307 research outputs found
Linda Tuhiwai Smith: Decolonizing Methodologies ā Research and Indigenous Peoples
Glavna tema knjige je propitivanje znaÄenja znanstvenog istraživanja s pozicije Drugog. U ovom sluÄaju Drugi su starosjedilaÄki, kolonizirani narodi, a znanstvenoistraživanje koje se propituje je ono koje je definirala zapadna znanost
CYBERFEMINISMUS ZWISCHEN THEORIE UND BEWEGUNG. EIN RĆCKBLICK AUF KROATIEN
Prva je polovica 90-tih bila obilježena teorijskim utemeljenjem cyberfeminizma kao nove feministiÄke paradigme, koja se razvijala u dvije podvarijante: 1) meki cyberfeminizam predstavnice kojeg su zastupale tezu da su i nove tehnologije, poput veÄine āstarihā u osnovi muÅ”ka oruÄa koja perpetuiraju stare odnose dominacije i iskljuÄivanja, te ih žene moraju preuzeti i radikalno dekonstruirati i 2) tvrdi cyberfeminizam koji pokuÅ”ava ukazati na fundamentalnu ženskost novih tehnologija, a vjerovanje da je tehnologija āmuÅ”ka stvarā proglaÅ”ava patrijarhalnim mitom. Druga polovica 90-tih bila je obilježena Å”irenjem pokreta iz virtualne u fiziÄku sferu, nastankom prvih cyberfeministiÄkih grupa i organiziranjem CyberfeministiÄkih internacionala koje su okupile najznaÄajnije medijske teoretiÄarke, umjetnice i aktivistice iz cijelog svijeta. Sama Äinjenica aktivnog koriÅ”tenja novih tehnologija svjedoÄi da su žene djelatno prevladale rodnu obilježenost ICT-a kao esencijalno āmuÅ”ke igraÄkeā, da su prevladale strah, te pokazale sposobnost da kreativno i prema vlastitim potrebama pune kiberprostor vlastitim sadržajima. Tijekom tog razdoblja unatoÄ ratu/ratovima u bivÅ”oj Jugoslaviji, i u Hrvatskoj nastaju dva projekta, elektroniÄka konferencija Zamir/women i edukativni projekt ElektroniÄke vjeÅ”tice, koji po svojoj suÅ”tini predstavljaju prve primjere cyberfeministiÄkih praksi u regiji.The beginning of 1990s was marked by theoretical establishment of cyberfeminism as the new feminist paradigm, which developed into two versions: 1) soft cyberfeminism whose representatives argued that new technologies, as most āoldā ones, are also in the hands of men, perpetrating the old relations of dominance and exclusion, and therefore women need to take them over and radically deconstruct; and 2) hard cyberfeminism which tries to point to fundamental femininity of new technologies, and declares that technology as āa manās thingā is a patriarchal myth. Second half of 1990s was marked by the spreading of the movement from virtual into physical sphere, appearance of first cyberfeminist groups and organization of Cyberfeminist Internationals that gather most significant media theorists, artists and activists from around the world. The very fact that women actively use new technologies is evidence that they have actively overcome the gender implications of ICTs as essentially āmale toysā, that they have overcome their fear, and exhibited ability to creatively, and according to their own needs, fill cyberspace with their own content. During this period, despite the war in former Yugoslavia, two projects appear in Croatia: electronic conference Zamir/women and educational project Electronic witches, both of which are the first examples of cyberfeminist practice in the region.Die erste HƤlfte der neunziger Jahre war durch ein neues feministisches Paradigma gekennzeichnet, nƤmlich durch die theoretische BegrĆ¼ndung des Cyberfeminismus, die sich in zwei Untervarianten entwickelt hat: 1. Sanfter Cyberfeminismus, dessen Verfechterinnen die These vertreten, dass auch neue Technologien, genauso wie die alten, im Grunde genommen mƤnnliche Waffen sind, die die alten VerhƤltnisse der Herrschaft und des Ausschlusses aufrechterhalten, und dass Frauen sie Ć¼bernehmen und radikal dekonstruieren mĆ¼ssen; 2. Harter Cyberfeminismus, der versucht auf die fundamentale Weiblichkeit von neuen Technologien hinzuweisen, und die Idee, dass Technologie āMƤnnersacheā