7 research outputs found

    Corticosteroid Administration to Prevent Complications of Anterior Cervical Spine Fusion: A Systematic Review.

    Get PDF
    Study Design: Systematic review. Objectives: Anterior cervical approach is associated with complications such as dysphagia and airway compromise. In this study, we aimed to systematically review the literature on the efficacy and safety of corticosteroid administration as a preventive measure of such complications in anterior cervical spine surgery with fusion. Methods: Following a systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases in July 2016, all comparative human studies that evaluated the effect of steroids for prevention of complications in anterior cervical spine surgery with fusion were included, irrespective of number of levels and language. Risk of bias was assessed using MINORS (Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies) checklist and Cochrane Back and Neck group recommendations, for nonrandomized and randomized studies, respectively. Results: Our search yielded 556 articles, of which 9 studies (7 randomized controlled trials and 2 non-randomized controlled trials) were included in the final review. Dysphagia was the most commonly evaluated complication, and in most studies, its severity or incidence was significantly lower in the steroid group. Although prevertebral soft tissue swelling was less commonly assessed, the results were generally in favor of steroid use. The evidence for airway compromise and length of hospitalization was inconclusive. Steroid-related complications were rare, and in both studies that evaluated the fusion rate, it was comparable between steroid and control groups in long-term follow-up. Conclusions: Current literature supports the use of steroids for prevention of complications in anterior cervical spine surgery with fusion. However, evidence is limited by substantial risk of bias and small number of studies reporting key outcomes

    Neurologic Involvement in Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis: A Comparative Study

    No full text
    Objective: The aim of this study was to describe the presentation and outcomes of patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) presenting with neurologic involvement according to ACR criteria. Methods: Consecutive newly diagnosed GPA patients who had undergone follow-up for at least six months between 2013 and 2018 at Amir-A’lam hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Patients were divided into two groups: those with nervous system involvement at either disease diagnosis or follow-up (89 patients) and those without neurological symptoms until the last follow-up (131 patients). From all patients reviewed in this study, 68 (30.9%) patients died during the follow-up period. Among the deceased patients, 18 (20.2%) were in the non-neurologic group, and 50 (38.2%) were in the neurologic group. The median (IQR) of BVAS in 220 patients was 11.0 (18.0-8.0) in total: 10.0 (14.5-7.50) and 12.0 (21.0-8.0) in the non-neurologic and the neurologic groups, respectively. The score of BVAS in the neurologic group was significantly higher than in the non-neurologic group (p = 0.039). Of 131 patients, sensory neuropathy was found in 99 patients (75.5%). In total, 95 patients (72.5%) complained of hearing loss, which was diagnosed as sensory–neural hearing loss; 27 patients (20.6%) complained of headache; 13 (9.9%) had a history of cerebrovascular events; 5 (3.8%) had an episode of seizure or loss of consciousness (LOC); and 3 (2.3%) had mononeuritis multiplex. Two patients (1.5%) were diagnosed with meningitis and two (1.7%) with encephalitis. Conclusion: According to this study, neurological symptoms are an undeniable part of the disease course for GPA patients, and these symptoms are associated with disease severity, prognosis, and response to treatment

    Incidence of traumatic spinal cord injury worldwide: A systematic review, data integration, and update

    No full text
    Objectives: This review was designed to update our earlier systematic review which evaluated both published and unpublished evidence on the incidence of traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) worldwide. Methods: We used various search methods including strategic searching, reference checking, searching for grey literature, contacting registries, authors, and organizations requesting unpublished data, browsing related websites, and hand searching key journals. The quality of included studies was evaluated by Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools. Records published between April 2013 and May 2020 were added to the original systematic review. Results: Overall, 58 resources including 45 papers, 10 SCI registry reports, 1 book, and 2 theses were retrieved. We found TSCI incidence data for eight new countries, which overall shapes our knowledge of TSCI incidence for 49 countries. The incidence of TSCI ranges from 3.3 to 195.4 cases per million (cpm) based on subnational studies and from 5.1 to 150.48 cpm based on national studies. Most of the studies were low quality, lacked consistent case selection due to unclear definition of TSCI and unclear ascertainment methods. Conclusions: There is an increasing number of publications in the literature focusing on the epidemiologic data of TSCI. The absence of a standard form of reporting TSCI hinders the comparability of data across different data sources. Use of various definitions for TSCI may lead to heterogeneity in reports. Use of sensitivity analyses based on reasonable classification criteria can aid in offering a uniform set of case identification and ascertainment criteria for TSCI

