19 research outputs found

    Status in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma not otherwise specified: A single center study from Argentina

    Get PDF
    BackgroundDiffuse large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) is a heterogeneous disease. Based on Hans? algorithm, DLBCL not otherwise specified (NOS) is classified by cell-of-origin into germinal center B-cell (GCB) and non-GCB subtypes. Non-GCB ones have frequently NF-kB pathway activation and worse prognosis compared to GCB cases. MYD88 is an adaptor protein of toll-like and IL-1 receptor signalling, leading downstream NF-kB pathway activation. MYD88 L265P mutation confers the protein constitutional activation. This mutation is present in around 20% of non-GCB subtype, and rarely found in GCB subtype of DLBCL. The prognostic value of MYD88 L265P mutation in DLBCL has been matter of controversy.AimsThe aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of MYD88 L265P mutation in DLBCL NOS cases of Argentina, and compare it with previous reports in the literature.MethodsA retrospective cohort of 73 DLBCL NOS cases diagnosed in the Italian Hospital of Buenos Aires (Argentina) between 2010 and 2016 was studied. Complete clinical records, Hans? algorithm, and available material for molecular testing were inclusion criteria. Patients with prior diagnosis of low-grade lymphoma or diagnosis of immunodeficiency-associated, post-transplant, EBV+, primary mediastinal, primary testicular, primary CNS, primary effusion, leg-type or intravascular DLBCL were excluded. DNA was extracted from tissue blocks using QIAamp mini kit (Qiagen). MYD88 L265P was assessed using an in-house allele-specific probe-based Real-Time PCR assay. Positive (primary testicular DLBCL) and negative controls (tonsil) were added to each run. Every case was checked subsequently using qBiomarker MYD88 L265P Somatic Mutation Assay (Qiagen). Prevalences were expressed as percentage, confident intervals were calculated using Clopper-Pearson exact method. Kaplan Meier curves and Log-rank test were used to evaluate overall survival (OS).Results36 patients (49,31%) were female, and median age at diagnosis was 66 years (range 26-89). 33 patients (45,20%) had extranodal involvement (gastrointestinal tract: 14 cases; liver: 5 cases; bone: 4 cases; other locations: 10 cases). 44 cases (60,27%) were GCB and 29 (39,73%) were non-GCB DLBCLs. MYD88 L265P mutation was present in 2 cases (2,74% ; CI 95%: 0,33-9,55%) among all DLBCLs, including 1 GCB case (2,27% ; CI 95%: 0,06-12,02%) and 1 non-GCB case (3,45% ; CI 95%: 0,09-17.76%). There was no significant association between MYD88 L265P status, Hans´algorithm subtype, sex, age or Ki67 index and OS.ConclusionIn the analyzed population, the prevalence of GCB and non-GCB subtypes among DLBCL NOS cases was similar to international reports, although we did not find significant difference between both groups regarding OS (p=0,712). MYD88 L265P mutation was found only in 2 patients (1 GCB and 1 non-GCB), accounting for 2,74% (CI 95%: 0,33-9,55%) and 2,27% (CI 95%: 0,06-12,02%) of all DLBCL NOS and non-GCB cases, respectively. Both prevalences are significantly lower than those published in 2017 by Lee et al. in a meta-analysis, where they found that MYD88 L265P is present in 16% (CI 95%: 15-18,09%) and 20,63% (CI 95%: 18,41-23%) of patients among all DLBCLs and non-GCB subtype, respectively. However, MYD88 L265P prevalence in primary SNC, testicular and leg-type DLBCLs diagnosed in our institution are similar to the literature (data not shown).Fil: Jauk, Federico. Hospital Italiano; ArgentinaFil: Kohan, Dana. Hospital Italiano; ArgentinaFil: Ortega, Leandro Ismael. Hospital Italiano; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Diaz de Arce, Heidy. Hospital Italiano; ArgentinaFil: Cristaldo, Nancy. Hospital Italiano; ArgentinaFil: RANUNCOLO, Stella Maris. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas. Oficina de Coordinacion Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional E Ingenieria Biomedica. - Hospital Italiano. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional E Ingenieria Biomedica. - Instituto Universitario Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires. Instituto de Medicina Traslacional E Ingenieria Biomedica.; ArgentinaFil: Warley, Fernando. Hospital Italiano; ArgentinaFil: Otero, Victoria. Hospital Italiano; ArgentinaFil: Garcia Rivello, Hernan Jorge. Hospital Italiano; Argentina24th Congress of the European Hematology AssociationAmsterdamHolandaEscuela Europea de Hematologí