ist, einen patriarchalen Mythos nennt. Die zweite HƤlfte der neunziger Jahre wurde durch die Ausbreitung der Bewegung aus der virtuellen in die physische SphƤre gekennzeichnet, sowie durch das Entstehen von ersten cyberfeministischen Gruppen und das Organisieren von cyberfeministischen Internationalen, die die bedeutendsten Medientheoretikerinnen, KĆ¼nstlerinnen und Aktivistinnen aus der ganzen Welt versammelt haben. Die bloĆe Tatsache der aktiven Nutzung von neuen Technologien zeugt davon, dass Frauen wirksam die geschlechtsspezifische Kennzeichnung der IKT als essentiell MƤnnerspielzeug Ć¼berwƤltigt haben, dass sie die Angst bewƤltigt und die FƤhigkeit gezeigt haben, kreativ und nach eigenen BedĆ¼rfnissen den Cyberraum mit eigenem Inhalt zu fĆ¼llen. WƤhrend dieser Periode entstanden in Kroatien trotz dem Krieg/den Kriegen im ehemaligen Jugoslawien zwei Projekte ā die elektronische Konferenz Zamir/Women und das Bildungsprojekt Elektronische Hexen, die ihrem Wesen nach die ersten Beispiele der cyberfeministischen Praxen in der Region darstellen
For Sociology Inspired by Anima
ForumForu
Oblikovanje obrasca za odgovornost: znanost i teorija održivog razvoja
The article explores the complex relation between theory, research and
real institutional policy with regard to environmental issues. The basic
assumption is that the myriad of empirical scientific research has to be
related to a fruitful theory which could continually challenge official
definitions of sustainability and sustainable development as the main
conceptual shortcomings of the present social order in its attempts to solve
the problems it creates. It implies that a potential āecologicalā society
could be achieved only through radical social change ā a theme that has to
stay as a reminder in the multitude of environmentally sound research and
institutional programs.Älanak istražuje kompleksan odnos izmeÄu teorije, istraživanja i stvarne
institucionalne prakse na planu okoliŔa. Osnovna pretpostavka ukazuje
da brojna empirijska znanstvena istraživanja treba dovesti u vezu s
plodnim teorijskim generalizacijama koje bi omoguÄile kontinuirano
propitivanje službenih definicija održivosti i održivog razvoja kao glavnih
konceptualnih ograniÄenja postojeÄeg druÅ”tvenog poretka u nastojanjima
da rijeÅ”i probleme koje sam proizvodi. To znaÄi da bi se moguÄe āekoloÅ”ko
druÅ”tvoā moglo dosegnuti jedino radikalnom druÅ”tvenom promjenom ā i
ta tema treba stajati kao podsjetnik u mnoŔtvu ekoloŔki senzibiliziranih
istraživanja i institucionalnih programa
Oblikovanje obrasca za odgovornost: znanost i teorija održivog razvoja
The article explores the complex relation between theory, research and
real institutional policy with regard to environmental issues. The basic
assumption is that the myriad of empirical scientific research has to be
related to a fruitful theory which could continually challenge official
definitions of sustainability and sustainable development as the main
conceptual shortcomings of the present social order in its attempts to solve
the problems it creates. It implies that a potential āecologicalā society
could be achieved only through radical social change ā a theme that has to
stay as a reminder in the multitude of environmentally sound research and
institutional programs.Älanak istražuje kompleksan odnos izmeÄu teorije, istraživanja i stvarne
institucionalne prakse na planu okoliŔa. Osnovna pretpostavka ukazuje
da brojna empirijska znanstvena istraživanja treba dovesti u vezu s
plodnim teorijskim generalizacijama koje bi omoguÄile kontinuirano
propitivanje službenih definicija održivosti i održivog razvoja kao glavnih
konceptualnih ograniÄenja postojeÄeg druÅ”tvenog poretka u nastojanjima
da rijeÅ”i probleme koje sam proizvodi. To znaÄi da bi se moguÄe āekoloÅ”ko
druÅ”tvoā moglo dosegnuti jedino radikalnom druÅ”tvenom promjenom ā i
