Representation of the four experimental conditions.

<p>The direction of vision and the position of the tactile stimulator were the same for all conditions.</p

Data File 2 (spreadsheets 2-5): RT costs of alignment for each condition for the composite face task.

<p>RT costs were calculated by subtracting the raw RT for the misaligned condition from the RT for the aligned condition. FH=First half of the experimental block; SH=Second half of the experimental block; I=incongruent, C=congruent.</p> <p>Spreadsheet 2 = Pre-adaptation, First experimental block; Spreadsheet 3 = Pre-adaptation, Second experimental block; Spreadsheet 4 = Post-adaptation, First experimental block; Spreadsheet 5 = Post-adaptation, Second experimental block</p

Datasets 2 and 3: Percentage accuracy and mean RTs (ms) for the group by visual field by validity ANOVA.

<p>Dataset 2: For each participant, percentage accuracy was calculated within each of the levels of visual field and validity. The group data were subjected to a repeated measures ANOVA. The analyses of percentage accuracy are not reported, as they resulted in similar results with regards to the experimental hypotheses as the analysis of mean RTs. L = leftward-shifting prism group; R = rightward-shifting prism group; N=neutral pointing group; LVF = left visual field; RVF = right visual field.</p> <p>Dataset 3: For each participant, RTs (ms) were averaged within each of the levels of visual field and validity. The group data were subjected to a repeated measures ANOVA, as reported in the text. L = leftward-shifting prism group; R = rightward-shifting prism group; N=neutral pointing group; LVF = left visual field; RVF = right visual field.</p

Datasets 6 and 7: Percentage accuracy and mean RTs (ms) for the group by visual field x shift type x horizontal shift direction ANOVA.

<p>Dataset 6: For each participant, percentage accuracy was calculated within each level of visual field and horizontal shift direction. The group data were subjected to a repeated measures ANOVA. The analyses of percentage accuracy are not reported, as they resulted in similar results with regards to the experimental hypotheses as the analysis of mean RTs. L = leftward-shifting prism group; R = rightward-shifting prism group; N=neutral pointing group; LVF = left visual field; RVF = right visual field.</p> <p>Dataset 7: For each participant, RTs (ms) were averaged within each level of visual field and horizontal shift direction. The group data were subjected to a repeated measures ANOVA, as reported in the text. L = leftward-shifting prism group; R = rightward-shifting prism group; N=neutral pointing group; LVF = left visual field; RVF = right visual field; </p

Data File 1 (spreadsheet 1): Mean pre-, post- and late-test pointing errors for all participants.

<p>Values are in degrees of visual angle, with negative numbers indicating a leftward error, and positive values indicating a rightward error.</p

Datasets 4 and 5: Percentage accuracy and mean RTs (ms) for the group by horizontal location ANOVA.

<p>Dataset 4: For each participant, percentage accuracy was calculated within each of the four horizontal location conditions. The group data were subjected to a repeated measures ANOVA. The analyses of percentage accuracy are not reported, as they resulted in similar results with regards to the experimental hypotheses as the analysis of mean RTs. L = leftward-shifting prism group; R = rightward-shifting prism group; N=neutral pointing group; LVF = left visual field; RVF = right visual field; leftloc = left location; rightloc = right location.</p> <p>Dataset 5: For each participant, RTs (ms) were averaged within each of the four horizontal location conditions. The group data were subjected to a repeated measures ANOVA, as reported in the text. L = leftward-shifting prism group; R = rightward-shifting prism group; N=neutral pointing group; LVF = left visual field; RVF = right visual field; leftloc = left location; rightloc = right location.</p