    Risk Factors for Postcesarean Maternal Infection in a Trial of Extended-Spectrum Antibiotic Prophylaxis

    Get PDF
    To identify maternal clinical risk factors for postcesarean maternal infection in a randomized clinical trial of preincision extended-spectrum antibiotic prophylaxis

    Is low-dose aspirin therapy to prevent preeclampsia more efficacious in non-obese women or when initiated early in pregnancy?

    No full text
    <div><p></p><p><i>Objective</i>: Late timing of intervention and maternal obesity are potential explanations for the modest effect of aspirin for preeclampsia prevention. We explored whether low-dose aspirin (LDA) is more effective in women at increased risk when initiated before 16 weeks' gestation or given to non-obese women.</p><p><i>Methods</i>: Secondary analysis of a trial to evaluate LDA (60 mg/d) for preeclampsia prevention in high-risk women. Participants were randomized to LDA or placebo between 13 and 26 weeks. We stratified the effect of LDA on preeclampsia by (a) timing of randomization (< 16 or ≥ 16 weeks gestation) and (b) body mass index (BMI) class (non-obese and obese). The Breslow–Day test for homogeneity was used to assess for variations in effect of LDA across gestational age and BMI groups.</p><p><i>Results</i>: Of 2503 women, 461 (18.4%) initiated LDA < 16 weeks. LDA effect was not better when initiated < 16 weeks (RR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.67–1.31) versus ≥ 16 weeks (RR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.75–1.08), (<i>p</i> value for interaction = 0.87). Similarly, LDA effect was not better in non-obese (RR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.7–1.13) versus obese women (RR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.7–1.13), (<i>p</i> value for interaction = 0.85).</p><p><i>Conclusion</i>: LDA for preeclampsia prevention was not more effective when initiated < 16 weeks or used in non-obese women at risk for preeclampsia. No particular subgroup of women was more or less likely to benefit from LDA therapy.</p></div

    HIV Status and Other Risk Factors for Prevalent and Incident Sexually Transmitted Infection during Pregnancy (2000-2014)

    No full text
    Background. Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are associated with adverse birth outcomes. Current prenatal STI screening guidelines define “risk” without explicit consideration of HIV status. Our objective was to test the hypothesis that HIV status is associated with bacterial STI in pregnant women. Methods. We designed a retrospective cohort study to identify pregnant women with HIV who delivered at our facility during 2000-2014. HIV+ women were compared to HIV- women with matching by year of delivery. Logistic regression was used to model adjusted odds of prevalent and incident STI. Prevalent STI was defined as chlamydia (CT), gonorrhea (GC), syphilis, or trichomoniasis detected on an initial prenatal screening test and incident STI as a newly positive result following a negative prenatal test. Results. The cohort included 432 women, 210 HIV+ and 222 HIV-. Most pregnant women were screened for STI (92% of HIV+ women and 74% of HIV- women). STI rates were high and particularly elevated in HIV+ women: 29% vs 18% (p=0.02), for prevalent STI and 11% vs 2% (p<0.001) for incident STI. Risk factors for prevalent STI were as follows: HIV status (aOR 3.0, CI: 1.4-6.4), Black race (aOR 2.7, 95% CI: 1.1-6.6), and more recent delivery (2007-2014 compared to 2000-2006) (aOR 2.3, CI: 1.1-4.7). HIV status was an independent risk factor for incident STI (aOR 7.2, CI: 2.1-25.0). Conclusion. Pregnant women who delivered in our center had high STI rates. Since HIV infection was independently associated with prevalent and incident STI, prenatal screening guidelines may need to incorporate HIV status as a high-risk group for repeat testing
    corecore