Cost-effectiveness results over 20 years^a.

<p>Cost-effectiveness results over 20 years<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0131255#t001fn002" target="_blank">^a</a>.</p

Markov model.

<p>nmr = natural mortality rate. tpA2A = transition probability of staying in state A. tpA2B = transition probability of moving from state A to state B. tpB2A = transition probability of moving from state B to state A. tpB2B = transition probability of staying in state B.</p

Willingness-to-pay values for crimes (Cohen & Piquero, 2009).

<p>Willingness-to-pay values for crimes (Cohen & Piquero, 2009).</p

Incremental cost-effectiveness plane for Course House compared with FFT (10,000 simulations).

<p>FFT = Functional Family Therapy CAFY = Criminal Activity Free Year.</p

Calculation of expected value of perfect information (EVPI) for individual adolescent.

<p>Calculation of expected value of perfect information (EVPI) for individual adolescent.</p

population Expected Value of Perfect Information (pEVPI) and population Expected Value of Partial Perfect Information (pEVPPI) curve.

<p>FFT = Functional Family Therapy. CAFY = Criminal Activity Free Year. pEVPI = population Expected Value of Perfect Information. pEVPPI = population Expected Value of Partial Perfect Information.</p

Forest plots showing the effectiveness of mindfulness interventions compared with wait list control or treatment as usual on the outcomes a) Depression, b) Anxiety, c) Stress, d) Quality of life and e) Physical functioning in different populations.

<p>The size of the marker per review indicates the size of the study population. The breadth of the line indicates the 95%CI. All values lower than 0 indicate a significant difference in favour of MBSR/MBCT. Values between 0 and -0.2 indicate negligible effect; between -0.2 and -0.5 small effect; between -0.5 and -0.8 medium effect and lower than -0.8 a large effect.</p

Quality assessment of included reviews.

<p>+ = yes;? = unclear;— = no; N/A = not applicable</p><p>Quality assessment of included reviews.</p

Results.

<p>Effect sizes reported as in reviews in different outcome measurements for the intergroup comparisons. Values are significant except when in parentheses. Smd = standard mean difference; OR = Odds Ratio; Wmd = weighted mean difference; HR = Hazard Ratio; RR = Risk Ratio. Interpretation: Cohen’s d, Hedges’g and smd: effect size 0–0.19 = no effect; 0.2–0.49 = small effect; 0.5–0.79 = medium effect; 0.8 and above = large effect. () = not significant. WL = compared to Wait list control; AT = compared to active treatment control</p><p>Results.</p

Percentage of respondents reporting no problems on any of the 5 dimensions (health state ‘11111’) (N = 465).

<p>Percentage of respondents reporting no problems on any of the 5 dimensions (health state ‘11111’) (N = 465).</p