    Adopting Clinical Practice Guidelines for Pharmacologic Management of Acute Spinal Cord Injury from a Developed World Context to a Developing Global Region

    Get PDF
    Background: Proper utilization of high-quality clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) eliminates the dependence of patients\u27 outcomes on the ability and knowledge of individual health care providers and reduces unwarranted variation in care. The aim of this study was to adapt/adopt two CPGs for pharmacologic management of acute spinal cord injury (SCI) using guideline adaptation methods. Methods: This study was conducted based on the ADAPTE process. Following establishment of an organizing committee and choosing the health topics, we appraised the quality of the CPGs using the Appraisal of Clinical Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II). Then, the authors extracted and categorized suggestions according to Population, Intervention, Professions, Outcomes and Health care setting (PIPOH). The decision-making process was based on systemic evaluation of each suggestion, utilizing a combination of AGREE II scores, the quality of supporting evidence for or against each suggestion and the triad of feasibility, acceptance and adoptability for the Iranian health-care context. Results: Two guidelines were included in the adaptation process. Based on high-quality of these guidelines and the feasibility and adoptability evaluation of the organizing committee, we decided to adopt the suggestion of both guidelines. Overall, seven suggestions were extracted from the source guidelines. Conclusion: This work provides a framework to apply guidelines for acute SCI to the developing regions of the world. Attempts should be made to implement these suggestions in order to improve the health outcomes of Iranian SCI patients

    Quality of in-hospital care in traumatic spinal column and cord injuries (TSC/SCI) in I.R Iran

    No full text
    PURPOSE: This study aimed to implement the Quality of Care (QoC) Assessment Tool from the National Spinal Cord/Column Injury Registry of Iran (NSCIR-IR) to map the current state of in-hospital QoC of individuals with Traumatic Spinal Column and Cord Injuries (TSCCI).METHODS: The QoC Assessment Tool, developed from a scoping review of the literature, was implemented in NSCIR-IR. We collected the required data from two primary sources. Questions regarding health system structures and care processes were completed by the registrar nurse reviewing the hospital records. Questions regarding patient outcomes were gathered through patient interviews.RESULTS: We registered 2812 patients with TSCCI over six years from eight referral hospitals in NSCIR-IR. The median length of stay in the general hospital and intensive care unit was four and five days, respectively. During hospitalization 4.2% of patients developed pressure ulcers, 83.5% of patients reported satisfactory pain control and none had symptomatic urinary tract infections. 100%, 80%, and 90% of SCI registration centers had 24/7 access to CT scans, MRI scans, and operating rooms, respectively. Only 18.8% of patients who needed surgery underwent a surgical operation in the first 24 h after admission. In-hospital mortality rate for patients with SCI was 19.3%.CONCLUSION: Our study showed that the current in-hospital care of our patients with TSCCI is acceptable in terms of pain control, structure and length of stay and poor regarding in-hospital mortality rate and timeliness. We must continue to work on lowering rates of pressure sores, as well as delays in decompression surgery and fatalities.</p

    Supplemental Material - Pre-Hospital and Post-Hospital Quality of Care in Traumatic Spinal Column and Cord Injuries in Iran

    No full text
    Supplemental Material for Pre-Hospital and Post-Hospital Quality of Care in Traumatic Spinal Column and Cord Injuries in Iran by Arman Zeinaddini-Meymand, Vali Baigi, Mehdi Mousavi-Nasab, Sina Shool, Mohsen Sadeghi-Naini, Zahra Azadmanjir, Seyed Behnam Jazayeri, Samuel Berchi Kankam, Mohammad Dashtkoohi, Aidin Shakeri, Esmail Fakharian, Leila Kouchakinejad-Eramsadati, Habibollah Pirnejad, Homayoun Sadeghi-Bazargani, Laleh Bagheri, Yasaman Pourandish, Malihe Amiri, Ahmad Pour-Rashidi, James Harrop, and Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar in Global Spine Journal</p
    corecore