224,053 research outputs found

    Neologistic jargon aphasia and agraphia in primary progressive aphasia

    Get PDF
    The terms 'jargon aphasia' and 'jargon agraphia' describe the production of incomprehensible language containing frequent phonological, semantic or neologistic errors in speech and writing, respectively. Here we describe two patients with primary progressive aphasia (PPA) who produced neologistic jargon either in speech or writing. We suggest that involvement of the posterior superior temporal-inferior parietal region may lead to a disconnection between stored lexical representations and language output pathways leading to aberrant activation of phonemes in neologistic jargon. Parietal lobe involvement is relatively unusual in PPA, perhaps accounting for the comparative rarity of jargon early in the course of these diseases. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved

    High-low frequency slaving and regularity issues in the 3D Navier-Stokes equations

    Get PDF
    The old idea that an infinite dimensional dynamical system may have its high modes or frequencies slaved to low modes or frequencies is re-visited in the context of the 3D3D Navier-Stokes equations. A set of dimensionless frequencies {Ω~m(t)}\{\tilde{\Omega}_{m}(t)\} are used which are based on L2mL^{2m}-norms of the vorticity. To avoid using derivatives a closure is assumed that suggests that the Ω~m\tilde{\Omega}_{m} (m>1m>1) are slaved to Ω~1\tilde{\Omega}_{1} (the global enstrophy) in the form Ω~m=Ω~1Fm(Ω~1)\tilde{\Omega}_{m} = \tilde{\Omega}_{1}\mathcal{F}_{m}(\tilde{\Omega}_{1}). This is shaped by the constraint of two H\"older inequalities and a time average from which emerges a form for Fm\mathcal{F}_{m} which has been observed in previous numerical Navier-Stokes and MHD simulations. When written as a phase plane in a scaled form, this relation is parametrized by a set of functions 1λm(τ)41 \leq \lambda_{m}(\tau) \leq 4, where curves of constant λm\lambda_{m} form the boundaries between tongue-shaped regions. In regions where 2.5λm42.5 \leq \lambda_{m} \leq 4 and 1λm21 \leq \lambda_{m} \leq 2 the Navier-Stokes equations are shown to be regular\,: numerical simulations appear to lie in the latter region. Only in the central region 2<λm<2.52 < \lambda_{m} < 2.5 has no proof of regularity been found.Comment: 10 pages; 2 figure

    The logic of p-values

    Get PDF
    Wagenmakers et al. addressed the illogic use of p-values in 'Psychological Science under Scrutiny'. While historical criticisms mostly deal with the illogical nature of null hypothesis significance testing (NHST), Wagenmakers et al. generalize such argumentation to the p-value itself. Unfortunately, Wagenmakers et al. misinterpret the formal logic basis of tests of significance (and, by extension, of tests of acceptance). This article highlights three instances where such logical interpretation fails and provides plausible corrections and further clarification

    The dome: An unexpectedly simple failure of determinism

    Get PDF
    Newton's equations of motion tell us that a mass at rest at the apex of a dome with the shape specified here can spontaneously move. It has been suggested that this indeterminism should be discounted since it draws on an incomplete rendering of Newtonian physics, or it is "unphysical," or it employs illicit idealizations. I analyze and reject each of these reasons. Copyright 2008 by the Philosophy of Science Association. All rights reserved

    The ‘Goodwork Plan’ is here : is it good enough?

    Get PDF

    Flow on links: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow

    Get PDF

    There are no universal rules for induction

    Get PDF
    In a material theory of induction, inductive inferences are warranted by facts that prevail locally. This approach, it is urged, is preferable to formal theories of induction in which the good inductive inferences are delineated as those conforming to universal schemas. An inductive inference problem concerning indeterministic, nonprobabilistic systems in physics is posed, and it is argued that Bayesians cannot responsibly analyze it, thereby demonstrating that the probability calculus is not the universal logic of induction. Copyright 2010 by the Philosophy of Science Association.All right reserved
    corecore