8 research outputs found

    CD4 cell count (raw) plotted against the sum of Stanford scores for nucleoside and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors ( and , respectively).

    No full text
    <p>The upper limit of CD4 ( cells/mL) was truncated to cells/mL (omitting 19 outliers) to emphasize the overall trend. Because the predicted baseline CD4 tended to decline with both and , we combined the scores into a single ordinal variable to facilitate interpretation. The linear model prediction is displayed as a solid line (generated by fitting a smoothing spline to the predicted values with smoothing parameter ), with confidence intervals displayed as dashed lines.</p

    Coefficient estimates from Akaike Information Criterion (AIC)-selected linear models of baseline and plasma HIV RNA on Stanford scores by drug class and demographic and risk factors.

    No full text
    <p>All estimates were averaged over an ensemble of linear models using Akaike weights. Only statistically significant () terms after weighting are reported. Linear effects of factors were estimated relative to the model intercept, <i>i.e.</i>, a hypothetical female white individual. NS = not significant.</p

    Three-dimensional scatterplot of -transformed plasma viral load (pVL) as a function of Stanford scores for NRTI and NNRTIs ( and ).

    No full text
    <p>Overall, higher was associated with higher pVL, while was inversely associated with pVL. The range of pVL () was truncated to emphasize the overall trend (omitting 73 outliers). The linear model prediction is displayed as a wireframe surface (generated by local polynomial regression with smoothing parameter ).</p

    Box-and-whisker plots illustrating (A) the effects of SDRMs at positions D67 and K219 on CD4 cell count and (B) the effects of SDRMs at positions M184 and K103 on plasma viral load (pVL).

    No full text
    <p>‘Wildtype’ denotes sequences lacking SDRMs at both positions, irrespective of whether any other SDRMs were present at other positions in protease or RT. Solid lines indicate the group median and open circles denote outliers that fall outside the region defined by 1.5 times the interquartile range. Plot (A) was rescaled with respect to untransformed CD4 counts to emphasize differences among groups, trimming 4 outliers from the ‘wildtype’ group (1602, 1626, 1838, and 2073 cells/mL) from the plot region. Sample sizes per group are annotated on each plot.</p

    Coefficient estimates from AIC-selected linear models of baseline and plasma HIV RNA on position-specific SDRMs and demographic and risk factors.

    No full text
    <p>SDRMs are annotated by HXB2 reference residue and position (gene-specific numbering), followed by an ‘X’ to indicate a non-reference residue. Positions 46, 54, and 90 are in protease and all others are in reverse transcriptase. All estimates were averaged over an ensemble of linear models using Akaike weights. Only terms that were statistically significant () are reported here. NS = not significant.</p

    Unadjusted and stabilized weight-adjusted linear models of multinomial exposure variables (M184X and (K103X or K219X)) and (D67X and K219X) on plasma HIV RNA and , respectively.

    No full text
    <p>The model intercepts are taken to be by default, <i>i.e.</i>, none of the designated mutations are present; these estimates are unchanged in the adjusted model and are not repeated for clarity of presentation. Significant () effect estimates are bolded.</p

    Prevalence of transmitted surveillance drug resistance mutations (SDRMs) over time.

    No full text
    <p>Sampling years 1998–2002 were grouped into a single level (‘pre-2003’) to adjust for small sample sizes (, and , respectively). Sample sizes for the bins are displayed below the -axis. Dashes (<b>−</b>) indicate the fraction of naïve sequences in a given sampling period that contain at least one SDRM (right -axis). The trend in mean number of SDRMs per naïve sequence (left -axis) over time is displayed as a solid line annotated with the actual values. The quantile per time point is depicted by a lighter line bounding a shaded region to illustrate the trend in the distributions (all medians were zero).</p
    corecore