37 research outputs found

    Evaluation of Surgically Retrieved Temporomandibular Joint Alloplastic Implants: Pilot Study

    Get PDF
    PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to perform a retrieval analysis of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) alloplastic interpositional implants and test possible correlation between implant failure features and patient clinical outcomes. In addition, we investigated the implants' surface and examined the foreign body reaction associated with different types of alloplastic materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twelve implants (Proplast/Teflon [Vitek, Houston, TX] and Silastic [Dow Corning, Midland, MI]) were surgically removed from the patients' TMJs. Implant surface failure features (fracture length, perforation of the implants) were observed using stereomicroscopy and recorded for description of the failure mechanisms and to statistically compare with clinical outcomes. Patients' clinical data (pain symptoms and mandibular function) were collected and examined. Clinical outcomes were obtained relative to symptom severity (Symptom Severity Index [SSI]) and jaw function (modified Mandibular Function Impairment Questionnaire [mMFIQ]). Peri-implant soft tissues and implants were analyzed with light microscopy and stereo zoom microscopy. Electron microprobe analysis of implant fragments and peri-implant tissues was performed. RESULTS: The statistical results showed that only the presence of implant perforation was statistically associated with the SSI, specifically with the pain tolerability dimension. No statistical association was seen between any of the other implant failure predictors and the SSI and between the predictors and the mMFIQ. Stereo zoom microscopy suggested that Proplast/Teflon implants (n = 7) were susceptible to perforation, layer tearing, fracture and fiber extrusion. The Silastic implants (n = 3) revealed a possible center perforation with fracture lines towards the periphery and fiber extrusion. Teflon implant wear debris particles appear to trigger a multinucleated giant cell foreign body reaction. CONCLUSION: Facial pain was a significant correlate to perforation and breakdown of the alloplastic TMJ interpositional implants, and most likely was the reason for implant removal

    Myofascial Pain Syndrome

    Full text link

    Clinical Care for Myofascial Pain

    Full text link

    Transformative Care for Orofacial Disorders

    Full text link

    MASTICATORY MYOFASCIAL PAIN: AN EXPLANATORY MODEL INTEGRATING CLINICAL, EPIDEMIOLOGICAL AND BASIC SCIENCE RESEARCH

    Full text link
    Masticatory myofascial pain (MMP) is a regional muscle pain disorder characterized by localized muscle tendemess in taut bands of skeletal muscles and pain and is one of the most common causes of persistent regional pain. The affected muscles may also display an increased fatigability, stiffness, subjective weakness, pain in movement, and slight restricted ROM that is unrelated to joint restriction. Although the exact etiology of MMP is unclear, recent research has improved our understanding of factors that contribute to the development and progression of MMP. Understanding these factors can help to validate an explanatory model for etiology and treatment of MMP. This model includes peripheral mechanisms from local biomechanical strain leading to the onset of early cases of MMP while central mechanisms associated with psychosocial factors lead to increased chronicity of MMP. As MP persists, chronic pain characteristics often precede or follow it's development. Management of the syndrome naturally follows from this model with therapy to rehabilitate the trigger points (TrPs) while focusing effort on reducing all contributing factors

    Call for Papers

    No full text

    Manual Medicine – State of the Art 1996

    No full text
    corecore