BCL-2 Expression is Prognostic for Improved Survival in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

ObjectiveWe used a large patient population to identify immunohistochemical biomarkers to enable improved prognostication in patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC).MethodsA tissue microarray was constructed using duplicate 0.6 mm cores of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks from 609 patients with NSCLC. Immunohistochemical was used to detect 11 biomarkers including epidermal growth factor receptor, Her2, Her3, p53, p63, bcl-1, bcl-2, Thyroid transcription factor, carcinoembryonic antigen, chromogranin, and synaptophysin. A clinical database was generated prospectively at the time of tissue collection. Survival outcomes were obtained from a Provincial Cancer Registry database. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to look for a relationship between biomarker expression, smoking history, and survival.ResultsSurvival data for 535 cases were available. As of June 2005, 429 patients (80%) had died; of these 286 (54%) died of lung cancer, 117 (22%) died of other known causes, and for 26 (5%) the cause of death was not available. Univariate analysis revealed that bcl-2 (p = 0.007) was the only biomarker prognostic for improved overall survival (OS). bcl-2 (p = 0.021) and p63 (p = 0.025) were both found to be prognostic for improved disease-specific survival (DSS). Multivariate analysis (using age and biomarker expression) revealed that bcl-2 expression is prognostic for improved OS (p = 0.005) and DSS (p = 0.021).ConclusionsOur results suggest that bcl-2 expression is prognostic for improved OS and DSS in NSCLC. Testing for bcl-2 expression in a prospective study will help to determine its clinical relevance in prognostication

American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update on Chemotherapy for Stage IV Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

The purpose of this article is to provide updated recommendations for the treatment of patients with stage IV non–small-cell lung cancer. A literature search identified relevant randomized trials published since 2002. The scope of the guideline was narrowed to chemotherapy and biologic therapy. An Update Committee reviewed the literature and made updated recommendations. One hundred sixty-two publications met the inclusion criteria. Recommendations were based on treatment strategies that improve overall survival. Treatments that improve only progression-free survival prompted scrutiny of toxicity and quality of life. For first-line therapy in patients with performance status of 0 or 1, a platinum-based two-drug combination of cytotoxic drugs is recommended. Nonplatinum cytotoxic doublets are acceptable for patients with contraindications to platinum therapy. For patients with performance status of 2, a single cytotoxic drug is sufficient. Stop first-line cytotoxic chemotherapy at disease progression or after four cycles in patients who are not responding to treatment. Stop two-drug cytotoxic chemotherapy at six cycles even in patients who are responding to therapy. The first-line use of gefitinib may be recommended for patients with known epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation; for negative or unknown EGFR mutation status, cytotoxic chemotherapy is preferred. Bevacizumab is recommended with carboplatin-paclitaxel, except for patients with certain clinical characteristics. Cetuximab is recommended with cisplatin-vinorelbine for patients with EGFR-positive tumors by immunohistochemistry. Docetaxel, erlotinib, gefitinib, or pemetrexed is recommended as second-line therapy. Erlotinib is recommended as third-line therapy for patients who have not received prior erlotinib or gefitinib. Data are insufficient to recommend the routine third-line use of cytotoxic drugs. Data are insufficient to recommend routine use of molecular markers to select chemotherapy

Correlations of EGFR mutations and increases in EGFR and HER2 copy number to gefitinib response in a retrospective analysis of lung cancer patients

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Gefitinib, a small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (<it>EGFR</it>), has shown limited efficacy in the treatment of lung cancer. Recognized clinical predictors of response to this drug, specifically female, non-smoker, Asian descent, and adenocarcinoma, together suggest a genetic basis for drug response. Recent studies have addressed the relationship between response and either sequence mutations or increased copy number of specific receptor tyrosine kinases. We set out to examine the relationship between response and the molecular status of two such kinases, <it>EGFR </it>and <it>HER2</it>, in 39 patients treated with gefitinib at the BC Cancer Agency.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Archival patient material was reviewed by a pathologist and malignant cells were selectively isolated by laser microdissection or manual recovery of cells from microscope slides. Genomic DNA was extracted from 37 such patient samples and exons 18–24, coding for the tyrosine kinase domain of <it>EGFR</it>, were amplified by PCR and sequenced. <it>EGFR </it>and <it>HER2 </it>copy number status were also assessed using FISH in 26 samples. Correlations between molecular features and drug response were assessed using the two-sided Fisher's exact test.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Mutations previously correlated with response were detected in five tumours, four with exon 19 deletions and one with an exon 21 missense L858R point mutation. Increased gene copy number was observed in thirteen tumours, seven with <it>EGFR </it>amplification, three with <it>HER2 </it>amplification, and three with amplification of both genes. In our study cohort, a correlation was not observed between response and <it>EGFR </it>mutations (exon 19 deletion p = 0.0889, we observed a single exon 21 mutation in a non-responder) or increases in <it>EGFR </it>or <it>HER2 </it>copy number (p = 0.552 and 0.437, respectively).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Neither mutation of <it>EGFR </it>nor increased copy number of <it>EGFR </it>or <it>HER2 </it>was diagnostic of response to gefitinib in this cohort. However, validation of these features in a larger sample set is appropriate. Identification of additional predictive biomarkers beyond <it>EGFR </it>status may be necessary to accurately predict treatment outcome.</p

Disparate Time-to-Treatment and Varied Incidence of Actionable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Molecular Alterations in British Columbia: A Historical Cohort Study

Background: non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) outcomes remain suboptimal for early-stage disease despite emerging advances in systemic therapy for the peri-operative period. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) identifies driver mutations for which targeted therapies have been developed that improve survival. The BC lung cancer screening program, which was initiated in May 2022, is expected to identify people with early and late stages of NSCLC. It is crucial to first understand the molecular epidemiology and patterns of time to initiate treatment across its five health authorities (HA) to optimize the delivery of care for NSCLC in BC. In this way, we may harness the benefits of targeted therapy for more people with NSCLC as novel advances in therapy continue to emerge. Objective: to compare (a) the frequency of actionable NSCLC molecular alterations among HAs and (b) the time to treatment initiation. Methods: a retrospective observational study was conducted with prospectively collected data from the BC CGL Database. Adults with late stage NSCLC who underwent targeted NGS were included for the time period from May 2020 to June 2021. Demographics, actionable molecular alterations, PDL-1 expression, and time to treatment across HAs were examined. Using appropriate statistical tests for comparison among HAs, p>0.05 was deemed significant. Results: 582 patients underwent NGS/IHC and analysis during the study period. The mean age was 71 (10.1), and 326 (56%) patients were female. A significantly higher proportion of all EGFRm+ were identified within Vancouver Coastal Health (VCHA) and Fraser Health Authority (FHA) compared to the other health authorities (p p p = 0.005). Patients residing within the Northern, Interior, and Island HAs were less likely to receive treatment at the same rate as those in VCHA and FHA HAs. Conclusion: actionable NSCLC driver mutations are present in all regional HAs, with disparity noted in time to initiate treatment between HAs. This provides evidence for the importance of molecular testing for patients in all BC HAs to guide personalized and timely NSCLC treatment