4 research outputs found
Limited access to land rights for the powerless in Potchefstroom
The concept of structural violence is useful in the analysis of the land issue in urban areas in South Africa, more specifically in this case, the town of Potchefstroom from 1901 to 1952. By institutionalising racism, a situation of inequality of power and opportunities has been brought about. This can best be understood within the rigidly stratified system of apartheid: it imposed an alternative and restricted structure of land use on the specific subordinate category in the area of study. By creating this alternative system, those in power excluded the powerless from the "central" system. The concept of an alternative system can be understood in terms of the theory of structural violence, to explain the difference between the real and the potential attainment of human somatic and psychical abilities. Thus, structural violence is built into the very structures of a society and is concretized in unequal power and, consequently, unequal opportunities in life. Clearly, group and institutional discrimination in this area can be viewed as a form of structural violence because of the dire consequences, the indirect methods and the impersonal nature of these actions
A struggle for tenure by the "servant class" of Potchefstroom : a study in structural violence
The "servant class" of Potchefstroom intermittently struggled for some measure of security of the right of occupation and the use of urban land. They first relied entirely on the favour of their masters, then seemingly acquired long-term tenure in a native location. However, they were eventually consigned to the mass category of "urban natives" without tenure, initially under British rule after 1903. When accompanying their white masters on their trek from the Eastern Cape, they were never considered citizens of the republic that was to be constituted in the interior or as having any claim to land in town. Thus they lived with their masters on their burgerreg erwe (civil right stands) until 1888, when a native location was created for them, availing them with some basis for claiming security of tenure in an alternative system. However, partly because their claims of security of tenure were contentious when the location was planned and then established, a legal battle ensued between location residents and the local white authority after the South African War. This clash necessitated the appointment of the Feetham Commission in 1905 and the Armstrong Commission in 1907. These two commissions established certain limited and temporary benefits for location residents in Potchefstroom, partly based on their claims as very early residents of the town. This article covers an early and significant instance of the resistance of the "servant class" in southern Africa to the overarching, harsh social and legal structure in which the legitimacy of their tenure of urban land was ruled out.Die "dienskneg-klas" in Potchefstroom het vir onderbroke tye 'n stryd gevoer om 'n mate van sekuriteit vir die gebruik of selfs net die besetting van dorpsgrond. Eers was hulle slegs aangewese op die goeie guns van hulle meesters, daarna het hulle reg in die lokasie op die oog af verbeter, om net daarna deel te hĂȘ aan die lot van alle inwoners van lokasies onder aanvanklike Britse beheer na 1903. Alhoewel hulle hul wit meesters vanuit die Oos-Kaap vergesel het, is hulle nooit as burgers gereken van die republieke wat in die binneland tot stand sou kom nie, en waardeur hulle 'n reg tot dorpsgrond kon bekom nie. Daarom het hulle saam met hul meesters op burgerreg-erwe gewoon tot in 1888, toe 'n lokasie vir hulle tot stand gebring is binne 'n alternatiewe stelsel wat hulle gemeen het aan hulle 'n basis vir bedinging gegee het. Die omstredenheid met betrekking tot die omstandighede waaronder die lokasie gestig is, en wat hulle as reverdiging vir hulle verwagtings beskou het, en die latere teenoorstaande eise, het die aanwysing genoodsaak van die Feetham-kommisie in 1905 en die Armstrong-kommissie in 1907. Hierdie artikel hanteer 'n vroĂ«e en betekenisvolle geval van die weerstand van die "dienskneg-klas" in suider-Afrika teen 'n oorkoepelende en kras sosiale en regstruktuur waarin die legitimiteit tot die gebruik van stedelike grond uitgesluit was.http://www.journals.co.za/ej/ejour_hist.htmlam201
Protest by Potchefstroom native locationâs residents against dominance, 1904 to 1950
This article indicates the importance of a thorough study of local sources on protest action
by township residents in Makweteng (earlier known as Potchefstroomâs native location)
against oppressive laws and policies in South Africa. Although the term âgrassroots supportâ
only became a common one much later in South Africaâs history, the study of local
documents indicates the protracted broad swell of dissatisfaction among black South
African citizens against legalised segregation and later apartheid. In the case of some
individuals and local organisations these views articulated with protests on a national level.
This article covers the period 1904 to 1950 and looks at the strenuous efforts by white
authorities to dominate this township on a municipal level; the limited influence of the
native advisory bodies and localised national organisations in resisting this control; and the
singular abilities and contributions of Lazarus R. Muthle and James Z. Mdatyulwa in
Potchefstroomâs protests. It also indicates how this protest gradually helped to build the
basis for encompassing resistance, including resistance of an intellectual nature, in the 1970s
and 1980s.Hierdie artikel dui op die belang van ân grondige studie van plaaslike bronne in verband met
protes en weerstand van ân township (vroeĂ«r, Potchefstroomse naturelle-lokasie) se
inwoners teen onderdrukkende wetgewing en behandeling in Suid-Afrika. Alhoewel die
term âgrassroots supportâ (voetsoolvlak-steun) eers heelwat later in die Suid-Afrikaanse
geskiedenis ân algemene term geword het; dui die studie van plaaslike dokumente op die
uitgerekte en wye golf van ontevredenheid onder swart Suid-Afrikaanse burgers teen
wetlike segregasie en later apartheid; en hoe, in die geval van sekere individue en plaaslike
organisasies, hierdie sienings geartikuleer het met protes op nasionale vlak. Die artikel dek
die enorme pogings van die wit munisipale owerhede om die lokasie te domineer, die uiters
beperkte invloed van die naturelle-adviesrade en ook gelokaliseerde nasionale organisasies
om hierdie beheer te weerstaan, die uitsonderlike vermoëns en bydraes van Lazarus R.
Muthle en James Z. Mdatyulwa in Potchefstroomse protes en hoe, deur hulle optrede op plaaslike vlak, en te midde van hul wisselvallige verblyfreg, hierdie protes geleidelik bygedra
het tot die onderbou van omvattende weerstand, insluitende diĂ© van ân intellektuele aard in
die 1970s en 1980s.http://www.journals.co.za/ej/ejour_hist.htmlcp201
Remaining at the margins : case study of farm workers in the North West Province, South Africa
This article explores living conditions, livelihoods and prospects of farmworkers with regard to
land reform legislation. Research was conducted from 2004 to 2010 on four farms in the North
West Province, interviewing farmworkers and farm owners. Representatives of the agricultural
union Agri North West and land analysts were interviewed to obtain their perspective on farm
labour. Despite protective legislation, farmworkersâ living and working conditions have
deteriorated. Farmworkers further lack alternative livelihood options, perpetuating their
dependency on farm owners, who are the only ones providing services and some social security.
Among the main barriers in the empowerment of farmworkers are limited insights regarding
complex social relationships on farms, the challenge to address the specificity of power
relations, and the marginalised position of farmworkers and their lack of agency in the broader
political system. Both farmworkers and farm owners need support structures and strengthened
institutional capacity to gradually change power dynamics.German Research Foundation (DFG), the National Research Foundation, South Africa and the Belgian non-governmental organisation Nutrition Third World.http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cdsa202016-03-05hb201