in 1991–2000 were analysed retrospectively. The patients were divided into two age groups: group 1 – under 65 years of age; group 2 – older than 65. The following criteria were evaluated: form of the disease, duration of diagnostic period; duration of stay in hospital; complications, mortality. These data were compared in both age groups.
Results
In 1991–2000, a total of 2378 patients were treated for various forms of acute appendicitis. There were 2220 patients (91.1%) in group 1 and 158 (7.49%) in group 2. In group 1, 2130 patients (95.94%) and in group 2, 145 (91.7%) were operated on. In group 2 there were more gangrenous perforated acute appendicitis forms than in group 1 (p = 0.0014) and in group 1 there were more phlegmonic forms of appendicitis (p < 0.001). As to the time of stay in hospital before operation, in group 1 it was 2.3 h and in group 2 4.11 h (p < 0.05). The mean stay in hospital in group 1 was 6.77 days and in group 2 11.14 days (p < 0.05). The number of postoperative complications was 151 (7.1%) in group 1 and 31 (21.3 %) in group 2 (p = 0.0151). Mortality in group 2 was 3.4%, while in group 1 nobody died.
Conclusions
Elderly people fall ill with more grave forms of appendicitis; their stay in hospital before the operation and total stay in hospital is longer, the postoperative complications are more severe and more fequent; the differences are statistically reliable; all lethal cases were elderly patients ill with severe forms of perforated appendicitis.
Keywords: appendicitis, elderly patients
Heart Failure and Stroke.
PurposeIschemic stroke significantly contributes to morbidity and mortality in heart failure (HF). The risk of stroke increases significantly, with coexisting atrial fibrillation (AF). An aggravating factor could be asymptomatic paroxysms of AF (so-called silent AF), and therefore, the risk stratification in these patients remains difficult. This review provides an overview of stroke risk in HF, its risk stratification, and stroke prevention in these patients.Recent findingsStroke risk stratification in HF patients remains an important issue. Recently, the CHA2DS2-VASc score, originally developed to predict stroke risk in AF patients, had been reported to be a predictive for strokes in HF patients regardless of AF being present. Furthermore, there are several independent risk factors (e.g., hypertension, diabetes mellitus, prior stroke) described. Based on the current evidence, HF should be considered as an independent risk factor for stroke. The CHA2DS2-VASc score might be useful to predict stroke risk in HF patients with or without AF in clinical routine. However, there is only a recommendation for the oral anticoagulation use in patients with concomitant HF and AF, while in patients with HF and no AF, individualized risk stratification is preferred. Current guidelines recommend to prefer non-vitamin Kantagonist anticoagulants over warfarin
Impact of single versus double transseptal puncture on outcome and complications in pulmonary vein isolation procedures
Background: The aim of the current study was to analyze the impact of single versus double transseptal puncture (TSP) for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation.Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation were prospectively included in the AF ablation registry and were analyzed according to single versus double TSP.Results: A total of 478 patients (female 35%, persistent AF 67%) undergoing AF ablation between 01/2014 and 09/2014 were included. Single TSP was performed in 202 (42%) patients, double TSP in 276 (58%) patients. Age, gender, body mass index, CHA2DS2-VASc score, left ventricular ejection fraction and operator experience (experienced operator defined as ≥ 5 years of experience in invasive electrophysiology) were equally distributed between the two groups. Repeat procedures (re-dos) were more frequently performed using single TSP access (p < 0.001). Left atrial (LA) diameter was larger in patients with double TSP (p = 0.001). Procedure duration in single TSP was identical to double TSP procedures (p = 0.823). Radiation duration was similar between the two groups (p = 0.217). There were 49 (10%) patients with complications after catheter ablation. There were no differences between complication rates and TSP type (p = 0.555). Similarly, recurrence rates were comparable between both TSP groups (p = 0.788).Conclusions: There was no clear benefit of single or double TSP in AF ablation
Association between peripheral plasma markers and left atrial anatomy in patients with atrial fibrillation
Association Between Frailty and Atrial Fibrillation in Older Adults: The Framingham Heart Study Offspring Cohort
Background: Frailty is associated bidirectionally with cardiovascular disease. However, the relations between frailty and atrial fibrillation (AF) have not been fully elucidated.
Methods and Results: Using the FHS (Framingham Heart Study) Offspring cohort, we sought to examine both the association between frailty (2005-2008) and incident AF through 2016 and the association between prevalent AF and frailty status (2011-2014). Frailty was defined using the Fried phenotype. Models adjusted for age, sex, and smoking. Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for competing risk of death, assessed the association between prevalent frailty and incident AF. Logistic regression models assessed the association between prevalent AF and new-onset frailty. For the incident AF analysis, we included 2053 participants (56% women; mean age, 69.7+/-6.9 years). By Fried criteria, 1018 (50%) were robust, 903 (44%) were prefrail, and 132 (6%) were frail. In total, 306 incident cases of AF occurred during an average 9.2 (SD, 3.1) follow-up years. After adjustment, there was no statistically significant association between prevalent frailty status and incident AF (prefrail versus robust: hazard ratio [HR], 1.22 [95% CI, 0.95-1.55]; frail versus robust: HR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.57-1.47]). At follow-up, there were 111 new cases of frailty. After adjustment, there was no statistically significant association between prevalent AF and new-onset frailty (odds ratio, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.17-1.36]).
Conclusions: Although a bidirectional association between frailty and cardiovascular disease has been suggested, we did not find evidence of an association between frailty and AF. Our findings may be limited by sample size and should be further explored in other populations
Prediction of electro-anatomical substrate and arrhythmia recurrences using APPLE, DR-FLASH and MB-LATER scores in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation
Time-dependent prediction of arrhythmia recurrences during long-term follow-up in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: The Leipzig Heart Center AF Ablation Registry
The Role of Pro-Fibrotic Biomarkers in Atrial Fibrillation How Good Are We in the Translational Interpretation?
- …