2 research outputs found
Assessing the Climate Trade-Offs of Gasoline Direct Injection Engines
Compared to port
fuel injection (PFI) engine exhaust, gasoline
direct injection (GDI) engine exhaust has higher emissions of black
carbon (BC), a climate-warming pollutant. However, the relative increase
in BC emissions and climate trade-offs of replacing PFI vehicles with
more fuel efficient GDI vehicles remain uncertain. In this study,
BC emissions from GDI and PFI vehicles were compiled and BC emissions
scenarios were developed to evaluate the climate impact of GDI vehicles
using global warming potential (GWP) and global temperature potential
(GTP) metrics. From a 20 year time horizon GWP analysis, average fuel
economy improvements ranging from 0.14 to 14% with GDI vehicles are
required to offset BC-induced warming. For all but the lowest BC scenario,
installing a gasoline particulate filter with an 80% BC removal efficiency
and <1% fuel penalty is climate beneficial. From the GTP-based
analysis, it was also determined that GDI vehicles are climate beneficial
within <1–20 years; longer time horizons were associated
with higher BC scenarios. The GDI BC emissions spanned 2 orders of
magnitude and varied by ambient temperature, engine operation, and
fuel composition. More work is needed to understand BC formation mechanisms
in GDI engines to ensure that the climate impacts of this engine technology
are minimal
Field Measurements of Gasoline Direct Injection Emission Factors: Spatial and Seasonal Variability
Four
field campaigns were conducted between February 2014 and January
2015 to measure emissions from light-duty gasoline direct injection
(GDI) vehicles (2013 Ford Focus) in an urban near-road environment
in Toronto, Canada. Measurements of CO<sub>2</sub>, CO, NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>, black carbon (BC), benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene-xylenes
(BTEX), and size-resolved particle number (PN) were recorded 15 m
from the roadway and converted to fuel-based emission factors (EFs).
Other than for NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> and CO, the GDI engine
had elevated emissions compared to the Toronto fleet, with BC EFs
in the 73rd percentile, BTEX EFs in the 80–90th percentile,
and PN EFs in the 75th percentile during wintertime measurements.
Additionally, for three campaigns, a second platform for measuring
PN and CO<sub>2</sub> was placed 1.5–3 m from the roadway to
quantify changes in PN with distance from point of emission. GDI vehicle
PN EFs were found to increase by up to 240% with increasing distance
from the roadway, predominantly due to an increasing fraction of sub-40
nm particles. PN and BC EFs from the same engine technology were also
measured in the laboratory. BC EFs agreed within 20% between the laboratory
and real-world measurements; however, laboratory PN EFs were an order
of magnitude lower due to exhaust conditioning