ta tema treba stajati kao podsjetnik u mnoŔtvu ekoloŔki senzibiliziranih
istraživanja i institucionalnih programa
āAtlantidaā kao PekiÄev antropoloÅ”ki epos
The paper deals with the main characteristics and procedures of Borislav PekiÄās model of narration, which is defined as metaphysical and meta-fictional. Decrypting PekiÄās codes asks for continuous research focused not only on the whole achievement that we find in narrative levels, but also looking towards a dynamic and changing structure that exists as a specific semantic absorptive function. Polysemy appears to be an indispensable characteristic of his palimpsest of mythological, historical, psychological and anthropological system of thought, ideas and knowledge, analytically refueling knowable and intuitive sense, the point of separation of circular and linear design sense and the text, and projected through the metaphor of the global history of the human species. A deconstructive treatment of the referential world opens a field for ontological destabilizations of the collective memory, activating the contextual underpinning as well. Search for the essence of humanity and the human mission within the universe resulting in seeing a myth as the essence of human history.The paper deals with the main characteristics and procedures of Borislav PekiÄās model of narration, which is defined as metaphysical and meta-fictional. Decrypting PekiÄās codes asks for continuous research focused not only on the whole achievement that we find in narrative levels, but also looking towards a dynamic and changing structure that exists as a specific semantic absorptive function. Polysemy appears to be an indispensable characteristic of his palimpsest of mythological, historical, psychological and anthropological system of thought, ideas and knowledge, analytically refueling knowable and intuitive sense, the point of separation of circular and linear design sense and the text, and projected through the metaphor of the global history of the human species. A deconstructive treatment of the referential world opens a field for ontological destabilizations of the collective memory, activating the contextual underpinning as well. Search for the essence of humanity and the human mission within the universe resulting in seeing a myth as the essence of human history
Aesthetics and Poetics in AndriÄās Signs by the Roadside
Mnogostrukost i mnogovrsnost glediÅ”ta i miÅ”ljenja ā od psihologije i sociologije umjetnosti, preko povijesti umjetnosti pa do filozofske estetike ā ono je Å”to odreÄuje karakter suvremene estetike, ali i AndriÄeve fragmentarne proze. AndriÄ nije pripadao ni jednom filozofskom sistemu i nije inzistirao na oblikovanju u skladu s bilo kojom estetiÄkom teorijom. Oblikovao je samosvojnu poetsku estetiku koja se može podudarati s filozofsko-estetiÄkim stavovima i shvaÄanjima, ponegdje se s njima razilaziti ili Äak anticipirati premise pojedinih estetiÄkih teorija. Njegov estetski naÄin slikanja i osmiÅ”ljavanja svijeta utemeljen je u sistem binarno-opreÄnih odnosa, kao i u dvostruko postavljenim relacijama sa znakovima koji ga
odreÄuju.Multidimensionality and plurality of views and opinions, from psychology and sociology of art, over art history, to philosophical aesthetics, is what characterizes contemporary aesthetics, as well as AndriÄās fragmented prose. AndriÄ did not identify with any philosophical system, and he did not insist on creating in accordance with any aesthetical theory. AndriÄ developed a unique personal poetical aesthetics that might correspond to some philosopho-aesthetical dispositions and understandings, that might diverge from other, and even anticipate the premises of certain aesthetical theories. His aesthetical way of painting and articulating the world was grounded in the binary-oppositional system of relations, as well as in bi-set relations of signs that defined the system
- ā¦