9 research outputs found
Equipment costs.
No full text1<p>As bought in December 2009.</p>2<p>The videos are available free of charge from corresponding author so this cost would not need to be replicated if same service was to be implemented elsewhere.</p>3<p>Supplied by Misco.</p>4<p>Supplied by RDP Health.</p
Staff attitudes and experiences of RAPID project.
No full text<p>Staff attitudes and experiences of RAPID project.</p
Characteristics of eligible patients admitted to AAU during pilot.
No full text*<p>As defined in National Guidelines on HIV testing <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0035212#pone.0035212-BritishHIV1" target="_blank">[9]</a>.</p
Reporting of HIV risk factors by gender (n = 147).
No full text<p>Reporting of HIV risk factors by gender (n = 147).</p
Outcome to bedside approach.
No full text1<p>Ward staff provided information on who should not be approached due to ill health on daily basis.</p>2<p>Usually due to intoxication or psychiatric illness.</p>3<p>Includes relatives or friends visiting, eating, language barriers and with staff.</p>4<p>HIV test already performed during current admission.</p
Cost estimates for first 1000 patients.
No full text1<p>Costs including qualifications. Taken from ‘Unit Costs of Health & Social Care 2010’ <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0035212#pone.0035212-Curtis1" target="_blank">[11]</a>.</p>2<p>Refer to <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0035212#pone-0035212-t005" target="_blank">table 5</a>. Most equipment would be expected to last well beyond the first 1000 patients so future costs would reduce accordingly.</p>3<p>Would require either simultaneous use of two laptops (parallel testing) or not including patient survey (collection of data on patient demographics, risk profile, acceptability). If parallel testing need to add further £1335.72 to start up costs (for second work station).</p
