c-Src links a RANK/αvβ3 integrin complex to the osteoclast cytoskeleton

RANK ligand (RANKL), by mechanisms unknown, directly activates osteoclasts to resorb bone. Because c-Src is key to organizing the cell's cytoskeleton, we asked if the tyrosine kinase also mediates RANKL-stimulated osteoclast activity. RANKL induces c-Src to associate with RANK(369–373) in an αvβ3-dependent manner. Furthermore, RANK(369–373) is the only one of six putative TRAF binding motifs sufficient to generate actin rings and activate the same cytoskeleton-organizing proteins as the integrin. While c-Src organizes the cell's cytoskeleton in response to the cytokine, it does not participate in RANKL-stimulated osteoclast formation. Attesting to their collaboration, αvβ3 and activated RANK coprecipitate, but only in the presence of c-Src. c-Src binds activated RANK via its Src homology 2 (SH2) domain and αvβ3 via its SH3 domain, suggesting the kinase links the two receptors. Supporting this hypothesis, deletion or inactivating point mutation of either the c-Src SH2 or SH3 domain obviates the RANK/αvβ3 association. Thus, activated RANK prompts two distinct signaling pathways; one promotes osteoclast formation, and the other, in collaboration with c-Src-mediated linkage to αvβ3, organizes the cell's cytoskeleton

31st Annual Meeting and Associated Programs of the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC 2016) : part two

Background The immunological escape of tumors represents one of the main ob- stacles to the treatment of malignancies. The blockade of PD-1 or CTLA-4 receptors represented a milestone in the history of immunotherapy. However, immune checkpoint inhibitors seem to be effective in specific cohorts of patients. It has been proposed that their efficacy relies on the presence of an immunological response. Thus, we hypothesized that disruption of the PD-L1/PD-1 axis would synergize with our oncolytic vaccine platform PeptiCRAd. Methods We used murine B16OVA in vivo tumor models and flow cytometry analysis to investigate the immunological background. Results First, we found that high-burden B16OVA tumors were refractory to combination immunotherapy. However, with a more aggressive schedule, tumors with a lower burden were more susceptible to the combination of PeptiCRAd and PD-L1 blockade. The therapy signifi- cantly increased the median survival of mice (Fig. 7). Interestingly, the reduced growth of contralaterally injected B16F10 cells sug- gested the presence of a long lasting immunological memory also against non-targeted antigens. Concerning the functional state of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), we found that all the immune therapies would enhance the percentage of activated (PD-1pos TIM- 3neg) T lymphocytes and reduce the amount of exhausted (PD-1pos TIM-3pos) cells compared to placebo. As expected, we found that PeptiCRAd monotherapy could increase the number of antigen spe- cific CD8+ T cells compared to other treatments. However, only the combination with PD-L1 blockade could significantly increase the ra- tio between activated and exhausted pentamer positive cells (p= 0.0058), suggesting that by disrupting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis we could decrease the amount of dysfunctional antigen specific T cells. We ob- served that the anatomical location deeply influenced the state of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes. In fact, TIM-3 expression was in- creased by 2 fold on TILs compared to splenic and lymphoid T cells. In the CD8+ compartment, the expression of PD-1 on the surface seemed to be restricted to the tumor micro-environment, while CD4 + T cells had a high expression of PD-1 also in lymphoid organs. Interestingly, we found that the levels of PD-1 were significantly higher on CD8+ T cells than on CD4+ T cells into the tumor micro- environment (p < 0.0001). Conclusions In conclusion, we demonstrated that the efficacy of immune check- point inhibitors might be strongly enhanced by their combination with cancer vaccines. PeptiCRAd was able to increase the number of antigen-specific T cells and PD-L1 blockade prevented their exhaus- tion, resulting in long-lasting immunological memory and increased median survival

G-CSF potently inhibits osteoblast activity and CXCL12 mRNA expression in the bone marrow

Accumulating evidence indicates that interaction of stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF-1/CXCL12 [CXC motif, ligand 12]) with its cognate receptor, CXCR4 (CXC motif, receptor 4), generates signals that regulate hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) trafficking in the bone marrow. During granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)–induced HPC mobilization, CXCL12 protein expression in the bone marrow decreases. Herein, we show that in a series of transgenic mice carrying targeted mutations of their G-CSF receptor and displaying markedly different G-CSF–induced HPC mobilization responses, the decrease in bone marrow CXCL12 protein expression closely correlates with the degree of HPC mobilization. G-CSF treatment induced a decrease in bone marrow CXCL12 mRNA that closely mirrored the fall in CXCL12 protein. Cell sorting experiments showed that osteoblasts and to a lesser degree endothelial cells are the major sources of CXCL12 production in the bone marrow. Interestingly, osteoblast activity, as measured by histomorphometry and osteocalcin expression, is strongly down-regulated during G-CSF treatment. However, the G-CSF receptor is not expressed on osteoblasts; accordingly, G-CSF had no direct effect on osteoblast function. Collectively, these data suggest a model in which G-CSF, through an indirect mechanism, potently inhibits osteoblast activity resulting in decreased CXCL12 expression in the bone marrow. The consequent attenuation of CXCR4 signaling ultimately leads to HPC mobilization